summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-01drm/i915: Check for awaits on still currently executing requestsChris Wilson1-1/+48
With the advent of preempt-to-busy, a request may still be on the GPU as we unwind. And in the case of a unpreemptible [due to HW] request, that request will remain indefinitely on the GPU even though we have returned it back to our submission queue, and cleared the active bit. We only run the execution callbacks on transferring the request from our submission queue to the execution queue, but if this is a bonded request that the HW is waiting for, we will not submit it (as we wait for a fresh execution) even though it is still being executed. As we know that there are always preemption points between requests, we know that only the currently executing request may be still active even though we have cleared the flag. However, we do not precisely know which request is in ELSP[0] due to a delay in processing events, and furthermore we only store the last request in a context in our state tracker. Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-dual Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529143926.3245-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit b55230e5e800868961fc271b26d9ce53ae1f691e) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-01drm/i915/gt: Do not schedule normal requests immediately along virtualChris Wilson1-4/+21
When we push a virtual request onto the HW, we update the rq->engine to point to the physical engine. A request that is then submitted by the user that waits upon the virtual engine, but along the physical engine in use, will then see that it is due to be submitted to the same engine and take a shortcut (and be queued without waiting for the completion fence). However, the virtual request may be preempted (either by higher priority users, or by timeslicing) and removed from the physical engine to be migrated over to one of its siblings. The dependent normal request however is oblivious to the removal of the virtual request and remains queued to execute on HW, believing that once it reaches the head of its queue all of its predecessors will have completed executing! v2: Beware restriction of signal->execution_mask prior to submission. Fixes: 6d06779e8672 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 511b6d9aed417739b6aa49d0b6b4354ad21020f1) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-01drm/i915: Reorder await_execution before await_requestChris Wilson1-132/+132
Reorder the code so that we can reuse the await_execution from a special case in await_request in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit ffb0c600c240103f6f34e07892a7e0a75502b243) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-05-25drm/i915: Avoid using rq->engine after free during i915_fence_releaseChris Wilson1-2/+33
In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that rq->engine can only be a real engine (that stay intact until the device is shutdown after all fences have been flushed). However, due to a quirk of preempt-to-busy, we may retire a request that still belongs to a virtual engine and so eventually free it with rq->engine being invalid. To avoid dereferencing that invalid engine, we look at the execution_mask which if it indicates it may be executed on more than one engine, we know it originated on a virtual engine and may still be on one. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1906 Fixes: 43acd6516ca9 ("drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request pool") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200521140617.30015-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 32a4605b38c30689a6a18f3f4c7d3133ac9d3277) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-05-14drm/i915: Drop no-semaphore boostingChris Wilson1-36/+4
Now that we have fast timeslicing on semaphores, we no longer need to prioritise none-semaphore work as we will yield any work blocked on a semaphore to the next in the queue. Previously with no timeslicing, blocking on the semaphore caused extremely bad scheduling with multiple clients utilising multiple rings. Now, there is no impact and we can remove the complication. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513173504.28322-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-13drm/i915: Mark the addition of the initial-breadcrumb in the requestChris Wilson1-1/+6
The initial-breadcrumb is used to mark the end of the awaiting and the beginning of the user payload. We verify that we do not start the user payload before all signaler are completed, checking our semaphore setup by looking for the initial breadcrumb being written too early. We also want to ensure that we do not add semaphore waits after we have already closed the semaphore section, an issue for later deferred waits. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513165937.9508-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-09drm/i915: Replace the hardcoded I915_FENCE_TIMEOUTChris Wilson1-1/+2
Expose the hardcoded timeout for unsignaled foreign fences as a Kconfig option, primarily to allow brave systems to disable the timeout and solely rely on correct signaling. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200509105021.12542-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-08drm/i915: Prevent using semaphores to chain up to external fencesChris Wilson1-0/+26
