summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-10-26ACPI: PM: sleep: Do not set suspend_ops unnecessarilyRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+7
If none of the S1 - S3 sleep states is supported, it is not necessary to register suspend_ops, so don't do that then. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-29Merge branches 'acpi-dptf' and 'acpi-messages'Rafael J. Wysocki1-9/+9
* acpi-dptf: ACPI: DPTF: Add battery participant for Intel SoCs * acpi-messages: ACPI: Remove the macro PREFIX "ACPI: " ACPI: sleep: Unify the message printing ACPI: sbs: Unify the message printing ACPI: scan: Unify the log message printing ACPI: sbshc: Unify the message printing ACPI: sysfs: Cleanup message printing ACPI: reboot: Unify the message printing ACPI: processor_throttling: Cleanup the printing messages ACPI: processor_perflib: Cleanup print messages ACPI: processor_thermal: Remove unused PREFIX for printing ACPI: pci_root: Unify the message printing ACPI: osl: Remove the duplicated PREFIX for message printing ACPI: nvs: Unify the message printing ACPI: glue: Clean up the printing messages ACPI: event: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk() ACPI: bus: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk() ACPI: blacklist: Unify the message printing ACPI: cmos_rtc: Using pr_fmt() and remove PREFIX
2021-06-14ACPI: sleep: Fix acpi_pm_pre_suspend() kernel-docYang Li1-1/+1
Fix function name in sleep.c kernel-doc comment to remove a warning found by running make W=1 LLVM=1. drivers/acpi/sleep.c:413: warning: expecting prototype for acpi_pre_suspend(). Prototype was for acpi_pm_pre_suspend() instead. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14Merge back ACPI power management material for v5.14.Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
2021-06-07ACPI: sleep: Unify the message printingHanjun Guo1-9/+9
Intoduce pr_fmt() and use pr_*() macros to replace printk(), also remove all the PREFIX for pr_*() calls to generate a unified format string for prefix. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07Revert "ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it"Zhang Rui1-3/+1
Commit 95722237cb2a ("ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it") puts the FACS table during initialization. But the hardware signature bits in the FACS table need to be accessed, after every hibernation, to compare with the original hardware signature. So there is no reason to release the FACS table mapping after initialization. This reverts commit 95722237cb2ae4f7b73471058cdb19e8f4057c93. An alternative solution is to use acpi_gbl_FACS variable instead, which is mapped by the ACPICA core and never released. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212277 Reported-by: Stephan Hohe <sth.dev@tejp.de> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: 5.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-31ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Make turning off unused power resources (after the enumeration of devices and during system-wide resume from S3) more straightforward by using the observation that the power resource state stored in struct acpi_power_resource can be used to determine whether or not the give power resource has any users. Namely, when the state of the power resource is unknown, its _STA method has never been evaluated (or the evaluation of it has failed) and its _ON and _OFF methods have never been executed (or they have failed to execute), so for all practical purposes it can be assumed to have no users (or to be unusable). Therefore, instead of checking the number of power resource users, it is sufficient to check if its state is known. Moreover, if the last known state of a given power resource is "off", it is not necessary to turn it off, because it has been used to initialize the power state or the wakeup power resources list of at least one device and either its _STA method has returned 0 ("off"), or its _OFF method has been successfully executed already. Accordingly, modify acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to do the above checks (which are suitable for both uses of it) instead of using the number of power resource users or evaluating its _STA method, drop its argument (which is not useful any more) and update its callers. Also drop the users field from struct acpi_power_resource as it is not useful any more. Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-24ACPI: power: Refine turning off unused power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Commit 7e4fdeafa61f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally") dropped the power resource state check from acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources(), because according to the ACPI specification (e.g. ACPI 6.4, Section 7.2.2) the OS "may run the _OFF method repeatedly, even if the resource is already off". However, it turns out that some systems do not follow the specification in this particular respect and that commit introduced boot issues on them, so refine acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to only turn off power resources without any users after device enumeration and restore its previous behavior in the system-wide resume path. Fixes: 7e4fdeafa61f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally") Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/declaring-a-power-resource-object.html#off BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213019 Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reported-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Reported-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-17ACPI: PM: s2idle: Move x86-specific code to the x86 directoryRafael J. Wysocki1-441/+12
Some code in drivers/acpi/sleep.c (which is regarded as a generic file) related to suspend-to-idle support has grown direct dependencies on x86, but in fact it has been specific to x86 (which is the only user of it) anyway for a long time. For this reason, move that code to a separate file under acpi/x86/ and make it build and run as before under the right conditions. While at it, rename a vendor checking function in that code and consistently use acpi_handle_debug() for printing debug-related information in it. No expected functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-16ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add AMD support to handle _DSMShyam Sundar S K1-9/+157
