| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We were limiting the sum of the xattr name and value lengths to PATH_MAX,
which is not correct, specially on filesystems created with btrfs-progs
v3.12 or higher, where the default leaf size is max(16384, PAGE_SIZE), or
systems with page sizes larger than 4096 bytes.
Xattrs have their own specific maximum name and value lengths, which depend
on the leaf size, therefore use these limits to be able to send xattrs with
sizes larger than PATH_MAX.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.
Steps to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
mkdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
rmdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled:
Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was
previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it
doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs
to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number
than ours).
So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or:
1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send
root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered);
2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and
exists only in the send root).
Reproducer for case 1)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/h
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Another simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g
$ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
More complex reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building
path strings.
While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect
when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several
specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple
detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop
detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as
the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed).
Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into
account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending
move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher
then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they
are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated
name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when
progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location.
Reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h
$ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE
$ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second receive command failed with the following error:
ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's
generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get
the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which
is in some cases).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
The patch "Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion"
(18f687d538449373c37c) does not actually prevent to delete the snapshot
and just takes care during background cleaning, but this seems rather
user unfriendly, this patch implements the idea presented in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30813.html
- add an internal root_item flag to denote a dead root
- check if the send_in_progress is set and refuse to delete, otherwise
set the flag and proceed
- check the flag in send similar to the btrfs_root_readonly checks, for
all involved roots
The root lookup in send via btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name will check if the
root is really dead or not. If it is, ENOENT, aborted send. If it's
alive, it's protected by send_in_progress, send can continue.
CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
If a path has more than 230 characters, we allocate a new buffer to
use for the path, but we were forgotting to copy the contents of the
previous buffer into the new one, which has random content from the
kmalloc call.
Test:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
TEST_PATH="/mnt/fdmanana/.config/google-chrome-mysetup/Default/Pepper_Data/Shockwave_Flash/WritableRoot/#SharedObjects/JSHJ4ZKN/s.wsj.net/[[IMPORT]]/players.edgesuite.net/flash/plugins/osmf/advanced-streaming-plugin/v2.7/osmf1.6/Ak#"
mkdir -p $TEST_PATH
echo "hello world" > $TEST_PATH/amaiAdvancedStreamingPlugin.txt
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
A test for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
When running send, if an inode only has extended reference items
associated to it and no regular references, send.c:get_first_ref()
was incorrectly assuming the reference it found was of type
BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY due to use of the wrong key variable.
This caused weird behaviour when using the found item has a regular
reference, such as weird path string, and occasionally (when lucky)
a crash:
[ 190.600652] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 190.600994] Modules linked in: btrfs xor raid6_pq binfmt_misc nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc psmouse serio_raw evbug pcspkr i2c_piix4 e1000 floppy
[ 190.602565] CPU: 2 PID: 14520 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 3.13.0-fdm-btrfs-next-26+ #1
[ 190.602728] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 190.602868] task: ffff8800d447c920 ti: ffff8801fa79e000 task.ti: ffff8801fa79e000
[ 190.603030] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813266b4>] [<ffffffff813266b4>] memcpy+0x54/0x110
[ 190.603262] RSP: 0018:ffff8801fa79f880 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 190.603395] RAX: ffff8800d4326e3f RBX: 000000000000036a RCX: ffff880000000000
[ 190.603553] RDX: 000000000000032a RSI: ffe708844042936a RDI: ffff8800d43271a9
[ 190.603710] RBP: ffff8801fa79f8c8 R08: 00000000003a4ef0 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 190.603867] R10: 793a4ef09f000000 R11: 9f0000000053726f R12: ffff8800d43271a9
[ 190.604020] R13: 0000160000000000 R14: ffff8802110134f0 R15: 000000000000036a
[ 190.604020] FS: 00007fb423d09b80(0000) GS:ffff880216200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 190.604020] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 190.604020] CR2: 00007fb4229d4b78 CR3: 00000001f5d76000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 190.604020] Stack:
[ 190.604020] ffffffffa01f4d49 ffff8801fa79f8f0 00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f8c8
[ 190.604020] 00000000000009f9 ffff880211013260 000000000000f971 ffff88021147dba8
[ 190.604020] 00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f918 ffffffffa02367f5 ffff8801fa79f928
[ 190.604020] Call Trace:
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa01f4d49>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xb9/0x120 [btrfs]
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa02367f5>] fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer+0x45/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238806>] get_first_ref+0x1f6/0x210 [btrfs]
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238994>] __get_cur_name_and_parent+0x174/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffff8118df3d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x11d/0x1e0
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0236674>] ? fs_path_alloc+0x24/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238c91>] get_cur_path+0xd1/0x240 [btrfs]
(...)