The downside of using semaphores is that we lose metadata passing along the signaling chain. This is particularly nasty when we need to pass along a fatal error such as EFAULT or EDEADLK. For fatal errors we want to scrub the request before it is executed, which means that we cannot preload the request onto HW and have it wait upon a semaphore. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-08drm/i915: Peel dma-fence-chains for awaitLionel Landwerlin1-1/+28
To allow faster engine to engine synchronization, peel the layer of dma-fence-chain to expose potential i915 fences so that the i915_request code can emit HW semaphore wait/signal operations in the ring which is faster than waking up the host to submit unblocked workloads after interrupt notification. This is similar to the peeling we do for e.g. dma_fence_array. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508185448.29709-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-08drm/i915: Pull waiting on an external dma-fence into its routineChris Wilson1-6/+10
As a means for a small code consolidation, but primarily to start thinking more carefully about internal-vs-external linkage, pull the pair of i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence() calls into a common routine. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-08drm/i915: Ignore submit-fences on the same timelineChris Wilson1-0/+3
While we ordinarily do not skip submit-fences due to the accompanying hook that we want to callback on execution, a submit-fence on the same timeline is meaningless. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-07drm/i915: Remove wait priority boostingChris Wilson1-3/+0
Upon waiting a request (when asked), we gave that request a small priority boost, not enough for it to cause preemption, but enough for it to be scheduled next before all equals. We also used that bit to give new clients a small priority boost, similar to FQ_CODEL, such that we favoured short interactive tasks ahead of long running streams. However, this is causing lots of complications with timeslicing where we both want to honour the boost and yet ignore it. Those complications cause unexpected user behaviour (tasks not being timesliced and run concurrently as epxected), and the easiest way to resolve that is to remove the boost. Hopefully, we can find a compromise again if we need to, but in theory timeslicing itself and future more advanced schedulers should give us the interactivity boost we seek. Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/lateslice Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507152338.7452-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-07drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependencyChris Wilson1-2/+6
We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are allowed to run in parallel and not in strict succession. The real significance though is that this allows us to rearrange groups of WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT linked requests along the single engine, and so can resolve user level inter-batch scheduling dependencies from user semaphores. Fixes: c81471f5e95c ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/submit Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507155109.8892-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-06drm/i915: Propagate error from completed fencesChris Wilson1-1/+3
We need to preserve fatal errors from fences that are being terminated as we hook them up. Fixes: ef4688497512 ("drm/i915: Propagate fence errors") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200506162136.3325-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-03drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request poolChris Wilson1-5/+22
Add a tiny per-engine request mempool so that we should always have a request available for powermanagement allocations from tricky contexts. This reserve is expected to be only used for kernel contexts when barriers must be emitted [almost] without fail. The main consumer for this reserved request is expected to be engine-pm, for which we know that there will always be at least the previous pm request that we can reuse under mempressure (so there should always be a spare request for engine_park()). This is an alternative to using a comparatively bulky mempool, which requires custom handling for both our reserved allocation requirement and to protect our TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache. The advantage of mempool would be that it would allow us to keep a larger per-engine request pool. However, converting over to mempool is straightforward should the need arise. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200402184037.21630-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-23drm/i915: Rely on direct submission to the queueChris Wilson1-2/+0
Drop the pretense of kicking the tasklet (used only for the defunct guc submission backend, it should just take ownership of the submit!) and so remove the bh-kicking from around submission. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-10drm/i915: Mark up racy read of active rq->engineChris Wilson1-3/+5
As a virtual engine may change the rq->engine to point to the active request in flight, we need to warn the compiler that an active request's engine is volatile. [ 95.017686] write (marked) to 0xffff8881e8386b10 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 2: [ 95.018123] execlists_dequeue+0x762/0x2150 [i915] [ 95.018539] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x48/0x60 [i915] [ 95.018955] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xd3/0x170 [i915] [ 95.018986] tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0xa0 [ 95.019016] __do_softirq+0xd7/0x2cd [ 95.019043] irq_exit+0xbe/0xe0 [ 95.019068] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 95.019491] i915_request_retire+0x2c5/0x670 [i915] [ 95.019937] retire_requests+0xa1/0xf0 [i915] [ 95.020348] engine_retire+0xa1/0xe0 [i915] [ 95.020376] process_one_work+0x3b1/0x690 [ 95.020403] worker_thread+0x80/0x670 [ 95.020429] kthread+0x19a/0x1e0 [ 95.020454] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 95.020476] [ 95.020498] read to 0xffff8881e8386b10 of 8 bytes by task 8909 on cpu 3: [ 95.020918] __i915_request_commit+0x177/0x220 [i915] [ 95.021329] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x38c4/0x4e50 [i915] [ 95.021750] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x2c3/0x580 [i915] [ 95.021784] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe4/0x120 [ 95.021809] drm_ioctl+0x297/0x4c7 [ 95.021832] ksys_ioctl+0x89/0xb0 [ 95.021865] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x42/0x60 [ 95.021901] do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x2c0 [ 95.021927] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310142403.5953-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-10drm/i915: Defer semaphore priority bumping to a workqueueChris Wilson1-5/+17
Since the semaphore fence may be signaled from inside an interrupt handler from inside a request holding its request->lock, we cannot then enter into the engine->active.lock for processing the semaphore priority bump as we may traverse our call tree and end up on another held request. CPU 0: [ 2243.218864] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9a/0xb0 [ 2243.218867] i915_schedule_bump_priority+0x49/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218869] semaphore_notify+0x6d/0x98 [i915] [ 2243.218871] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915] [ 2243.218874] ? kmem_cache_free+0x211/0x290 [ 2243.218876] i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218879] dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x3e/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218881] signal_irq_work+0x571/0x690 [i915] [ 2243.218883] irq_work_run_list+0xd7/0x120 [ 2243.218885] irq_work_run+0x1d/0x50 [ 2243.218887] smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x21/0x30 [ 2243.218889] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 CPU 1: [ 2242.173107] _raw_spin_lock+0x8f/0xa0 [ 2242.173110] __i915_request_submit+0x64/0x4a0 [i915] [ 2242.173112] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x8ee/0x2120 [i915] [ 2242.173114] ? i915_sched_lookup_priolist+0x1e3/0x2b0 [i915] [ 2242.173117] execlists_submit_request+0x2e8/0x2f0 [i915] [ 2242.173119] submit_notify+0x8f/0xc0 [i915] [ 2242.173121] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915] [ 2242.173124] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40 [ 2242.173137] i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915] [ 2242.173140] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x16/0x20 [i915] Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1318 Fixes: b7404c7ecb38 ("drm/i915: Bump ready tasks ahead of busywaits") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310101720.9944-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-10drm/i915: Improve the start alignment of bonded pairsChris Wilson1-5/+36
Always wait on the start of the signaler request to reduce the problem of dequeueing the bonded pair too early -- we want both payloads to start at the same time, with no latency, and yet still allow others to make full use of the slack in the system. This reduce the amount of time we spend waiting on the semaphore used to synchronise the start of the bonded payload. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306133852.3420322-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-09drm/i915: Mark racy read of intel_engine_cs.saturatedChris Wilson1-1/+1