Initial support for S2Idle based on the Intel implementation [1] does not work for AMD as the BIOS implementation for ACPI methods like the _DSM are not standardized. So, the way in which the UUID's were parsed and the ACPI packages were retrieved out of the ACPI objects are not the same between Intel and AMD. Add AMD support for S2Idle to parse the UUID, evaluate the _DSM methods, prepare the Idle constraint list etc. Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf # [1] Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-06-02Merge tag 'acpi-5.8-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These update the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision 20200430, fix several reference counting errors related to ACPI tables, add _Exx / _Lxx support to the GED driver, add a new acpi_evaluate_reg() helper, add new DPTF battery participant driver and extend the DPFT power participant driver, improve the handling of memory failures in the APEI code, add a blacklist entry to the backlight driver, update the PMIC driver and the processor idle driver, fix two kobject reference count leaks, and make a few janitory changes. Specifics: - Update the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision 20200430: - Move acpi_gbl_next_cmd_num definition (Erik Kaneda). - Ignore AE_ALREADY_EXISTS status in the disassembler when parsing create operators (Erik Kaneda). - Add status checks to the dispatcher (Erik Kaneda). - Fix required parameters for _NIG and _NIH (Erik Kaneda). - Make acpi_protocol_lengths static (Yue Haibing). - Fix ACPI table reference counting errors in several places, mostly in error code paths (Hanjun Guo). - Extend the Generic Event Device (GED) driver to support _Exx and _Lxx handler methods (Ard Biesheuvel). - Add new acpi_evaluate_reg() helper and modify the ACPI PCI hotplug code to use it (Hans de Goede). - Add new DPTF battery participant driver and make the DPFT power participant driver create more sysfs device attributes (Srinivas Pandruvada). - Improve the handling of memory failures in APEI (James Morse). - Add new blacklist entry for Acer TravelMate 5735Z to the backlight driver (Paul Menzel). - Add i2c address for thermal control to the PMIC driver (Mauro Carvalho Chehab). - Allow the ACPI processor idle driver to work on platforms with only one ACPI C-state present (Zhang Rui). - Fix kobject reference count leaks in error code paths in two places (Qiushi Wu). - Delete unused proc filename macros and make some symbols static (Pascal Terjan, Zheng Zengkai, Zou Wei)" * tag 'acpi-5.8-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (32 commits) ACPI: CPPC: Fix reference count leak in acpi_cppc_processor_probe() ACPI: sysfs: Fix reference count leak in acpi_sysfs_add_hotplug_profile() ACPI: GED: use correct trigger type field in _Exx / _Lxx handling ACPI: DPTF: Add battery participant driver ACPI: DPTF: Additional sysfs attributes for power participant driver ACPI: video: Use native backlight on Acer TravelMate 5735Z arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors mm/memory-failure: Add memory_failure_queue_kick() ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control ACPI: GED: add support for _Exx / _Lxx handler methods ACPI: Delete unused proc filename macros ACPI: hotplug: PCI: Use the new acpi_evaluate_reg() helper ACPI: utils: Add acpi_evaluate_reg() helper ACPI: debug: Make two functions static ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it ACPI: scan: Put SPCR and STAO table after using it ACPI: EC: Put the ACPI table after using it ACPI: APEI: Put the HEST table for error path ACPI: APEI: Put the error record serialization table for error path ...
2020-06-01Merge branches 'acpica' and 'acpi-tables'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+3
* acpica: ACPICA: Update version to 20200430 ACPICA: Fix required parameters for _NIG and _NIH ACPICA: Dispatcher: add status checks ACPICA: Disassembler: ignore AE_ALREADY_EXISTS status when parsing create operators ACPICA: Move acpi_gbl_next_cmd_num definition to acglobal.h ACPICA: Make acpi_protocol_lengths static * acpi-tables: ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using it ACPI: scan: Put SPCR and STAO table after using it ACPI: EC: Put the ACPI table after using it ACPI: APEI: Put the HEST table for error path ACPI: APEI: Put the error record serialization table for error path ACPI: APEI: Put the error injection table for error path and module exit ACPI: APEI: Put the boot error record table after parsing ACPI: watchdog: Put the watchdog action table after parsing ACPI: LPIT: Put the low power idle table after using it
2020-05-25ACPI: PM: s2idle: Print type of wakeup debug messagesRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+15
Since acpi_s2idle_wake() knows the category of wakeup causing the system to resume from suspend-to-idle, make it print a unique message for each of them to help diagnose wakeup issues. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-05-18ACPI: EC: PM: Avoid flushing EC work when EC GPE is inactiveRafael J. Wysocki1-11/+4
Flushing the EC work while suspended to idle when the EC GPE status is not set causes some EC wakeup events (notably power button and lid ones) to be missed after a series of spurious wakeups on the Dell XPS13 9360 in my office. If that happens, the machine cannot be woken up from suspend-to-idle by the power button or lid status change and it needs to be woken up in some other way (eg. by a key press). Flushing the EC work only after successful dispatching the EC GPE, which means that its status has been set, avoids the issue, so change the code in question accordingly. Fixes: 7b301750f7f8 ("ACPI: EC: PM: Avoid premature returns from acpi_s2idle_wake()") Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
2020-05-11ACPI: EC: PM: Avoid premature returns from acpi_s2idle_wake()Rafael J. Wysocki1-12/+2
