summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-06-14ACPI: sysfs: Drop four redundant return statementsClayton Casciato1-8/+0
Signed-off-by: Clayton Casciato <majortomtosourcecontrol@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14ACPI: video: Drop three redundant return statementsClayton Casciato1-6/+0
Signed-off-by: Clayton Casciato <majortomtosourcecontrol@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14ACPI: sleep: Fix acpi_pm_pre_suspend() kernel-docYang Li1-1/+1
Fix function name in sleep.c kernel-doc comment to remove a warning found by running make W=1 LLVM=1. drivers/acpi/sleep.c:413: warning: expecting prototype for acpi_pre_suspend(). Prototype was for acpi_pm_pre_suspend() instead. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14ACPI: processor_throttling: Remove redundant initialization of 'obj'Yang Li1-1/+1
'obj' is being initialized, however this value is never read as 'obj' is assigned an updated value later. Remove the redundant initialization. Clean up clang warning: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:409:20: warning: Value stored to 'obj' during its initialization is never read [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores] Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14Merge back ACPI power management material for v5.14.Rafael J. Wysocki8-71/+79
2021-06-11ACPI: utils: Introduce acpi_get_local_address()Calvin Johnson1-0/+14
Introduce a wrapper around the _ADR evaluation. Signed-off-by: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@arm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11Merge back 'acpi-bus' material for v5.14.Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+0
2021-06-11Merge branch 'acpi-bus'Rafael J. Wysocki1-19/+8
* acpi-bus: ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag
2021-06-10ACPI: scan: initialize local variable to avoid garbage being returnedColin Ian King1-1/+1
In the unlikely event that there are no callback calls made in acpi_walk_dep_device_list(), local variable ret will be returned as an uninitialized value. Clean up static analysis warnings by ensuring ret is initialized. Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") Fixes: a9e10e587304 ("ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-10ACPI: Remove redundant clearing of context->ret.pointer from acpi_run_osc()Hans de Goede1-2/+0
context->ret.pointer already gets set to NULL at the beginning of acpi_run_osc() and it only gets assigned a new value in the success path near the end of acpi_run_osc(), so the clearing of context->ret.pointer (when status != AE_OK) at the end of acpi_run_osc() is redundant since it will always already be NULL when status != AE_OK. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-10ACPI: Add \_SB._OSC bit for PRMErik Kaneda1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-10ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the PlatformRtMechanism subtypeErik Kaneda5-0/+320
Platform Runtime Mechanism (PRM) is a firmware interface that exposes a set of binary executables that can either be called from the AML interpreter or device drivers by bypassing the AML interpreter. This change implements the AML interpreter path. According to the specification [1], PRM services are listed in an ACPI table called the PRMT. This patch parses module and handler information listed in the PRMT and registers the PlatformRtMechanism OpRegion handler before ACPI tables are loaded. Each service is defined by a 16-byte GUID and called from writing a 26-byte ASL buffer containing the identifier to a FieldUnit object defined inside a PlatformRtMechanism OperationRegion. OperationRegion (PRMR, PlatformRtMechanism, 0, 26) Field (PRMR, BufferAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { PRMF, 208 // Write to this field to invoke the OperationRegion Handler } The 26-byte ASL buffer is defined as the following: Byte Offset Byte Length Description ============================================================= 0 1 PRM OperationRegion handler status 1 8 PRM service status 9 1 PRM command 10 16 PRM handler GUID The ASL caller fills out a 26-byte buffer containing the PRM command and the PRM handler GUID like so: /* Local0 is the PRM data buffer */ Local0 = buffer (26){} /* Create byte fields over the buffer */ CreateByteField (Local0, 0x9, CMD) CreateField (Local0, 0x50, 0x80, GUID) /* Fill in the command and data fields of the data buffer */ CMD = 0 // run command GUID = ToUUID("xxxx-xx-xxx-xxxx") /* * Invoke PRM service with an ID that matches GUID and save the * result. */ Local0 = (\_SB.PRMT.PRMF = Local0) Byte offset 0 - 8 are written by the handler as a status passed back to AML and used by ASL like so: /* Create byte fields over the buffer */ CreateByteField (Local0, 0x0, PSTA) CreateQWordField (Local0, 0x1, USTA) In this ASL code, PSTA contains a status from the OperationRegion and USTA contains a status from the PRM service. The 26-byte buffer is recieved by acpi_platformrt_space_handler. This handler will look at the command value and the handler guid and take the approperiate actions. Command value Action ===================================================================== 0 Run the PRM service indicated by the PRM handler GUID (bytes 10-26) 1 Prevent PRM runtime updates from happening to the service's parent module 2 Allow PRM updates from happening to the service's parent module This patch enables command value 0. Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Platform%20Runtime%20Mechanism%20-%20with%20legal%20notice.pdf # [1] Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-09ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ overrideHui Wang1-1/+8
