summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-11-05drm/i915/display: Use initial_fastset_check() to compute and apply the ↵José Roberto de Souza1-4/+0
initial PSR state Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added initial_fastset_check() hook. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2020-10-09drm/i915/display: Program PSR2 selective fetch registersJosé Roberto de Souza1-2/+8
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes. The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step. v2: - removed warn on when no plane is visible in state - removed calculations using plane damaged area in intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch() v3: - do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is shifted v4: - only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL v5: - not masking bits for cursor BSpec: 55229 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
2020-08-17drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2 selective fetchJosé Roberto de Souza1-0/+5
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL). This feature consists in software programming registers with the damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel, saving even more power. But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future patch. Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added. v3: - calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase (Ville) BSpec: 55229 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2020-05-14drm/i915/psr: Use new DP VSC SDP compute routine on PSRGwan-gyeong Mun1-2/+4
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR, it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine. Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP, the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure member variable on struct i915_psr. In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update() function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state argument. There are no changes to PSR mechanism. v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp v4: Rebased v8: Rebased v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to infoframes.enable. It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP. v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute. v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2020-02-24drm/i915/psr: Force PSR probe only after full initializationJosé Roberto de Souza1-0/+1
Commit 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is all initialized. Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens. Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not allow PSR to be enabled. v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv v4: - renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does - moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the functions calls happening between the old and the new function call will cause issue Fixes: 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151 Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2020-01-08drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSRJosé Roberto de Souza1-0/+5
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset() is always false. To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot process plus the power savings that PSR brings. It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when computing encoder state. v2: - removed function return - change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check v3: - replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253 Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-22drm/i915: Do not unmask PSR interruption in IRQ postinstallJosé Roberto de Souza1-1/+0
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move the call to intel_psr_enable_source(). v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas) Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-06-17drm/i915: move modesetting core code under display/Jani Nikula1-0/+40
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving modesetting core code. display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this is, again, a surprisingly clean operation. v2: - don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville) - use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com