summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-08-06drm/i915/gem: Make caps.scheduler staticChris Wilson1-14/+2
We do not notify userspace when the scheduler capabilities are changed (due to wedging the driver) and as such userspace will expect the caps to be static and unchanging. Make it so, and so we only need to compute our caps once during driver registration. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806124300.24945-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-02drm/i915: Hide unshrinkable context objects from the shrinkerChris Wilson1-0/+58
The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting. By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller). v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc allocations (Tvrtko) v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-03drm/i915/gem: Free pages before rcu-freeing the objectChris Wilson1-6/+12
As we have dropped the final reference to the object, we do not need to wait until after the rcu grace period to drop its pages. We still require struct_mutex to completely unbind the object to release the pages, so we still need a free-worker to manage that from process context. By scheduling the release of pages before waiting for the rcu should mean that we are not trapping those pages from beyond the reach of the shrinker. v2: Pass along the request to skip if the vma is busy to the underlying unbind routine, to avoid checking the reservation underneath the i915->mm.obj_lock which may be used from inside irq context. v3: Flip the bit for unbinding while active, for later convenience. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111035 Fixes: a93615f900bd ("drm/i915: Throw away the active object retirement complexity") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703091726.11690-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-21drm/i915: Throw away the active object retirement complexityChris Wilson1-2/+3
Remove the accumulated optimisations that we have for i915_vma_retire and reduce it to the bare essential of tracking the active object reference. This allows us to only use atomic operations, and so will be able to avoid the struct_mutex requirement. The principal loss here is the shrinker MRU bumping, so now if we have to shrink, we will do so in much more random order and more likely to try and shrink recently used objects. That is a nuisance, but shrinking active objects is a second step we try to avoid and will always be a system-wide performance issue. The other loss is here is in the automatic pruning of the reservation_object when idling. This is not as large an issue as upon reservation_object introduction as now adding new fences into the object replaces already signaled fences, keeping the array compact. But we do lose the auto-expiration of stale fences and unused arrays. That may be a noticeable problem for which we need to re-implement autopruning. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621183801.23252-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-21drm/i915: Remove waiting & retiring from shrinker pathsChris Wilson1-10/+0
i915_gem_wait_for_idle() and i915_retire_requests() introduce a dependency on the timeline->mutex. This is problematic as we want to later perform allocations underneath i915_active.mutex, forming a link between the shrinker, the timeline and active mutexes. Nip this cycle in the bud by removing the acquisition of the timeline mutex (i.e. retiring) from inside the shrinker. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621183801.23252-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-18drm/i915: Skip shrinking already freed pagesChris Wilson1-0/+5
Previously, we wanted to shrink the pages of freed objects before they were finally RCU collected. However, by removing the struct_mutex serialisation around the active reference, we need to acquire an extra reference around the wait. Unfortunately this means that we have to skip objects that are waiting RCU collection. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110937 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618074153.16055-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-14drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switchChris Wilson1-11/+6
We need to keep the context image pinned in memory until after the GPU has finished writing into it. Since it continues to write as we signal the final breadcrumb, we need to keep it pinned until the request after it is complete. Currently we know the order in which requests execute on each engine, and so to remove that presumption we need to identify a request/context-switch we know must occur after our completion. Any request queued after the signal must imply a context switch, for simplicity we use a fresh request from the kernel context. The sequence of operations for keeping the context pinned until saved is: - On context activation, we preallocate a node for each physical engine the context may operate on. This is to avoid allocations during unpinning, which may be from inside FS_RECLAIM context (aka the shrinker) - On context deactivation on retirement of the last active request (which is before we know the context has been saved), we add the preallocated node onto a barrier list on each engine - On engine idling, we emit a switch to kernel context. When this switch completes, we know that all previous contexts must have been saved, and so on retiring this request we can finally unpin all the contexts that were marked as deactivated prior to the switch. We can enhance this in future by flushing all the idle contexts on a regular heartbeat pulse of a switch to kernel context, which will also be used to check for hung engines. v2: intel_context_active_acquire/_release Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-14drm/i915: update with_intel_runtime_pm to use the rpm structureDaniele Ceraolo Spurio1-4/+4
Matching the underlying get/put functions. Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-06-14drm/i915: update rpm_get/put to use the rpm structureDaniele Ceraolo Spurio1-2/+2
The functions where internally already only using the structure, so we need to just flip the interface. v2: rebase Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-06-12drm/i915: kerneldoc warnings squelchedChris Wilson1-1/+1
drivers/gpu/drm/i915//gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'shrink' not described in 'i915_gem_shrink' drivers/gpu/drm/i915//gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:142: warning: Excess function parameter 'flags' description in 'i915_gem_shrink' drivers/gpu/drm/i915//intel_display.c:13443: warning: Function parameter or member '_state' not described in 'intel_atomic_check' drivers/gpu/drm/i915//intel_display.c:13443: warning: Excess function parameter 'state' description in 'intel_atomic_check' Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190612151311.30295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-12drm/i915: Combine unbound/bound list tracking for objectsChris Wilson1-17/+13
With async binding, we don't want to manage a bound/unbound list as we may end up running before we even acquire the pages. All that is required is keeping track of shrinkable objects, so reduce it to the minimum list. Fixes: 6951e5893b48 ("drm/i915: Move GEM object domain management from struct_mutex to local") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190612105720.30310-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-10drm/i915: Promote i915->mm.obj_lock to be irqsafeChris Wilson1-18/+20
The intent is to be able to update the mm.lists from inside an irqsoff section (e.g. from a softirq rcu workqueue), ergo we need to make the i915->mm.obj_lock irqsafe. v2: can_discard_pages() ensures we are shrinkable v3: Beware shadowing of 'flags' Fixes: 3b4fa9640ccd ("drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction list") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110869 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190610145430.17717-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-31drm/i915: Report all objects with allocated pages to the shrinkerChris Wilson1-22/+6
Currently, we try to report to the shrinker the precise number of objects (pages) that are available to be reaped at this moment. This requires searching all objects with allocated pages to see if they fulfill the search criteria, and this count is performed quite frequently. (The shrinker tries to free ~128 pages on each invocation, before which we count all the objects; counting takes longer than unbinding the objects!) If we take the pragmatic view that with sufficient desire, all objects are eventually reapable (they become inactive, or no longer used as framebuffer etc), we can simply return the count of pinned pages maintained during get_pages/put_pages rather than walk the lists every time. The downside is that we may (slightly) over-report the number of objects/pages we could shrink and so penalize ourselves by shrinking more than required. This is mitigated by keeping the order in which we shrink objects such that we avoid penalizing active and frequently used objects, and if memory is so tight that we need to free them we would need to anyway. v2: Only expose shrinkable objects to the shrinker; a small reduction in not considering stolen and foreign objects. v3: Restore the tracking from a "backup" copy from before the gem/ split Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-31drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction listChris Wilson1-12/+10
Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk. If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking. Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-28drm/i915: Move more GEM objects under gem/Chris Wilson1-0/+555
Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk