| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Conor McLoughlin <conor.mcloughlin@intel.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: qat-linux@intel.com
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The following KASAN warning was printed when booting a 64-bit kernel
on some systems with Intel CPUs:
[ 44.512826] ==================================================================
[ 44.520165] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in find_first_bit+0xb0/0xc0
[ 44.526786] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88041e02fc50 by task kworker/0:2/124
[ 44.535253] CPU: 0 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G X --------- --- 4.18.0-12.el8.x86_64+debug #1
[ 44.545858] Hardware name: Intel Corporation PURLEY/PURLEY, BIOS BKVDTRL1.86B.0005.D08.1712070559 12/07/2017
[ 44.555682] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
[ 44.560043] Call Trace:
[ 44.562502] dump_stack+0x9a/0xe9
[ 44.565832] print_address_description+0x65/0x22e
[ 44.570683] ? find_first_bit+0xb0/0xc0
[ 44.570689] kasan_report.cold.6+0x92/0x19f
[ 44.578726] find_first_bit+0xb0/0xc0
[ 44.578737] adf_probe+0x9eb/0x19a0 [qat_c62x]
[ 44.578751] ? adf_remove+0x110/0x110 [qat_c62x]
[ 44.591490] ? mark_held_locks+0xc8/0x140
[ 44.591498] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x30/0x30
[ 44.591505] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x381/0x570
[ 44.604418] ? adf_remove+0x110/0x110 [qat_c62x]
[ 44.604427] local_pci_probe+0xd4/0x180
[ 44.604432] ? pci_device_shutdown+0x110/0x110
[ 44.617386] work_for_cpu_fn+0x51/0xa0
[ 44.621145] process_one_work+0x8fe/0x16e0
[ 44.625263] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2d0/0x2d0
[ 44.629799] ? lock_acquire+0x14c/0x400
[ 44.633645] ? move_linked_works+0x12e/0x2a0
[ 44.637928] worker_thread+0x536/0xb50
[ 44.641690] ? __kthread_parkme+0xb6/0x180
[ 44.645796] ? process_one_work+0x16e0/0x16e0
[ 44.650160] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0
[ 44.653400] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0
[ 44.658457] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 44.663557] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[ 44.668350] page:ffffea0010780bc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
[ 44.676356] flags: 0x17ffffc0000000()
[ 44.680023] raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffffea0010780bc8 ffffea0010780bc8 0000000000000000
[ 44.687769] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 44.695510] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[ 44.702578] Memory state around the buggy address:
[ 44.707372] ffff88041e02fb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 44.714593] ffff88041e02fb80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 44.721810] >ffff88041e02fc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2
[ 44.729028] ^
[ 44.734864] ffff88041e02fc80: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 44.742082] ffff88041e02fd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 44.749299] ==================================================================
Looking into the code:
int ret, bar_mask;
:
for_each_set_bit(bar_nr, (const unsigned long *)&bar_mask,
It is casting a 32-bit integer pointer to a 64-bit unsigned long
pointer. There are two problems here. First, the 32-bit pointer address
may not be 64-bit aligned. Secondly, it is accessing an extra 4 bytes.
This is fixed by changing the bar_mask type to unsigned long.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Remove leading zeros in pci function number to be consistent
with output from lspci.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Marcos Oltra <pablo.marcos.oltra@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Before VF sends a signal to PF it should check if PF
is still running.
Tested-by: Suman Bangalore Sathyanarayana <sumanx.bangalore.sathyanarayana@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
It returns always zero anyway.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add support for c3xxx accelerator Virtual Function
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