The laptop keyboard doesn't work on many MEDION notebooks, but the keyboard works well under Windows and Unix. Through debugging, we found this log in the dmesg: ACPI: IRQ 1 override to edge, high pnp 00:03: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0303 (active) And we checked the IRQ definition in the DSDT, it is: IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Exclusive, ) {1} So the BIOS defines the keyboard IRQ to Level_Low, but the Linux kernel override it to Edge_High. If the Linux kernel is modified to skip the IRQ override, the keyboard will work normally. From the existing comment in acpi_dev_get_irqresource(), the override function only needs to be called when IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() is used to populate the resource descriptor, and according to Section 6.4.2.1 of ACPI 6.4 [1], if IRQ() is empty or IRQNoFlags() is used, the IRQ is High true, edge sensitive and non-shareable. ACPICA also assumes that to be the case (see acpi_rs_set_irq[] in rsirq.c). In accordance with the above, check 3 additional conditions (EdgeSensitive, ActiveHigh and Exclusive) when deciding whether or not to treat an ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ resource as "legacy", in which case the IRQ override is applicable to it. Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/06_Device_Configuration/Device_Configuration.html#irq-descriptor # [1] BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031 BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909814 Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reported-by: Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net> Tested-by: Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com> [ rjw: Subject rewrite, changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-09ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flagMika Westerberg1-19/+8
Commit 719e1f561afb ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear") makes acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control() not only query the platforms capabilities but it also commits the result back to the firmware to report which capabilities are supported by the OS back to the firmware On certain systems the BIOS loads SSDT tables dynamically based on the capabilities the OS claims to support. However, on these systems the _OSC actually clears some of the bits (under certain conditions) so what happens is that now when we call the _OSC twice the second time we pass the cleared values and that results errors like below to appear on the system log: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.PR00._CPC], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210105/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.PR01._CPC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) In addition the ACPI 6.4 spec says following [1]: If the OS declares support of a feature in the Support Field in one call to _OSC, then it must preserve the set state of that bit (declaring support for that feature) in all subsequent calls. Based on the above we can fix the issue by passing the same set of capabilities to the platform wide _OSC in both calls regardless of the query flag. While there drop the context.ret.length checks which were wrong to begin with (as the length is number of bytes not elements). This is already checked in acpi_run_osc() that also returns an error in that case. Includes fixes by Hans de Goede. [1] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/06_Device_Configuration/Device_Configuration.html#sequence-of-osc-calls BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963717 Fixes: 719e1f561afb ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear") Cc: 5.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.12+ Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-08ACPI/IORT: Enable stall support for platform devicesJean-Philippe Brucker1-1/+3
Copy the "Stall supported" bit, that tells whether a named component supports stall, into the dma-can-stall device property. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526161927.24268-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of ACPI deviceDaniel Scally1-0/+35
In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from" the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()Daniel Scally3-20/+53
The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each dependent device of the input. Extend it to accept a callback which can be applied to all the dependencies in acpi_dep_list. Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper, passing a callback that applies the same dependency reduction. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> # for platform/surface parts Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: sysfs: Fix a buffer overrun problem with description_show()Krzysztof Wilczyński1-1/+1