Steps to reproduce (either crash or some weirdness like an odd path string):
mkfs.btrfs -f -O extref /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
mkdir /mnt/testdir
touch /mnt/testdir/foobar
for i in `seq 1 2550`; do
ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i`
done
ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/final_foobar_name
rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar
for i in `seq 1 2550`; do
rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i`
done
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap
btrfs send /mnt/mysnap -f /tmp/mysnap.send
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
|
|
fs_path_ensure_buf is used to make sure our path buffers for
send are big enough for the path names as we construct them.
The buffer size is limited to 32K by the length field in
the struct.
But bugs in the path construction can end up trying to build
a huge buffer, and we'll do invalid memmmoves when the
buffer length field wraps.
This patch is step one, preventing the overflows.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
There's no point building the path string in each iteration of the
send_hole loop, as it produces always the same string.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
During an incremental send, when we finish processing an inode (corresponding to
a regular file) we would assume the gap between the end of the last processed file
extent and the file's size corresponded to a file hole, and therefore incorrectly
send a bunch of zero bytes to overwrite that region in the file.
This affects only kernel 3.14.
Reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
mount /dev/sdc /mnt
xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 268435456" /mnt/foo
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap0
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 9216 16190218 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 1121 198720104 1121" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x05 -b 9216 107887439 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 9216 225520207 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x07 -b 67584 102138300 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x08 -b 7000 94897484 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x09 -b 113664 245083212 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x10 -b 123 17937788 123" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x11 -b 39936 229573311 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x12 -b 67584 174792222 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x13 -b 9216 249253213 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x16 -b 67584 150046083 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x17 -b 39936 118246040 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x18 -b 67584 215965442 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x19 -b 33792 97096725 33792" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x20 -b 125952 166300596 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x21 -b 123 1078957 123" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x25 -b 9216 212044492 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x26 -b 7000 265037146 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x27 -b 42757 215922685 42757" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x28 -b 7000 69865411 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x29 -b 67584 67948958 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x30 -b 39936 266967019 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x31 -b 1121 19582453 1121" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x32 -b 17408 257710255 17408" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x33 -b 39936 3895518 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x34 -b 125952 12045847 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x35 -b 17408 19156379 17408" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x36 -b 39936 50160066 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x37 -b 113664 9549793 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x38 -b 105472 94391506 105472" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x39 -b 23552 143632863 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x40 -b 39936 241283845 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x41 -b 113664 199937606 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x42 -b 67584 67380093 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x43 -b 67584 26793129 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x44 -b 39936 14421913 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x45 -b 123 253097405 123" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x46 -b 1121 128233424 1121" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x47 -b 105472 91577959 105472" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x48 -b 1121 7245381 1121" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x49 -b 113664 182414694 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x50 -b 9216 32750608 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x51 -b 67584 266546049 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x52 -b 67584 87969398 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x53 -b 9216 260848797 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x54 -b 39936 119461243 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x55 -b 7000 200178693 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x56 -b 9216 243316029 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x57 -b 7000 209658229 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 101376 179745192 101376" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x59 -b 9216 64012300 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x60 -b 125952 181705139 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -b 23552 235737348 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x62 -b 113664 106021355 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b 67584 135753552 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 -b 23552 95730888 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x65 -b 11 17311415 11" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x66 -b 33792 120695553 33792" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x67 -b 9216 17164631 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x68 -b 9216 136065853 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x69 -b 67584 37752198 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x70 -b 101376 189717473 101376" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x71 -b 7000 227463698 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x72 -b 9216 12655137 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 -b 7000 7488866 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x74 -b 113664 87813649 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x75 -b 33792 25802183 33792" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x76 -b 39936 93524024 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x77 -b 33792 113336388 33792" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x78 -b 105472 184955320 105472" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x79 -b 101376 225691598 101376" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x80 -b 23552 77023155 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x81 -b 11 201888192 11" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x82 -b 11 115332492 11" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x83 -b 67584 230278015 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x84 -b 11 120589073 11" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x85 -b 125952 202207819 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x86 -b 113664 86672080 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x87 -b 17408 208459603 17408" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x88 -b 7000 73372211 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x89 -b 7000 42252122 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x90 -b 23552 46784881 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x91 -b 101376 63172351 101376" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x92 -b 23552 59341931 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x93 -b 39936 239599283 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x94 -b 67584 175643105 67584" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x97 -b 23552 105534880 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x98 -b 113664 8236844 113664" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x99 -b 125952 144489686 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa0 -b 7000 73273112 7000" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 125952 194580243 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa2 -b 123 56296779 123" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa3 -b 11 233066845 11" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa4 -b 39936 197727090 39936" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa5 -b 101376 53579812 101376" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa6 -b 9216 85669738 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa7 -b 125952 21266322 125952" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa8 -b 23552 125726568 23552" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa9 -b 9216 18423680 9216" /mnt/foo
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb0 -b 1121 165901483 1121" /mnt/foo
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10 16190218 10" /mnt/foo
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
md5sum /mnt/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e
md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e too
btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
mount /dev/sdc /mnt
btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap
md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 2bb414c5155767cedccd7063e51beabd !!
A testcase for xfstests follows soon too.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just
accessing root->commit_root. We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a
read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access
root->commit_root under the commit root sem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Lets try this again. We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to
write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe.
This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit
which is being blocked by the send. So fix this by making sure looking at the
commit roots is always going to be consistent. We do this by keeping track of
which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then
taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once. Then make sure we
take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root
to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots.
Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root
and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the
backref walking code to screw up sometimes. With this patch we no longer
deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases. Thanks,
Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
So I have an awful exercise script that will run snapshot, balance and
send/receive in parallel. This sometimes would crash spectacularly and when it
came back up the fs would be completely hosed. Turns out this is because of a
bad interaction of balance and send/receive. Send will hold onto its entire
path for the whole send, but its blocks could get relocated out from underneath
it, and because it doesn't old tree locks theres nothing to keep this from
happening. So it will go to read in a slot with an old transid, and we could
have re-allocated this block for something else and it could have a completely
different transid. But because we think it is invalid we clear uptodate and
re-read in the block. If we do this before we actually write out the new block
we could write back stale data to the fs, and boom we're screwed.
Now we definitely need to fix this disconnect between send and balance, but we
really really need to not allow ourselves to accidently read in stale data over
new data. So make sure we check if the extent buffer is not under io before
clearing uptodate, this will kick back EIO to the caller instead of reading in
stale data and keep us from corrupting the fs. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
fs/btrfs/send.c:2926: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this
function
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory
inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed.
We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher
inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our
move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might
have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case
we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current
directory's rename/move operation.
Simple steps to reproduce this issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2
$ mkdir /mnt/a/Z
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33
$ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed.
A more complex scenario:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2
$ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/o
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories
in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than
its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation
can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move
operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its
rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's
rename/move.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/A
$ mkdir /mnt/B
$ mkdir /mnt/C
$ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A
$ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C
$ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2
$ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2
$ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory C after its references are processed.
The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both
A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest
inode number, that is:
inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D)
The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number
of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2.
A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced
ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
No need to search in the send tree for the generation number of the inode,
we already have it in the recorded_ref structure passed to us.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Btrfs send reads data from disk and then writes to a stream via pipe or
a file via flush.
Currently we're going to read each page a time, so every page results
in a disk read, which is not friendly to disks, esp. HDD. Given that,
the performance can be gained by adding readahead for those pages.