[ 3783.276728] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __i915_request_submit [i915] / i915_request_await_dma_fence [i915] [ 3783.276766] [ 3783.276787] write to 0xffff8881f1bc60a0 of 1 bytes by interrupt on cpu 2: [ 3783.277187] __i915_request_submit+0x47e/0x4a0 [i915] [ 3783.277580] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x997/0x2780 [i915] [ 3783.277973] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xd3/0x170 [i915] [ 3783.278006] tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0xa0 [ 3783.278035] __do_softirq+0xd7/0x2cd [ 3783.278063] irq_exit+0xbe/0xe0 [ 3783.278089] do_IRQ+0x51/0x100 [ 3783.278114] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1c [ 3783.278140] finish_task_switch+0x72/0x260 [ 3783.278170] __schedule+0x1e5/0x510 [ 3783.278198] schedule+0x45/0xb0 [ 3783.278226] smpboot_thread_fn+0x23e/0x300 [ 3783.278256] kthread+0x19a/0x1e0 [ 3783.278283] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 3783.278305] [ 3783.278327] read to 0xffff8881f1bc60a0 of 1 bytes by task 19440 on cpu 3: [ 3783.278724] i915_request_await_dma_fence+0x2a6/0x530 [i915] [ 3783.279130] i915_request_await_object+0x2fe/0x470 [i915] [ 3783.279524] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45dc/0x4c20 [i915] [ 3783.279908] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x2c3/0x580 [i915] [ 3783.279940] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe4/0x120 [ 3783.279968] drm_ioctl+0x297/0x4c7 [ 3783.279996] ksys_ioctl+0x89/0xb0 [ 3783.280021] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x42/0x60 [ 3783.280047] do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x2c0 [ 3783.280074] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309132726.28358-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-07drm/i915: Do not poison i915_request.link on removalChris Wilson1-1/+1
Do not poison the timeline link on the i915_request to allow both forward/backward list traversal under RCU. [ 9759.139229] RIP: 0010:active_request+0x2a/0x90 [i915] [ 9759.139240] Code: 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 48 83 c5 60 e8 49 de dc e0 48 8b 83 e8 01 00 00 48 39 c5 74 12 48 8d 90 20 fe ff ff <48> 8b 80 50 fe ff ff a8 01 74 11 e8 66 20 dd e0 48 89 d8 5b 5d 41 [ 9759.139251] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000014ce80 EFLAGS: 00010012 [ 9759.139260] RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff888817cac040 RCX: 0000000000022000 [ 9759.139267] RDX: deacffffffffff42 RSI: ffff888817cac040 RDI: ffff888851fee900 [ 9759.139275] RBP: ffff888851fee960 R08: 000000000000001a R09: ffffffffa04702e0 [ 9759.139282] R10: ffffffff82187ea0 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 9759.139289] R13: ffffffffa04d5179 R14: ffff8887f994ae40 R15: ffff888857b9a068 [ 9759.139296] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885ed80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 9759.139304] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 9759.139311] CR2: 00007fff5bdec000 CR3: 00000008534fe001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 9759.139318] Call Trace: [ 9759.139325] <IRQ> [ 9759.139389] execlists_reset+0x14d/0x310 [i915] [ 9759.139400] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xf/0x30 [ 9759.139445] ? fwtable_read32+0x90/0x230 [i915] [ 9759.139499] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xf6/0x150 [i915] [ 9759.139508] tasklet_action_common.isra.17+0x32/0xa0 [ 9759.139516] __do_softirq+0x114/0x3dc [ 9759.139525] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x59/0x70 [ 9759.139533] irq_exit+0xa1/0xc0 [ 9759.139540] do_IRQ+0x76/0x150 [ 9759.139547] common_interrupt+0xf/0xf [ 9759.139554] </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306140115.3495686-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-06drm/i915: Assert requests within a context are submitted in orderChris Wilson1-0/+11
Check the flow of requests into the hardware to verify that are submitted in order along their timeline. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306071614.2846708-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-05drm/i915: Return early for await_start on same timelineChris Wilson1-2/+2
Requests within a timeline are ordered by that timeline, so awaiting for the start of a request within the timeline is a no-op. This used to work by falling out of the mutex_trylock() as the signaler and waiter had the same timeline and not returning an error. Fixes: 6a79d848403d ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305134822.2750496-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-05drm/i915: Actually emit the await_startChris Wilson1-1/+1
Fix the inverted test to emit the wait on the end of the previous request if we /haven't/ already. Fixes: 6a79d848403d ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305104210.2619967-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-04drm/i915: Apply i915_request_skip() on submissionChris Wilson1-20/+49
Trying to use i915_request_skip() prior to i915_request_add() causes us to try and fill the ring upto request->postfix, which has not yet been set, and so may cause us to memset() past the end of the ring. Instead of skipping the request immediately, just flag the error on the request (only accepting the first fatal error we see) and then clear the request upon submission. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200304121849.2448028-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-03drm/i915/gem: Check that the context wasn't closed during setupChris Wilson1-46/+8
As setup takes a long time, the user may close the context during the construction of the execbuf. In order to make sure we correctly track all outstanding work with non-persistent contexts, we need to serialise the submission with the context closure and mop up any leaks. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200303080546.1140508-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-28drm/i915/gt: Expose busywait duration to sysfsChris Wilson1-9/+10