If the EC GPE status is not set after checking all of the other GPEs, acpi_s2idle_wake() returns 'false', to indicate that the SCI event that has just triggered is not a system wakeup one, but it does that without canceling the pending wakeup and re-arming the SCI for system wakeup which is a mistake, because it may cause s2idle_loop() to busy spin until the next valid wakeup event. [If that happens, the first spurious wakeup is still pending after acpi_s2idle_wake() has returned, so s2idle_enter() does nothing, acpi_s2idle_wake() is called again and it sees that the SCI has triggered, but no GPEs are active, so 'false' is returned again, and so on.] Fix that by moving all of the GPE checking logic from acpi_s2idle_wake() to acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() and making the latter return 'true' only if a non-EC GPE has triggered and 'false' otherwise, which will cause acpi_s2idle_wake() to cancel the pending SCI wakeup and re-arm the SCI for system wakeup regardless of the EC GPE status. This also addresses a lockup observed on an Elitegroup EF20EA laptop after attempting to wake it up from suspend-to-idle by a key press. Fixes: d5406284ff80 ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Refine active GPEs check") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207603 Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com> Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAB4CAwdqo7=MvyG_PE+PGVfeA17AHF5i5JucgaKqqMX6mjArbQ@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com> Tested-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-05-09ACPI: sleep: Put the FACS table after using itHanjun Guo1-1/+3
Put the FACS table after using it to release the table mapping. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-04-04ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()Hans de Goede1-0/+4
Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") the SCI triggering without there being a wakeup cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code will no longer wakeup the system. This works as intended, but this is a problem for devices where the SCI is shared with another device which is also a wakeup source. In the past these, from the pov of the ACPI sleep code, spurious SCIs would still cause a wakeup so the wakeup from the device sharing the interrupt would actually wakeup the system. This now no longer works. This is a problem on e.g. Bay Trail-T and Cherry Trail devices where some peripherals (typically the XHCI controller) can signal a Power Management Event (PME) to the Power Management Controller (PMC) to wakeup the system, this uses the same interrupt as the SCI. These wakeups are handled through a special INT0002 ACPI device which checks for events in the GPE0a_STS for this and takes care of acking the PME so that the shared interrupt stops triggering. The change to the ACPI sleep code to ignore the spurious SCI, causes the system to no longer wakeup on these PME events. To make things worse this means that the INT0002 device driver interrupt handler will no longer run, causing the PME to not get cleared and resulting in the system hanging. Trying to wakeup the system after such a PME through e.g. the power button no longer works. Add an acpi_register_wakeup_handler() function which registers a handler to be called from acpi_s2idle_wake() and when the handler returns true, return true from acpi_s2idle_wake(). The INT0002 driver will use this mechanism to check the GPE0a_STS register from acpi_s2idle_wake() and to tell the system to wakeup if a PME is signaled in the register. Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-03-25ACPI: PM: s2idle: Refine active GPEs checkRafael J. Wysocki1-9/+10
The check for any active GPEs added by commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") turns out to be insufficiently precise to prevent some systems from resuming prematurely due to a spurious EC wakeup, so refine it by first checking if any GPEs other than the EC GPE are active and skipping all of the SCIs coming from the EC that do not produce any genuine wakeup events after processing. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") Reported-by: Ondřej Caletka <ondrej@caletka.cz> Tested-by: Ondřej Caletka <ondrej@caletka.cz> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-03-25ACPICA: Allow acpi_any_gpe_status_set() to skip one GPERafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
The check carried out by acpi_any_gpe_status_set() is not precise enough for the suspend-to-idle implementation in Linux and in some cases it is necessary make it skip one GPE (specifically, the EC GPE) from the check to prevent a race condition leading to a premature system resume from occurring. For this reason, redefine acpi_any_gpe_status_set() to take the number of a GPE to skip as an argument. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Tested-by: Ondřej Caletka <ondrej@caletka.cz> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-03-22ACPI: PM: s2idle: Fix comment in acpi_s2idle_prepare_late()Rafael J. Wysocki1-4/+1
Fix a comment in acpi_s2idle_prepare_late() that has become outdated after commit f0ac20c3f613 ("ACPI: EC: Fix flushing of pending work"). Fixes: f0ac20c3f613 ("ACPI: EC: Fix flushing of pending work") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-02-21ACPI: PM: s2idle: Check fixed wakeup events in acpi_s2idle_wake()Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+7
Commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") overlooked the fact that fixed events can wake up the system too and broke RTC wakeup from suspend-to-idle as a result. Fix this issue by checking the fixed events in acpi_s2idle_wake() in addition to checking wakeup GPEs and break out of the suspend-to-idle loop if the status bits of any enabled fixed events are set then. Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-02-11ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the systemRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+9
If the platform triggers a spurious SCI even though the status bit is not set for any GPE when the system is suspended to idle, it will be treated as a genuine wakeup, so avoid that by checking if any GPEs are active at all before returning 'true' from acpi_s2idle_wake(). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206413 Fixes: 56b991849009 ("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow") Reported-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-02-11ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPERafael J. Wysocki1-13/+31
It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before the subsequent pm_wakeup_pending() check is carried out. If that happens, the resulting wakeup event will cause the system to resume even though it may be a spurious one. To avoid that race, first make the ->wake() callback in struct platform_s2idle_ops return a bool value indicating whether or not to let the system resume and rearrange s2idle_loop() to use that value instad of the direct pm_wakeup_pending() call if ->wake() is present. Next, rework acpi_s2idle_wake() to process EC events and check pm_wakeup_pending() before re-arming the SCI for system wakeup to prevent it from triggering prematurely and add comments to that function to explain the rationale for the new code flow. Fixes: 56b991849009 ("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow") Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-10ACPI/sleep: Convert acpi_wakeup_address into a functionSean Christopherson1-0/+3
Convert acpi_wakeup_address from a raw variable into a function so that x86 can wrap its dereference of the real mode boot header in a function instead of broadcasting it to the world via a #define. This sets the stage for a future patch to move x86's definition of the new function, acpi_get_wakeup_address(), out of asm/acpi.h and thus break acpi.h's dependency on asm/realmode.h. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191126165417.22423-12-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-12-02ACPI: PM: s2idle: Rework ACPI events synchronizationRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+19
Note that the EC GPE processing need not be synchronized in acpi_s2idle_wake() after invoking acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(), because that function checks the GPE status and dispatches its handler if need be and the SCI action handler is not going to run anyway at that point. Moreover, it is better to drain all of the pending ACPI events before restoring the working-state configuration of GPEs in acpi_s2idle_restore(), because those events are likely to be related to system wakeup, in which case they will not be relevant going forward. Rework the code to take these observations into account. Tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-10-10ACPI: PM: Drop Dell XPS13 9360 from LPS0 Idle _DSM blacklistMario Limonciello1-13/+0
This reverts part of commit 71630b7a832f ("ACPI / PM: Blacklist Low Power S0 Idle _DSM for Dell XPS13 9360") to remove the S0ix blacklist for the XPS 9360. The problems with this system occurred in one possible NVME SSD when putting system into s0ix. As the NVME sleep behavior has been adjusted in commit d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend") this is expected to be now resolved. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196907 Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com> Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-21ACPI: PM: s2idle: Always set up EC GPE for system wakeupRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+13
Commit 10a08fd65ec1 ("ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need it") assumed that the EC GPE would only need to be set up for system wakeup if either the intel-hid or the intel-vbtn driver was in use, but that turns out to be incorrect. In particular, on ASUS Zenbook UX430UNR/i7-8550U, if the EC GPE is not enabled while suspended, the system cannot be woken up by opening the lid or pressing a key, and that machine doesn't use any of the drivers mentioned above. For this reason, always set up the EC GPE for system wakeup from suspend-to-idle by setting and clearing its wake mask in the ACPI suspend-to-idle callbacks. Fixes: 10a08fd65ec1 ("ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need it") Reported-by: Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> Tested-by: Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-21ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid rearming SCI for wakeup unnecessarilyRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+2
It is only necessary to rearm the ACPI SCI for wakeup if pm_system_cancel_wakeup() has been called, so invoke rearm_wake_irq() only in that case. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-08ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-12/+24
According to Section 3.5 of the "Intel Low Power S0 Idle" document [1], Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is expected to be invoked when the system configuration matches the criteria for entering the target low-power state of the platform. In particular, this means that all devices should be suspended and in low-power states already when that function is invoked. This is not the case currently, however, because Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is invoked by it before the "noirq" phase of device suspend, which means that some devices may not have been put into low-power states yet at that point. That is a consequence of the previous design of the suspend-to-idle flow that allowed the "noirq" phase of device suspend and the "noirq" phase of device resume to be carried out for multiple times while "suspended" (if any spurious wakeup events were detected) and the point of the LPS0 _DSM Function 5 invocation was chosen so as to call it (and LPS0 _DSM Function 6 analogously) once per suspend-resume cycle (regardless of how many times the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume were carried out while "suspended"). Now that the suspend-to-idle flow has been redesigned to carry out the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume once in each cycle, the code can be reordered to follow the specification that it is based on more closely. For this purpose, add ->prepare_late and ->restore_early platform callbacks for suspend-to-idle, to be executed, respectively, after the "noirq" phase of suspending devices and before the "noirq" phase of resuming them and make ACPI use them for the invocation of LPS0 _DSM functions as appropriate. While at it, move the LPS0 entry requirements check to be made before invoking Functions 3 and 5 of the LPS0 _DSM (also once per cycle) as follows from the specification [1]. Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf # [1] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