Currently, a device description can be obtained using ACPI, if the _STR method exists for a particular device, and then exposed to the userspace via a sysfs object as a string value. If the _STR method is available for a given device then the data (usually a Unicode string) is read and stored in a buffer (of the ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER type) with a pointer to said buffer cached in the struct acpi_device_pnp for later access. The description_show() function is responsible for exposing the device description to the userspace via a corresponding sysfs object and internally calls the utf16s_to_utf8s() function with a pointer to the buffer that contains the Unicode string so that it can be converted from UTF16 encoding to UTF8 and thus allowing for the value to be safely stored and later displayed. When invoking the utf16s_to_utf8s() function, the description_show() function also sets a limit of the data that can be saved into a provided buffer as a result of the character conversion to be a total of PAGE_SIZE, and upon completion, the utf16s_to_utf8s() function returns an integer value denoting the number of bytes that have been written into the provided buffer. Following the execution of the utf16s_to_utf8s() a newline character will be added at the end of the resulting buffer so that when the value is read in the userspace through the sysfs object then it would include newline making it more accessible when working with the sysfs file system in the shell, etc. Normally, this wouldn't be a problem, but if the function utf16s_to_utf8s() happens to return the number of bytes written to be precisely PAGE_SIZE, then we would overrun the buffer and write the newline character outside the allotted space which can have undefined consequences or result in a failure. To fix this buffer overrun, ensure that there always is enough space left for the newline character to be safely appended. Fixes: d1efe3c324ea ("ACPI: Add new sysfs interface to export device description") Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: LPSS: Use kstrtol() instead of simple_strtol()Liu Shixin1-7/+6
The simple_strtol() function is not reliable in some situation, since it does not check for the range overflow. Use kstrtol() instead. While at it, modify the code to avoid evaluating _SEM unnecessarily if uid_str is NULL or kstrtol() fails to convert that string to a nonzero number. Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Check uid right after calling kstrtol() ] [ rjw: Rewrite subject and changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: tables: FPDT: Add missing acpi_put_table() in acpi_init_fpdt()Jing Xiangfeng1-1/+3
acpi_init_fpdt() forgets to call acpi_put_table() in an error path. Add the missing function call to fix it. Fixes: d1eb86e59be0 ("ACPI: tables: introduce support for FPDT table") Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: tables: PPTT: Populate cache-id if provided by firmwareJames Morse1-4/+14
ACPI 6.4 adds a 'cache id' to the PPTT Cache Type Structure. Copy this property across into the cacheinfo leaf when it was provided by firmware. This value gets exposed to userspace as: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cache/index*/id. See the "Cache IDs" section of Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst. Co-authored-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: OSL: Use DEFINE_RES_IO_NAMED() to simplify codeZhen Lei1-6/+1
No functional change. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: bus: Call kobject_put() in acpi_init() error pathHanjun Guo1-0/+1
Although the system will not be in a good condition or it will not boot if acpi_bus_init() fails, it is still necessary to put the kobject in the error path before returning to avoid leaking memory. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: bus: Remove unneeded assignmentHanjun Guo1-3/+1
When acpi_kobj is NULL already, assigning NULL to it is redundant, so don't do that. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: Remove the macro PREFIX "ACPI: "Hanjun Guo1-2/+0
Now the macro PREFIX for ACPI message printing is not used anymore, remove it. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: sleep: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-9/+9
Intoduce pr_fmt() and use pr_*() macros to replace printk(), also remove all the PREFIX for pr_*() calls to generate a unified format string for prefix. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: sbs: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-6/+6
Using pr_fmt() and pr_*() macros to unify the message printing. While at it, fix the obvious coding style issue when scanning the code. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Unify the log message printingHanjun Guo1-5/+6
The log messages in scan.c is not in consistency, some pr_*() calls have PREFIX, but some don't. Using pr_fmt() and remove PREFIX, also replace printk() with pr_*() macro to unify the message printing. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: sbshc: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-4/+4
