summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/scan.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-02-25Merge tag 'pm+acpi-fixes-3.9-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+8
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull ACPI and power management fixes from Rafael Wysocki: - Fixes for blackfin and microblaze build problems introduced by the removal of global pm_idle. From Lars-Peter Clausen. - OPP core build fix from Shawn Guo. - Error condition check fix for the new imx6q-cpufreq driver from Wei Yongjun. - Fix for an AER driver crash related to the lack of APEI initialization for acpi=off. From Rafael J Wysocki. - Fix for a USB breakage on Thinkpad T430 related to ACPI power resources and PCI wakeup from Rafael J. Wysocki. * tag 'pm+acpi-fixes-3.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account imx6q-cpufreq: fix return value check in imx6q_cpufreq_probe() PM / OPP: fix condition for empty of_init_opp_table() ACPI / APEI: Fix crash in apei_hest_parse() for acpi=off microblaze idle: Fix compile error blackfin idle: Fix compile error
2013-02-25Merge tag 'pci-v3.9-changes' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci Pull PCI changes from Bjorn Helgaas: "Host bridge hotplug - Major overhaul of ACPI host bridge add/start (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu) - Major overhaul of PCI/ACPI binding (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu) - Split out ACPI host bridge and ACPI PCI device hotplug (Yinghai Lu) - Stop caching _PRT and make independent of bus numbers (Yinghai Lu) PCI device hotplug - Clean up cpqphp dead code (Sasha Levin) - Disable ARI unless device and upstream bridge support it (Yijing Wang) - Initialize all hot-added devices (not functions 0-7) (Yijing Wang) Power management - Don't touch ASPM if disabled (Joe Lawrence) - Fix ASPM link state management (Myron Stowe) Miscellaneous - Fix PCI_EXP_FLAGS accessor (Alex Williamson) - Disable Bus Master in pci_device_shutdown (Konstantin Khlebnikov) - Document hotplug resource and MPS parameters (Yijing Wang) - Add accessor for PCIe capabilities (Myron Stowe) - Drop pciehp suspend/resume messages (Paul Bolle) - Make pci_slot built-in only (not a module) (Jiang Liu) - Remove unused PCI/ACPI bind ops (Jiang Liu) - Removed used pci_root_bus (Bjorn Helgaas)" * tag 'pci-v3.9-changes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci: (51 commits) PCI/ACPI: Don't cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers PCI: Fix PCI Express Capability accessors for PCI_EXP_FLAGS ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module PCI/PM: Clear state_saved during suspend PCI: Use atomic_inc_return() rather than atomic_add_return() PCI: Catch attempts to disable already-disabled devices PCI: Disable Bus Master unconditionally in pci_device_shutdown() PCI: acpiphp: Remove dead code for PCI host bridge hotplug PCI: acpiphp: Create companion ACPI devices before creating PCI devices PCI: Remove unused "rc" in virtfn_add_bus() PCI: pciehp: Drop suspend/resume ENTRY messages PCI/ASPM: Don't touch ASPM if forcibly disabled PCI/ASPM: Deallocate upstream link state even if device is not PCIe PCI: Document MPS parameters pci=pcie_bus_safe, pci=pcie_bus_perf, etc PCI: Document hpiosize= and hpmemsize= resource reservation parameters PCI: Use PCI Express Capability accessor PCI: Introduce accessor to retrieve PCIe Capabilities Register PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible PCI: Skip attaching driver in device_add() PCI: acpiphp: Keep driver loaded even if no slots found ...
2013-02-23Merge branch 'acpi-pm' into fixesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+8
* acpi-pm: ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account
2013-02-23ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into accountRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+8
Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-15Merge branch 'pci/jiang-pci_slot-kconfig' into nextBjorn Helgaas1-0/+1
* pci/jiang-pci_slot-kconfig: ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module
2013-02-15ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a moduleJiang Liu1-0/+1
As discussed in thread at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/, there's no value in supporting CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m any more. So change Kconfig and code to only support building pci_slot as built-in driver. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2013-02-15Merge branch 'acpi-cleanup'Rafael J. Wysocki1-95/+162
* acpi-cleanup: (21 commits) ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks ACPI: Remove the use of CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER_MODULE ACPI / scan: Full transition to D3cold in acpi_device_unregister() ACPI / scan: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() acquire the scan lock ACPI: Drop the container.h header file ACPI / Documentation: refer to correct file for acpi_platform_device_ids[] table ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler ACPI / scan: Remove useless #ifndef from acpi_eject_store() ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failed ACPI: sysfs eject support for ACPI scan handlers ACPI / scan: Follow priorities of IDs when matching scan handlers ACPI / PCI: pci_slot: replace printk(KERN_xxx) with pr_xxx() ACPI / dock: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/acpi/dock.c ACPI / scan: Clean up acpi_bus_get_parent() ACPI / platform: Use struct acpi_scan_handler for creating devices ACPI / PCI: Make PCI IRQ link driver use struct acpi_scan_handler ACPI / PCI: Make PCI root driver use struct acpi_scan_handler ACPI / scan: Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler ACPI / scan: Make scanning of fixed devices follow the general scheme ACPI: Drop device start operation that is not used ...