We busywait on an inflight request (one that is currently executing on HW, and so might complete quickly) prior to setting up an interrupt and sleeping. The trade off is that we keep an expensive CPU core busy in order to avoid wake up latency: where that trade off should lie is best left to the sysadmin. The busywait mechanism can be compiled out with ./scripts/config --set-val DRM_I915_SPIN_REQUEST 0 The maximum busywait duration can be adjusted per-engine using, /sys/class/drm/card?/engine/*/ms_busywait_duration_ns Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Carbonari <steven.carbonari@intel.com> Tested-by: Steve Carbonari <steven.carbonari@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200228131716.3243616-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-28drm/i915: Protect i915_request_await_start from early waitsChris Wilson1-13/+28
We need to be extremely careful inside i915_request_await_start() as it needs to walk the list of requests in the foreign timeline with very little protection. As we hold our own timeline mutex, we can not nest inside the signaler's timeline mutex, so all that remains is our RCU protection. However, to be safe we need to tell the compiler that we may be traversing the list only under RCU protection, and furthermore we need to start declaring requests as elements of the timeline from their construction. Fixes: 9ddc8ec027a3 ("drm/i915: Eliminate the trylock for awaiting an earlier request") Fixes: 6a79d848403d ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-20drm/i915: remove the other slab_dependenciesMatthew Auld1-11/+0
The real one can be found in i915_scheduler.c. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200220105707.344522-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2020-02-12drm/i915: Poison rings after useChris Wilson1-9/+17
On retiring the request, we should not re-use these elements in the ring (at least not until we fill the ringbuffer and knowingly reuse the space). Leave behind some poison to (hopefully) trap ourselves if we make a mistake. Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211205615.1190127-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-11drm/i915: Disable use of hwsp_cacheline for kernel_contextChris Wilson1-5/+9
Currently on execlists, we use a local hwsp for the kernel_context, rather than the engine's HWSP, as this is the default for execlists. However, seqno wrap requires allocating a new HWSP cacheline, and may require pinning a new HWSP page in the GGTT. This operation requiring pinning in the GGTT is not allowed within the kernel_context timeline, as doing so may require re-entering the kernel_context in order to evict from the GGTT. As we want to avoid requiring a new HWSP for the kernel_context, we can use the permanently pinned engine's HWSP instead. However to do so we must prevent the use of semaphores reading the kernel_context's HWSP, as the use of semaphores do not support rollover onto the same cacheline. Fortunately, the kernel_context is mostly isolated, so unlikely to give benefit to semaphores. Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200210205722.794180-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-05drm/i915: Flush execution tasklets before checking request statusChris Wilson1-1/+2
Rather than flushing the submission tasklets just before we sleep, flush before we check the request status. Ideally this gives us a moment to process the tasklets after sleeping just before we timeout. v2: Compromise by pushing the flush prior to the timeout, but after the check on completion so that we do not further delay the ready client. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205095441.1769599-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-03drm/i915: Initialise basic fence before acquiring seqnoChris Wilson1-7/+14
Inside the intel_timeline_get_seqno(), we currently track the retirement of the old cachelines by listening to the new request. This requires that the new request is ready to be used and so requires a minimum bit of initialisation prior to getting the new seqno. Fixes: b1e3177bd1d8 ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203094152.4150550-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-22drm/i915: Mark the removal of the i915_request from the sched.linkChris Wilson1-0/+2
Keep the rq->fence.flags consistent with the status of the rq->sched.link, and clear the associated bits when decoupling the link on retirement (as we may wish to inspect those flags independent of other state). Fixes: 32ff621fd744 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests") References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-16drm/i915: Keep track of request among the scheduling listsChris Wilson1-1/+3
If we keep track of when the i915_request.sched.link is on the HW runlist, or in the priority queue we can simplify our interactions with the request (such as during rescheduling). This also simplifies the next patch where we introduce a new in-between list, for requests that are ready but neither on the run list or in the queue. v2: Update i915_sched_node.link explanation for current usage where it is a link on both the queue and on the runlists. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-06drm/i915: Merge i915_request.flags with i915_request.fence.flagsChris Wilson1-1/+0