Using pr_fmt() and pr_*() macros to unify the message printing. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: sysfs: Cleanup message printingHanjun Guo1-5/+3
We have pr_fmt() in sysfs.c but we still use pr_err(PREFIX ...) which is wrong, remove the duplicated PREFIX and also using pr_* to replace printk to simlify the code. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: reboot: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-1/+3
The meesage printing in this file is mixed with pr_*() and printk() but with no prefix and no pr_fmt() defined. Intoduce pr_fmt() and use pr_*() macros to replace printk(), to generate a unified format string for prefix. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: processor_throttling: Cleanup the printing messagesHanjun Guo1-34/+26
The log messages in processor_throttling.c is not in consistency, we have some printk() calls with PREFIX, but some are not; also we use pr_*() functions without prefix. So add pr_fmt() and unify them with pr_*() functions. While at it, fix some obvious coding style issues when going through the functions. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: processor_perflib: Cleanup print messagesHanjun Guo1-20/+18
The log messages in processor_perflib.c is not in consistency, we have some printk() calls with PREFIX, but some are not; we use pr_*() functions without prefix. So add pr_fmt() and unify them with pr_*() functions. While at it, fix some obvious coding style issues when going through the functions. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: processor_thermal: Remove unused PREFIX for printingHanjun Guo1-2/+0
The PREFIX "ACPI: " is not used in this file, remove it. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: pci_root: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-1/+3
In acpi_pci_root_add(), pr_info() is added with PREFIX, but in acpi_pci_root_remap_iospace() the pr_info() with no PREFIX. Introduce pr_fmt() to unify the message printing and remove the PREFIX. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: osl: Remove the duplicated PREFIX for message printingHanjun Guo1-2/+2
We have pr_fmt() in osl.c, so pr_err(PREFIX ...) is duplicated and wrong, fix it by removing the PREFIX. Also remove the using of PREFIX in WARN() and just add the plain "ACPI: " in message to keep it unchanged. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: nvs: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-3/+5
The message printing in nvs.c is mixed with pr_*() and printk(), but with no prefix and also no pr_fmt() defined. Introduce pr_fmt() and use pr_*() macros to replace printk(), to generate a unified format string for prefix. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: glue: Clean up the printing messagesHanjun Guo1-20/+9
Remove the in house ACPI_GLUE_DEBUG and its related debug message printing, using pr_debug() instead. While at it, replace printk() with pr_* to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: event: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk()Hanjun Guo1-2/+4
Introduce pr_fmt() and replace direct printk() invocation with the matching pr_*() call to prepare for removing PREFIX. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: bus: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk()Hanjun Guo1-2/+2
In commit ee98460b2ff9 ("ACPI: bus: Clean up printing messages"), direct printk() invocations was replaced with the matching pr_*() calls, but the left two printk() calls was merged at the same time with the above cleaup commit, so we missed them for cleanup, let's replace them now and we can remove the use of PREFIX later. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: blacklist: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-4/+5
Intoduce pr_fmt() and use pr_*() macros to replace printk(), to generate a unified format string for prefix, then remove the PREFIX. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: cmos_rtc: Using pr_fmt() and remove PREFIXHanjun Guo1-2/+4
Introduce pr_fmt() and remove printk PREFIX to unify the log message printing. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07Revert "ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it"Zhang Rui1-3/+1
Commit 95722237cb2a ("ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it") puts the FACS table during initialization. But the hardware signature bits in the FACS table need to be accessed, after every hibernation, to compare with the original hardware signature. So there is no reason to release the FACS table mapping after initialization. This reverts commit 95722237cb2ae4f7b73471058cdb19e8f4057c93. An alternative solution is to use acpi_gbl_FACS variable instead, which is mapped by the ACPICA core and never released. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212277 Reported-by: Stephan Hohe <sth.dev@tejp.de> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: 5.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Constify acpi_dma_supported() helper functionAndy Shevchenko1-1/+1