2013-02-13ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaksRafael J. Wysocki1-21/+48
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13ACPI / scan: Full transition to D3cold in acpi_device_unregister()Rafael J. Wysocki1-9/+4
In order to drop reference counts of all power resources used by an ACPI device node being removed, acpi_device_unregister() calls acpi_power_transition(device, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD), which effectively transitions the device node into D3cold if it uses any power resources. However, for some device nodes it may not be appropriate to remove power from them entirely before putting them into D3hot before. On the other hand, executing _PS3 for devices that don't use power resources before removing them shouldn't really hurt. In fact, that is done by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), but this is not the right place to do it, because the bus trimming may have caused power to be removed from the device node in question already before. For these reasons, make acpi_device_unregister() carry out full power-off transition for all device nodes supporting that and remove the direct evaluation of _PS3 from acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-13ACPI / scan: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() acquire the scan lockRafael J. Wysocki1-14/+17
The ACPI scan lock has been introduced to prevent acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() from running in parallel with each other for overlapping ACPI namespace scopes. However, it is not sufficient to do that, because if acpi_bus_scan() is run (for an overlapping namespace scope) right after the acpi_bus_trim() in acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), the subsequent eject will remove devices without removing the corresponding struct acpi_device objects (and possibly companion "physical" device objects). Therefore acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() has to acquire the scan lock before carrying out the bus trimming and hold it through the evaluation of _EJ0, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-13ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handlerRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more straightforward. This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-13ACPI / scan: Remove useless #ifndef from acpi_eject_store()Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+0
Since the FORCE_EJECT symbol is never defined, the #ifndef FORCE_EJECT in acpi_eject_store() is always true, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-13ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failedToshi Kani1-0/+2
When acpi_device_install_notify_handler() failed in acpi_device_probe(), it calls acpi_drv->ops.remove() and fails the probe. However, the ACPI driver is left bound to the acpi_device. Fix it by clearing the driver and driver_data fields. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-13ACPI: sysfs eject support for ACPI scan handlersToshi Kani1-1/+1
Changed sysfs eject, acpi_eject_store(), so that it doesn't return error codes for devices nodes with ACPI scan handlers attached and no ACPI drivers. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-13ACPI / scan: Follow priorities of IDs when matching scan handlersRafael J. Wysocki1-12/+28
The IDs of ACPI device nodes stored in their pnp.ids member arrays are sorted by decreasing priority (i.e. the highest-priority ID is the first entry). This means that when matching scan handlers to device nodes, the namespace scanning code should walk the list of scan handlers for each device node ID instead of walking the list of device node IDs for each handler (the latter causes the first handler matching any of the device node IDs to be chosen, although there may be another handler matching an ID of a higher priority which should be preferred). Make the code follow this observation. This change has been suggested and justified by Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-11Merge branch 'acpi-lpss'Rafael J. Wysocki1-10/+13
* acpi-lpss: ACPI / platform: create LPSS clocks if Lynxpoint devices are found during scan clk: x86: add support for Lynxpoint LPSS clocks x86: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem ACPI / platform: fix comment about the platform device name ACPI: add support for CSRT table
2013-02-11Merge branch 'acpi-pm'Rafael J. Wysocki1-217/+245
* acpi-pm: (35 commits) ACPI / PM: Handle missing _PSC in acpi_bus_update_power() ACPI / PM: Do not power manage devices in unknown initial states ACPI / PM: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/acpi/device_pm.c ACPI / PM: Fix /proc/acpi/wakeup for devices w/o bus or parent ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space sysfs: Functions for adding/removing symlinks to/from attribute groups ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resources ACPI / PM: Expose power states of ACPI devices to user space ACPI / scan: Prevent device add uevents from racing with user space ACPI / PM: Fix device power state value after transitions to D3cold ACPI / PM: Use string "D3cold" to represent ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD ACPI / PM: Sanitize checks in acpi_power_on_resources() ACPI / PM: Always evaluate _PSn after setting power resources ACPI / PM: Introduce helper for executing _PSn methods ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_init_power() more robust ACPI / PM: Fix build for unusual combination of Kconfig options ACPI / PM: remove leading whitespace from #ifdef ACPI / PM: Consolidate suspend-specific and hibernate-specific code ACPI / PM: Move device power management functions to device_pm.c ...