Here is a quick test:
$ btrfs subvolume create send
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" send/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snap -r send ro
$ time "btrfs send ro -f /dev/null"
w/o w
real 1m37.527s 0m9.097s
user 0m0.122s 0m0.086s
sys 0m53.191s 0m12.857s
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
This has no functional change, only picks out the same part of two functions,
and makes it shared.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
When we're finishing processing of an inode, if we're dealing with a
directory inode that has a pending move/rename operation, we don't
need to send a utimes update instruction to the send stream, as we'll
do it later after doing the move/rename operation. Therefore we save
some time here building paths and doing btree lookups.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev
in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx,
and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
In "btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case" the code to
save the old_buf_len was incorrectly moved to a wrong place and broke
the original logic.
Reported-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename
operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were
pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would
be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a
path which matched the one in the parent root.
This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path
for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f
$ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
$ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue
a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently
processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced
the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such
inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation,
because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and
was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit
addressed:
9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22
(Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send)
This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the
target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail.
Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to
be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation.
Simple steps to reproduce this issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
$ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
When doing an incremental send, if we delete a directory that has N > 1
hardlinks for the same file and that file has the highest inode number
inside the directory contents, an incremental send would send N times an
rmdir operation against the directory. This made the btrfs receive command
fail on the second rmdir instruction, as the target directory didn't exist
anymore.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ echo 'ola mundo' > /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
$ ln /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
$ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
$ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled:
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory
which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we
perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the
parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an
incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory
which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old
name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umout /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
"ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory"
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 41ce9970a8a6a362ae8df145f7a03d789e9ef9d2.
Previously i was thinking we can use readonly root's commit root
safely while it is not true, readonly root may be cowed with the
following cases.
1.snapshot send root will cow source root.
2.balance,device operations will also cow readonly send root
to relocate.
So i have two ideas to make us safe to use commit root.
-->approach 1:
make it protected by transaction and end transaction properly and we research
next item from root node(see btrfs_search_slot_for_read()).
-->approach 2:
add another counter to local root structure to sync snapshot with send.
and add a global counter to sync send with exclusive device operations.
So with approach 2, send can use commit root safely, because we make sure
send root can not be cowed during send. Unfortunately, it make codes *ugly*
and more complex to maintain.
To make snapshot and send exclusively, device operations and send operation
exclusively with each other is a little confusing for common users.
So why not drop into previous way.
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
The fs_path structure uses an inline buffer and falls back to a chain of
allocations, but vmalloc is not necessary because PATH_MAX fits into
PAGE_SIZE.
The size of fs_path has been reduced to 256 bytes from PAGE_SIZE,
usually 4k. Experimental measurements show that most paths on a single
filesystem do not exceed 200 bytes, and these get stored into the inline
buffer directly, which is now 230 bytes. Longer paths are kmalloced when
needed.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
We have this pattern where we do search for a contiguous group of
items in a tree and everytime we find an item, we process it, then
we release our path, increment the offset of the search key, do
another full tree search and repeat these steps until a tree search
can't find more items we're interested in.
Instead of doing these full tree searches after processing each item,
just process the next item/slot in our leaf and don't release the path.
Since all these trees are read only and we always use the commit root
for a search and skip node/leaf locks, we're not affecting concurrency
on the trees.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
This was a leftover from the commit:
74dd17fbe3d65829e75d84f00a9525b2ace93998
(Btrfs: fix btrfs send for inline items and compression)
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
If cleaning the name cache fails, we could try to proceed at the cost of
some memory leak. This is not expected to happen often.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
There are only 2 static callers, the BUG would normally be never
reached, but let's be nice.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
We know that buf_len is at most PATH_MAX, 4k, and can merge it with the
reversed member. This saves 3 bytes in favor of inline_buf.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
We don't need to keep track of that, it's available via is_vmalloc_addr.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
The member is used only to return value back from
fs_path_prepare_for_add, we can do it locally and save 8 bytes for the
inline_buf path.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
The buffer passed to snprintf can hold the fully expanded format string,
64 = 3x largest ULL + 3x char + trailing null. I don't think that removing the
check entirely is a good idea, hence the ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
The commit titled "Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send"
didn't cover a particular case where the parent-child relationship inversion
of directories doesn't imply a rename of the new parent directory. This was
due to a simple logic mistake, a logical and instead of a logical or.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3/bar2/k11
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send
A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
This fixes a case that the commit titled:
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
didn't cover. If the parent-child relationship between 2 directories
is inverted, both get renamed, and the former parent has a file that
got renamed too (but remains a child of that directory), the incremental
send operation would use the file's old path after sending an unlink
operation for that old path, causing receive to fail on future operations
like changing owner, permissions or utimes of the corresponding inode.