Constify arguments to acpi_dma_supported(). The function doesn't need to change the content of the passed argument and when it's const it allows to supply the result of other functions that may return a pointer to a constant object. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Subject edit ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPICA: Add support for PlatformRtMechanism OperationRegion handlerErik Kaneda4-2/+61
ACPICA commit cdf48b141d7da38e47fe4020310033ddd1971f9e Writing a buffer to a PlatformRtMechanism FieldUnit invokes a bidirectional transaction. The input buffer contains 26 bytes containing 9 bytes of status, a command byte and a 16-byte UUID. This change will will simply pass this incoming buffer to a handler registered by the OS. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/cdf48b14 Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPICA: Use ACPI_FALLTHROUGHWei Ming Chen1-1/+1
ACPICA commit 2296edd39b4ce2d2dd691c1f309c4da00843ecc9 Replace /* FALLTHROUGH */ comment with ACPI_FALLTHROUGH Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/2296edd3 Signed-off-by: Wei Ming Chen <jj251510319013@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPICA: Fix memory leak caused by _CID repair functionErik Kaneda1-0/+7
ACPICA commit 180cb53963aa876c782a6f52cc155d951b26051a According to the ACPI spec, _CID returns a package containing hardware ID's. Each element of an ASL package contains a reference count from the parent package as well as the element itself. Name (TEST, Package() { "String object" // this package element has a reference count of 2 }) A memory leak was caused in the _CID repair function because it did not decrement the reference count created by the package. Fix the memory leak by calling acpi_ut_remove_reference on _CID package elements that represent a hardware ID (_HID). Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/180cb539 Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-31ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki4-37/+14
Make turning off unused power resources (after the enumeration of devices and during system-wide resume from S3) more straightforward by using the observation that the power resource state stored in struct acpi_power_resource can be used to determine whether or not the give power resource has any users. Namely, when the state of the power resource is unknown, its _STA method has never been evaluated (or the evaluation of it has failed) and its _ON and _OFF methods have never been executed (or they have failed to execute), so for all practical purposes it can be assumed to have no users (or to be unusable). Therefore, instead of checking the number of power resource users, it is sufficient to check if its state is known. Moreover, if the last known state of a given power resource is "off", it is not necessary to turn it off, because it has been used to initialize the power state or the wakeup power resources list of at least one device and either its _STA method has returned 0 ("off"), or its _OFF method has been successfully executed already. Accordingly, modify acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to do the above checks (which are suitable for both uses of it) instead of using the number of power resource users or evaluating its _STA method, drop its argument (which is not useful any more) and update its callers. Also drop the users field from struct acpi_power_resource as it is not useful any more. Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-31ACPI: power: Save the last known state of each power resourceRafael J. Wysocki1-18/+32
Currently, there are two ways to check the state of an ACPI power resource and they may not be consistent with each other. The first one is to evaluate the power resource's _STA object and the other one is to check its reference counter value. However, on some systems the value returned by _STA may not be consistent with the value of the power resource's reference counter (for example, on some systems it returns the same value every time for certain power resources). Moreover, evaluating _STA is unnecessary overhead for a power resource for which it has been evaluated already or whose state is otherwise known, because either the _ON or the _OFF method has been executed for it. For this reason, save the state of each power resource in its struct acpi_power_resource object and use the saved value whenever its state needs to be checked, except when its stats is unknown, in which case the _STA method is evaluated for it and the value returned by that method is saved as the last known state of the power resource. Moreover, drop the power resource _STA method evaluation from acpi_add_power_resource(), so as to avoid doing that unnecessarily for power resources that will never be used. Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-31ACPI: power: Use u8 as the power resource state data typeRafael J. Wysocki1-12/+15
Use u8 as the data type for representing the state of an ACPI power resource. It is s not necessary to use int for that and because subsequent changes are going to use ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN, it is better to adjust the data type so that the "unknown" state is represented by the "all ones" value. While at it, clean up acpi_power_get_state() somewhat. No intentional functional impact. Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>