2019-08-08ACPI: PM: s2idle: Eliminate acpi_sleep_no_ec_events()Rafael J. Wysocki1-9/+0
Change acpi_ec_suspend() to use pm_suspend_no_platform() instead of acpi_sleep_no_ec_events(), which allows the latter to be eliminated along with the s2idle_in_progress variable which is only used by it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
2019-08-08ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add acpi.sleep_no_lps0 module parameterRafael J. Wysocki1-16/+15
Add a module parameter to prevent the ACPI LPS0 _DSM functions from being invoked (if need be) and rework the suspend-to-idle blacklist entries in acpisleep_dmi_table[] to make them simply prevent suspend-to-idle from being used by default on the systems in question (which really is the original purpose of those entries). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
2019-08-08ACPI: PM: s2idle: Rearrange lps0_device_attach()Rafael J. Wysocki1-15/+17
To allow a subsequent change to be simpler, rearrange the code in lps0_device_attach() to reduce the indentation level and (while at it) make it avoid calling lpi_device_get_constraints() when lps0_device_handle is not going to be set. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
2019-07-30ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need itRafael J. Wysocki1-11/+2
The EC GPE needs to be set up for system wakeup only if there is a driver depending on it, either intel-hid or intel-vbtn, bound to a button device that is expected to wake up the system from sleep (such as the power button on some Dell systems, like the XPS13 9360). It doesn't need to be set up for waking up the system from sleep in any other cases and whether or not it is expected to wake up the system from sleep doesn't depend on whether or not the LPS0 device is present in the ACPI namespace. For this reason, rearrange the ACPI suspend-to-idle code to make the drivers depending on the EC GPE wakeup take care of setting it up and decouple that from the LPS0 device handling. While at it, make intel-hid and intel-vbtn prepare for system wakeup only if they are allowed to wake up the system from sleep by user space (via sysfs). [Note that acpi_ec_mark_gpe_for_wake() and acpi_ec_set_gpe_wake_mask() are there to prevent the EC GPE from being disabled by the acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() call in acpi_s2idle_prepare(), so on systems with either intel-hid or intel-vbtn this change doesn't affect any interactions with the hardware or platform firmware.] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
2019-07-23PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flowRafael J. Wysocki1-22/+25
After commit 33e4f80ee69b ("ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle") the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume may run for multiple times during suspend-to-idle, if there are spurious system wakeup events while suspended. However, this is complicated and fragile and actually unnecessary. The main reason for doing this is that on some systems the EC may signal system wakeup events (power button events, for example) as well as events that should not cause the system to resume (spurious system wakeup events). Thus, in order to determine whether or not a given event signaled by the EC while suspended is a proper system wakeup one, the EC GPE needs to be dispatched and to start with that was achieved by allowing the ACPI SCI action handler to run, which was only possible after calling resume_device_irqs(). However, dispatching the EC GPE this way turned out to take too much time in some cases and some EC events might be missed due to that, so commit 68e22011856f ("ACPI: EC: Dispatch the EC GPE directly on s2idle wake") started to dispatch the EC GPE right after a wakeup event has been detected, so in fact the full ACPI SCI action handler doesn't need to run any more to deal with the wakeups coming from the EC. Use this observation to simplify the suspend-to-idle control flow so that the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume are each run only once in every suspend-to-idle cycle, which is reported to significantly reduce power drawn by some systems when suspended to idle (by allowing them to reach a deep platform-wide low-power state through the suspend-to-idle flow). [What appears to happen is that the "noirq" resume of devices after a spurious EC wakeup brings some devices into a state in which they prevent the platform from reaching the deep low-power state going forward, even after a subsequent "noirq" suspend phase, and on some systems the EC triggers such wakeups already when the "noirq" suspend of devices is running for the first time in the given suspend/resume cycle, so the platform cannot reach the deep low-power state at all.] First, make acpi_s2idle_wake() use the acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() return value to determine whether or not the wakeup may have been triggered by the EC (in which case the system wakeup is canceled and ACPI events are processed in order to determine whether or not the event is a proper system wakeup one) and use rearm_wake_irq() (introduced by a previous change) in it to rearm the ACPI SCI for system wakeup detection in case the system will remain suspended. Second, drop acpi_s2idle_sync(), which is not needed any more, and the corresponding global platform suspend-to-idle callback. Next, drop the pm_wakeup_pending() check (which is an optimization only) from __device_suspend_noirq() to prevent it from returning errors on system wakeups occurring before the "noirq" phase of device suspend is complete (as in the case of suspend-to-idle it is not known whether or not these wakeups are suprious at that point), in order to avoid having to carry out a "noirq" resume of devices on a spurious system wakeup. Finally, change the code flow in s2idle_loop() to (1) run the "noirq" suspend of devices once before starting the loop, (2) check for spurious EC wakeups (via the platform ->wake callback) for the first time before calling s2idle_enter(), and (3) run the "noirq" resume of devices once after leaving the loop. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2019-07-23ACPI: PM: Set s2idle_wakeup earlier and clear it laterRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+4