This is not a regression from the commit mentioned before, as without
that commit we would fall into the issues that commit fixed, so it's
just one case that wasn't covered before.
Simple steps to reproduce this issue are:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
$ touch /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/file
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file2
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send
A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
Function wait_for_parent_move() returns negative value if an error
happened, 0 if we don't need to wait for the parent's move, and
1 if the wait is needed.
Before this change an error return value was being treated like the
return value 1, which was not correct.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
|
|
For non compressed extents, iterate_extent_inodes() gives us offsets
that take into account the data offset from the file extent items, while
for compressed extents it doesn't. Therefore we have to adjust them before
placing them in a send clone instruction. Not doing this adjustment leads to
the receiving end requesting for a wrong a file range to the clone ioctl,
which results in different file content from the one in the original send
root.
Issue reproducible with the following excerpt from the test I made for
xfstests:
_scratch_mkfs
_scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x3e -b 80000 200000 80000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xdc -b 10000 250000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10000 300000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
# will be used for incremental send to be able to issue clone operations
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
$FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
$FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/2.fssum -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 \
-x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
$FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap \
-x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap1 -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap2
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap -f $tmp/clones.snap
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
-c $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 -f $tmp/2.snap
_scratch_unmount
_scratch_mkfs
_scratch_mount
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
$FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/clones.snap
$FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap 2>> $seqres.full
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
$FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
reproduce. Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set,
which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in
his original patch. Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move
asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
After the commit titled "Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in",
LIBCRC32C requirement was removed from btrfs' Kconfig. This made it not
possible to build a kernel with btrfs enabled (either as module or built-in)
if libcrc32c is not enabled as well. So just replace all uses of libcrc32c
with the equivalent function in btrfs hash.h - btrfs_crc32c.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
the new size. The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
size as it goes.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
There was a case where file hole detection was incorrect and it would
cause an incremental send to override a section of a file with zeroes.
This happened in the case where between the last leaf we processed which
contained a file extent item for our current inode and the leaf we're
currently are at (and has a file extent item for our current inode) there
are only leafs containing exclusively file extent items for our current
inode, and none of them was updated since the previous send operation.
The file hole detection code would incorrectly consider the file range
covered by these leafs as a hole.
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
Instead of looking for a file extent item, process it, release the path
and do a btree search for the next file extent item, just process all
file extent items in a leaf without intermediate btree searches. This way
we save cpu and we're not blocking other tasks or affecting concurrency on
the btree, because send's paths use the commit root and skip btree node/leaf
locking.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes
that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the
caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the
one we're currently processing) were processed.
This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change
between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory
inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became
parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop,
which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc
warning being displayed in dmesg:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0()
Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid
CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3
Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
[ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007
[ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0
[ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0
[ 5381.660457] Call Trace:
[ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
[ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0
[ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
[ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440
[ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
[ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
[ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0
[ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
[ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
[ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100
[ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230
[ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
[ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0
[ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
[ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs]
Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt
to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was
renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc
$ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send
The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is:
. (ino 256)
|-- a (ino 257)
|-- b (ino 258)
|-- c (ino 259)
| |-- d (ino 260)
|
|-- c2 (ino 261)
And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is:
. (ino 256)
|-- a (ino 257)
|-- b (ino 258)
|-- c2 (ino 261)
|-- d2 (ino 260)
|-- cc (ino 259)
Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the
move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child
of 260.
A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