As we already have a flags field buried within i915_request, reuse it! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-23drm/i915: Mark the GEM context link as RCU protectedChris Wilson1-3/+3
The only protection for intel_context.gem_cotext is granted by RCU, so annotate it as a rcu protected pointer and carefully dereference it in the few occasions we need to use it. Fixes: 9f3ccd40acf4 ("drm/i915: Drop GEM context as a direct link from i915_request") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222233558.2201901-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-21drm/i915: Remove i915->kernel_contextChris Wilson1-1/+4
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate address space (for our own protection). Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use. GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context the execution environment on the GPU. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915: Push the use-semaphore marker onto the intel_contextChris Wilson1-5/+3
Instead of rummaging through the intel_context to peek at the GEM context in the middle of request submission to decide whether to use semaphores, store that information on the intel_context itself. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915: Drop GEM context as a direct link from i915_requestChris Wilson1-8/+13
Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to client interfaces and self-contained. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-18drm/i915/gt: Remove direct invocation of breadcrumb signalingChris Wilson1-1/+1
Only signal the breadcrumbs from inside the irq_work, simplifying our interface and calling conventions. The micro-optimisation here is that by always using the irq_work interface, we know we are always inside an irq-off critical section for the breadcrumb signaling and can ellide save/restore of the irq flags. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217095642.3124521-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-17drm/i915/gt: Eliminate the trylock for reading a timeline's hwspChris Wilson1-2/+2
As we stash a pointer to the HWSP cacheline on the request, when reading it we only need confirm that the cacheline is still valid by checking that the request and timeline are still intact. v2: Protect hwsp_cachline with RCU Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217011659.3092130-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-16drm/i915: Eliminate the trylock for awaiting an earlier requestChris Wilson1-18/+21
We currently use an error-prone mutex_trylock to grab another timeline to find an earlier request along it. However, with a bit of a sleight-of-hand, we can reduce the mutex_trylock to a spin_lock on the immediate request and careful pointer chasing to acquire a reference on the previous request. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216165317.2742896-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-13drm/i915: Use EAGAIN for trylock failuresChris Wilson1-1/+1
While not good behaviour, it is, however, established behaviour that we can punt EAGAIN to userspace if we need to retry the ioctl. When trying to acquire a mutex, prefer to use EAGAIN to propagate losing the race so that if it does end up back in userspace, we try again. Fixes: c81471f5e95c ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/800 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213160347.1789004-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-13drm/i915: Introduce new macros for tracingVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota1-18/+5
New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine name with contexts and requests tracing in i915. Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com
2019-12-11drm/i915: Use the i915_device name for identifying our request fencesChris Wilson1-2/+2
Use the dev_name(i915) to identify the requests for debugging, so we can tell different device timelines apart. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211150204.133471-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-11drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fencesChris Wilson1-25/+89
We want the bonded request to have the same scheduler properties as its master so that it is placed at the same depth in the queue. For example, consider we have requests A, B and B', where B & B' are a bonded pair to run in parallel on two engines. A -> B \- B' B will run after A and so may be scheduled on an idle engine and wait on A using a semaphore. B' sees B being executed and so enters the queue on the same engine as A. As B' did not inherit the semaphore-chain from B, it may have higher precedence than A and so preempts execution. However, B' then sits on a semaphore waiting for B, who is waiting for A, who is blocked by B. Ergo B' needs to inherit the scheduler properties from B (i.e. the semaphore chain) so that it is scheduled with the same priority as B and will not be executed ahead of Bs dependencies. Furthermore, to prevent the priorities changing via the expose fence on B', we need to couple in the dependencies for PI. This requires us to relax our sanity-checks that dependencies are strictly in order. v2: Synchronise (B, B') execution on all platforms, regardless of using a scheduler, any no-op syncs should be elided. Fixes: ee1136908e9b ("drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/464 Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-chain Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-semaphore Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191210151332.3902215-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-11Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queuedJani Nikula1-1/+1