The role of the s2idle_wakeup variable is to cause acpi_pm_wakeup_event() and acpi_pm_notify_handler() to increment pm_abort_suspend and trigger a wakeup from suspend-to-idle in case the ACPI SCI wakeup was canceled by acpi_s2idle_wake(). However, for this purpose it need not be set in acpi_s2idle_wake() and cleared in acpi_s2idle_sync(), respectively. In fact, it may be set as early as in acpi_s2idle_prepare() and cleared as late as in acpi_s2idle_restore(), so do that to allow subsequent changes to be simpler. This change is not expected to alter functionality. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2019-07-08Merge branches 'acpi-pm' and 'pm-pci'Rafael J. Wysocki1-15/+7
* acpi-pm: ACPI: PM: Make acpi_sleep_state_supported() non-static ACPI: PM: Allow transitions to D0 to occur in special cases ACPI: PM: Avoid evaluating _PS3 on transitions from D3hot to D3cold ACPI / sleep: Switch to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev() ACPI / LPIT: Correct LPIT end address for lpit_process() * pm-pci: ACPI: PM: Unexport acpi_device_get_power() PCI: PM/ACPI: Refresh all stale power state data in pci_pm_complete() PCI / ACPI: Add _PR0 dependent devices ACPI / PM: Introduce concept of a _PR0 dependent device PCI / ACPI: Use cached ACPI device state to get PCI device power state PCI: Do not poll for PME if the device is in D3cold PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec PCI: PM: Replace pci_dev_keep_suspended() with two functions PCI: PM: Avoid resuming devices in D3hot during system suspend
2019-07-06ACPI: PM: Make acpi_sleep_state_supported() non-staticDexuan Cui1-1/+1
With some upcoming patches to save/restore the Hyper-V drivers related states, a Linux VM running on Hyper-V will be able to hibernate. When a Linux VM hibernates, unluckily we must disable the memory hot-add/remove and balloon up/down capabilities in the hv_balloon driver (drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c), because these can not really work according to the design of the related back-end driver on the host. By default, Hyper-V does not enable the virtual ACPI S4 state for a VM; on recent Hyper-V hosts, the administrator is able to enable the virtual ACPI S4 state for a VM, so we hope to use the presence of the virtual ACPI S4 state as a hint for hv_balloon to disable the aforementioned capabilities. In this way, hibernation will work more reliably, from the user's perspective. By marking acpi_sleep_state_supported() non-static, we'll be able to implement a hv_is_hibernation_supported() API in the always-built-in module arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c, and the API will be called by hv_balloon. Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-13ACPI / sleep: Switch to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev()Andy Shevchenko1-14/+6
Switch the acpi_pm_finish() to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev() instead of custom approach. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 428Thomas Gleixner1-3/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this file is released under the gplv2 extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 68 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190114.292346262@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-27ACPI: PM: Call pm_set_suspend_via_firmware() during hibernationRafael J. Wysocki1-15/+24
On systems with ACPI platform firmware the last stage of hibernation is analogous to system suspend to S3 (suspend-to-RAM), so it should be handled analogously. In particular, pm_suspend_via_firmware() should return 'true' in that stage to let the callers of it know that control will be passed to the platform firmware going forward, so pm_set_suspend_via_firmware() needs to be called then in analogy with acpi_suspend_begin(). However, the platform hibernation ->begin() callback is invoked during the "freeze" transition (before creating a snapshot image of system memory) as well as during the "hibernate" transition which is the last stage of it and pm_set_suspend_via_firmware() should be invoked by that callback in the latter stage only. In order to implement that redefine the hibernation ->begin() callback to take a pm_message_t argument to indicate which stage of hibernation is taking place and rework acpi_hibernation_begin() and acpi_hibernation_begin_old() to take it into account as needed. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-05-14ACPI: PM: Set enable_for_wake for wakeup GPEs during suspend-to-idleRajat Jain1-0/+4
I noticed that recently multiple systems (chromebooks) couldn't wake from S0ix using LID or Keyboard after updating to a newer kernel. I bisected and it turned up commit f941d3e41da7 ("ACPI: EC / PM: Disable non-wakeup GPEs for suspend-to-idle"). I checked that the issue got fixed if that commit was reverted. I debugged and found that although PNP0C0D:00 (representing the LID) is wake capable and should wakeup the system per the code in acpi_wakeup_gpe_init() and in drivers/acpi/button.c: localhost /sys # cat /proc/acpi/wakeup Device S-state Status Sysfs node LID0 S4 *enabled platform:PNP0C0D:00 CREC S5 *disabled platform:GOOG0004:00 *disabled platform:cros-ec-dev.1.auto *disabled platform:cros-ec-accel.0 *disabled platform:cros-ec-accel.1 *disabled platform:cros-ec-gyro.0 *disabled platform:cros-ec-ring.0 *disabled platform:cros-usbpd-charger.2.auto *disabled platform:cros-usbpd-logger.3.auto D015 S3 *enabled i2c:i2c-ELAN0000:00 PENH S3 *enabled platform:PRP0001:00 XHCI S3 *enabled pci:0000:00:14.0 GLAN S4 *disabled WIFI S3 *disabled pci:0000:00:14.3 localhost /sys # On debugging, I found that its corresponding GPE is not being enabled. The particular GPE's "gpe_register_info->enable_for_wake" does not have any bits set when acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() comes around to use it. I looked at code and could not find any other code path that should set the bits in "enable_for_wake" bitmask for the wake enabled devices for s2idle. [I do see that it happens for S3 in acpi_sleep_prepare()]. Thus I used the same call to enable the GPEs for wake enabled devices, and verified that this fixes the regression I was seeing on multiple of my devices. [ rjw: The problem is that commit f941d3e41da7 ("ACPI: EC / PM: Disable non-wakeup GPEs for suspend-to-idle") forgot to add the acpi_enable_wakeup_devices() call for s2idle along with acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(). ] Fixes: f941d3e41da7 ("ACPI: EC / PM: Disable non-wakeup GPEs for suspend-to-idle") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203579 Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Cc: 5.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-12-18ACPI: PM: Loop in full LPS0 mode onlyRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+3
After a previous change, all non-wakeup GPEs are disabled for suspend-to-idle unless full Low-Power S0 (LPS0) mode is in use, so it is not necessary to do anything in acpi_s2idle_wake() unless in full LPS0 mode, which is only when lps0_device_handle is set. Modify the code accordingly. Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-12-18ACPI: EC / PM: Disable non-wakeup GPEs for suspend-to-idleRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+11
There are systems in which non-wakeup GPEs fire during the "noirq" suspend stage of suspending devices and that effectively prevents the system that tries to suspend to idle from entering any low-power state at all. If the offending GPE fires regularly and often enough, the system appears to be suspended, but in fact it is in a tight loop over "noirq" suspend and "noirq" resume of devices all the time. To prevent that from happening, disable all non-wakeup GPEs except for the EC GPE for suspend-to-idle (the EC GPE is special, because on some systems it has to be enabled for power button wakeup events to be generated as expected). Fixes: 147a7d9d25ca (ACPI / PM: Do not reconfigure GPEs for suspend-to-idle) Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201987 Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-11ACPI / PM: save NVS memory for ASUS 1025C laptopWilly Tarreau1-0/+8
Every time I tried to upgrade my laptop from 3.10.x to 4.x I faced an issue by which the fan would run at full speed upon resume. Bisecting it showed me the issue was introduced in 3.17 by commit 821d6f0359b0 (ACPI / sleep: Do not save NVS for new machines to accelerate S3). This code only affects machines built starting as of 2012, but this Asus 1025C laptop was made in 2012 and apparently needs the NVS data to be saved, otherwise the CPU's thermal state is not properly reported on resume and the fan runs at full speed upon resume. Here's a very simple way to check if such a machine is affected : # cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp 55000 ( now suspend, wait one second and resume ) # cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp 0 (and after ~15 seconds the fan starts to spin) Let's apply the same quirk as commit cbc00c13 (ACPI: save NVS memory for Lenovo G50-45) and reuse the function it provides. Note that this commit was already backported to 4.9.x but not 4.4.x. Cc: 3.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17+: requires cbc00c13 Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-04ACPI / PM: Default to s2idle in all machines supporting LP S0Tristian Celestin1-14/+8
The Dell Venue Pro 7140 supports the Low Power S0 Idle state, but does not support any of the _DSM functions that the current heuristic checks for. Since suspend-to-mem can not be safely performed on this machine, and since the bitfield check can't cover this case, it is safer to enable s2idle by default by checking for the presence of the _DSM alone and removing the bitfield check. Signed-off-by: Tristian Celestin <tristiancelestin@fastmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-25ACPI: EC: Dispatch the EC GPE directly on s2idle wakeRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+7
On platforms where the Low Power S0 Idle _DSM interface is used, on wakeup from suspend-to-idle, when it is known that the ACPI SCI has triggered while suspended, dispatch the EC GPE in order to catch all EC events that may have triggered the wakeup before carrying out the noirq phase of device resume. That is needed to handle power button wakeup on some platforms where the EC goes into a low-power mode during suspend-to-idle and while in that mode it will discard events after a timeout. If that timeout is shorter than the time it takes to complete the noirq resume of devices, looking for EC events after the latter is too late. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
2018-04-23ACPI / PM: Blacklist Low Power S0 Idle _DSM for ThinkPad X1 Tablet(2016)Chen Yu1-0/+13
ThinkPad X1 Tablet(2016) is reported to have issues with the Low Power S0 Idle _DSM interface and since this machine model generally can do ACPI S3 just fine, and user would like to use S3 as default sleep model, add a blacklist entry to disable that interface for ThinkPad X1 Tablet(2016). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199057 Reported-and-tested-by: Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-03Merge tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-15/+9
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These update the cpuidle poll state definition to reduce excessive energy usage related to it, add new CPU ID to the RAPL power capping driver, update the ACPI system suspend code to handle some special cases better, extend the PM core's device links code slightly, add new sysfs attribute for better suspend-to-idle diagnostics and easier hibernation handling, update power management tools and clean up cpufreq quite a bit. Specifics: - Modify the cpuidle poll state implementation to prevent CPUs from staying in the loop in there for excessive times (Rafael Wysocki). - Add Intel Cannon Lake chips support to the RAPL power capping driver (Joe Konno). - Add reference counting to the device links handling code in the PM core (Lukas Wunner). - Avoid reconfiguring GPEs on suspend-to-idle in the ACPI system suspend code (Rafael Wysocki). - Allow devices to be put into deeper low-power states via ACPI if both _SxD and _SxW are missing (Daniel