Sync up with v5.5-rc1 to get the updated lock_release() API among other things. Fix the conflict reported by Stephen Rothwell [1]. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/20191210093957.5120f717@canb.auug.org.au Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2019-12-06drm/i915: Propagate errors on awaiting already signaled fencesChris Wilson1-2/+6
If we see an already signaled fence that we want to await on, we skip adding to the i915_sw_fence. However, we should pay attention to whether there was an error on that fence and if so propagate it for our future request. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191206160428.1503343-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-27Merge tag 'drm-next-2019-11-27' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drmLinus Torvalds1-135/+100
Pull drm updates from Dave Airlie: "Lots of stuff in here, though it hasn't been too insane this merge apart from dealing with the security fun. uapi: - export different colorspace properties on DP vs HDMI - new fourcc for ARM 16x16 block format - syncobj: allow querying last submitted timeline value - DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN defined as unsigned core: - allow using gem vma manager in ttm - connector/encoder/bridge doc fixes - allow more than 3 encoders for a connector - displayport mst suspend/resume reprobing support - vram lazy unmapping, uniform vram mm and gem vram - edid cleanups + AVI informframe bar info - displayport helpers - dpcd parser added dp_cec: - Allow a connector to be associated with a cec device ttm: - pipelining with no_gpu_wait fix - always keep BOs on the LRU sched: - allow free_job routine to sleep i915: - Block userptr from mappable GTT - i915 perf uapi versioning - OA stream dynamic reconfiguration - make context persistence optional - introduce DRM_I915_UNSTABLE Kconfig - add fake lmem testing under unstable - BT.2020 support for DP MSA - struct mutex elimination - Tigerlake display/PLL/power management improvements - Jasper Lake PCH support - refactor PMU for multiple GPUs - Icelake firmware update - Split out vga + switcheroo code amdgpu: - implement dma-buf import/export without helpers - vega20 RAS enablement - DC i2c over aux fixes - renoir GPU reset - DC HDCP support - BACO support for CI/VI asics - MSI-X support - Arcturus EEPROM support - Arcturus VCN encode support - VCN dynamic powergating on RV/RV2 amdkfd: - add navi12/14/renoir support to kfd radeon: - SI dpm fix ported from amdgpu - fix bad DMA on ppc platforms gma500: - memory leak fixes qxl: - convert to new gem mmap exynos: - build warning fix komeda: - add aclk sysfs attribute v3d: - userspace cleanup uapi change i810: - fix for underflow in dispatch ioctls ast: - refactor show_cursor mgag200: - refactor show_cursor arcgpu: - encoder finding improvements mediatek: - mipi_tx, dsi and partial crtc support for MT8183 SoC - rotation support meson: - add suspend/resume support omap: - misc refactors tegra: - DisplayPort support for Tegra 210, 186 and 194. - IOMMU-backed DMA API fixes panfrost: - fix lockdep issue - simplify devfreq integration rcar-du: - R8A774B1 SoC support - fixes for H2 ES2.0 sun4i: - vcc-dsi regulator support virtio-gpu: - vmexit vs spinlock fix - move to gem shmem helpers - handle large command buffers with cma" * tag 'drm-next-2019-11-27' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm: (1855 commits) drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semaphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10 drm/amdgpu: initialize vm_inv_eng0_sem for gfxhub and mmhub drm/amd/amdgpu/sriov skip RLCG s/r list for arcturus VF. drm/amd/amdgpu/sriov temporarily skip ras,dtm,hdcp for arcturus VF drm/amdgpu/gfx10: re-init clear state buffer after gpu reset merge fix for "ftrace: Rework event_create_dir()" drm/amdgpu: Update Arcturus golden registers drm/amdgpu/gfx10: fix out-of-bound mqd_backup array access drm/amdgpu/gfx10: explicitly wait for cp idle after halt/unhalt Revert "drm/amd/display: enable S/G for RAVEN chip" drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff on original raven drm/amdgpu: remove experimental flag for Navi14 drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff when using register read interface drm/amdgpu/powerplay: properly set PP_GFXOFF_MASK (v2) drm/amdgpu: fix bad DMA from INTERRUPT_CNTL2 drm/radeon: fix bad DMA from INTERRUPT_CNTL2 drm/amd/display: Fix debugfs on MST connectors drm/amdgpu/nv: add asic func for fetching vbios from rom directly drm/amdgpu: put flush_delayed_work at first drm/amdgpu/vcn2.5: fix the enc loop with hw fini ...
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-04-06 03:50:25 +0000