Drake). - Reorganize the core ACPI suspend-to-idle wakeup code to avoid a keyboard wakeup issue on Asus UX331UA (Chris Chiu). - Prevent the PCMCIA library code from aborting suspend-to-idle due to noirq suspend failures resulting from incorrect assumptions (Rafael Wysocki). - Add coupled cpuidle supprt to the Exynos3250 platform (Marek Szyprowski). - Add new sysfs file to make it easier to specify the image storage location during hibernation (Mario Limonciello). - Add sysfs files for collecting suspend-to-idle usage and time statistics for CPU idle states (Rafael Wysocki). - Update the pm-graph utilities (Todd Brandt). - Reduce the kernel log noise related to reporting Low-power Idle constraings by the ACPI system suspend code (Rafael Wysocki). - Make it easier to distinguish dedicated wakeup IRQs in the /proc/interrupts output (Tony Lindgren). - Add the frequency table validation in cpufreq to the core and drop it from a number of cpufreq drivers (Viresh Kumar). - Drop "cooling-{min|max}-level" for CPU nodes from a couple of DT bindings (Viresh Kumar). - Clean up the CPU online error code path in the cpufreq core (Viresh Kumar). - Fix assorted issues in the SCPI, CPPC, mediatek and tegra186 cpufreq drivers (Arnd Bergmann, Chunyu Hu, George Cherian, Viresh Kumar). - Drop memory allocation error messages from a few places in cpufreq and cpuildle drivers (Markus Elfring)" * tag 'pm-4.17-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (56 commits) ACPI / PM: Fix keyboard wakeup from suspend-to-idle on ASUS UX331UA cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency PM / hibernate: Change message when writing to /sys/power/resume PM / hibernate: Make passing hibernate offsets more friendly cpuidle: poll_state: Avoid invoking local_clock() too often PM: cpuidle/suspend: Add s2idle usage and time state attributes cpuidle: Enable coupled cpuidle support on Exynos3250 platform cpuidle: poll_state: Add time limit to poll_idle() cpufreq: tegra186: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: speedstep: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: sparc: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: sh: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: sfi: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: scpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: sc520: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: s3c24xx: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: qoirq: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: pxa: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Don't validate the frequency table twice cpufreq: powernow: Don't validate the frequency table twice ...
2018-03-31ACPI / PM: Fix keyboard wakeup from suspend-to-idle on ASUS UX331UAChris Chiu1-1/+2
This issue happens on new ASUS laptop UX331UA which has modern standby mode (suspend-to-idle). Pressing keys on the PS2 keyboard can't wake up the system from suspend-to-idle which is not expected. However, pressing power button can wake up without problem. Per the engineers of ASUS, the keypress event is routed to Embedded Controller (EC) in standby mode. EC then signals the SCI event to BIOS so BIOS would Notify() power button to wake up the system. It's from BIOS perspective. What we observe here is that kernel receives the SCI event from SCI interrupt handler which informs that the GPE status bit belongs to EC needs to be handled and then queries the EC to find out what event is pending. Then execute the following ACPI _QDF method which defined in ACPI DSDT for EC to notify power button. Method (_QDF, 0, NotSerialized) // _Qxx: EC Query { Notify (PWRB, 0x80) // Status Change } With more debug messages added to analyze this problem, we find that the keypress does wake up the system from suspend-to-idle but it's back to suspend again almost immediately. As we see in the following messages, the acpi_button_notify() is invoked but acpi_pm_wakeup_event() can not really wake up the system here because acpi_s2idle_wakeup() is false. The acpi_s2idle_wakeup() returnd false because the acpi_s2idle_sync() has alrealdy exited. [ 52.987048] s2idle_loop going s2idle [ 59.713392] acpi_s2idle_wake enter [ 59.713394] acpi_s2idle_wake exit [ 59.760888] acpi_ev_gpe_detect enter [ 59.760893] acpi_s2idle_sync enter [ 59.760893] acpi_ec_query_flushed ec pending queries 0 [ 59.760953] Read registers for GPE 50-57: Status=01, Enable=01, RunEnable=01, WakeEnable=00 [ 59.760955] ACPI: EC: ===== IRQ (1) ===== [ 59.760972] ACPI: EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x28 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=1 IBF=0 OBF=0 [ 59.760979] ACPI: EC: +++++ Polling enabled +++++ [ 59.760979] ACPI: EC: ##### Command(QR_EC) submitted/blocked ##### [ 59.761003] acpi_s2idle_sync exit [ 59.769587] ACPI: EC: ##### Query(0xdf) started ##### [ 59.769611] ACPI: EC: ##### Query(0xdf) stopped ##### [ 59.774154] acpi_button_notify button type 1 [ 59.813175] s2idle_loop going s2idle acpi_s2idle_sync() already makes an effort to flush the EC event queue, but in this case, the EC event has yet to be generated when the call to acpi_ec_flush_work() is made. The event is generated shortly after, through the ongoing handling of the SCI interrupt which is happening on another CPU, and we must synchronize that to make sure that it has run and completed. Adding another call to acpi_os_wait_events_complete() solves this issue, since that function synchronizes with SCI interrupt completion. Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-18ACPI / PM: Reduce LPI constraints logging noiseRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+6
If a device referred to by ACPI LPI constrains (coming from function 1 of the Low Power S0 Idle _DSM interface) is not power-manageable via ACPI (no _PS0 method and no power resources), the code generating diagnostic information for the LPI constraints will print a message about that to the kernel log on every system suspend-resume cycle (possibly for multiple times). That is not very useful and noisy, so modify that code to disregard the LPI list entries corresponding to the devices that are not power- manageable after printing that information for them once. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>