2013-02-11Merge branch 'acpi-scan'Rafael J. Wysocki1-218/+122
* acpi-scan: (30 commits) ACPI / scan: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_match_device() ACPI / scan: Make namespace scanning and trimming mutually exclusive ACPI / scan: Make it clear that acpi_bus_trim() cannot fail ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister() ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value. ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag ...
2013-02-01ACPI / PM: Do not power manage devices in unknown initial statesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+4
In general, for ACPI device power management to work, the initial power states of devices must be known (otherwise, we wouldn't be able to keep track of power resources, for example). Hence, if it is impossible to determine the initial ACPI power states of some devices, they can't be regarded as power-manageable using ACPI. For this reason, modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to clear the power_manageable flag if acpi_bus_init_power() fails and add some extra fallback code to acpi_bus_init_power() to cover broken BIOSes that provide _PS0/_PS3 without _PSC for some devices. Verified to work on my HP nx6325 that has this problem. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
2013-01-31ACPI / scan: Clean up acpi_bus_get_parent()Rafael J. Wysocki1-11/+5
Make acpi_bus_get_parent() more straightforward and remove an unnecessary local variable ret from it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-01-31ACPI / scan: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_match_device()Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+2
Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns int and not acpi_status, change acpi_match_device() so that it doesn't apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of acpi_bus_get_device(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-01-30ACPI / platform: Use struct acpi_scan_handler for creating devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-29/+1
Currently, the ACPI namespace scanning code creates platform device objects for ACPI device nodes whose IDs match the contents of the acpi_platform_device_ids[] table. However, this adds a superfluous special case into acpi_bus_device_attach() and makes it more difficult to follow than it has to be. It also will make it more difficult to implement removal code for those platform device objects in the future. For the above reasons, introduce a struct acpi_scan_handler object for creating platform devices and move the code related to that from acpi_bus_device_attach() to the .attach() callback of that object. Also move the acpi_platform_device_ids[] table to acpi_platform.c. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-01-30ACPI / PCI: Make PCI IRQ link driver use struct acpi_scan_handlerRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Make the ACPI PCI IRQ link driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to set up ACPI interrupt links and to remove data structures used for this purpose before unregistering the corresponding ACPI device nodes. This simplifies the code slightly and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-30ACPI / scan: Introduce struct acpi_scan_handlerRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+53
Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler for representing objects that will do configuration tasks depending on ACPI device nodes' hardware IDs (HIDs). Currently, those tasks are done either directly by the ACPI namespace scanning code or by ACPI device drivers designed specifically for this purpose. None of the above is desirable, however, because doing that directly in the namespace scanning code makes that code overly complicated and difficult to follow and doing that in "special" device drivers leads to a great deal of confusion about their role and to confusing interactions with the driver core (for example, sysfs directories are created for those drivers, but they are completely unnecessary and only increase the kernel's memory footprint in vain). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-29Merge branch 'acpi-lpss' into acpi-cleanupRafael J. Wysocki1-10/+13
The following commits depend on the 'acpi-lpss' material.
2013-01-29Merge branch 'acpi-scan' into acpi-cleanupRafael J. Wysocki1-13/+15
The following commits depend on the 'acpi-scan' material.
2013-01-29ACPI / scan: Make scanning of fixed devices follow the general schemeRafael J. Wysocki1-11/+24
Make acpi_bus_scan_fixed() use device_attach() directly to attach drivers, if any, to the fixed devices in analogy with how acpi_bus_scan() works, which allows the last argument of acpi_add_single_object() to be dropped and the manipulation of the flags.match_driver bit to be moved to acpi_init_device_object() and acpi_device_add_finalize(). After these changes all of the functions for the initialization and registration of struct acpi_device objects work in the same way for all of them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-29Merge branch 'acpi-pm' into acpi-cleanupRafael J. Wysocki1-216/+241
The following commits depend on the 'acpi-pm' material.
2013-01-27ACPI / scan: Make namespace scanning and trimming mutually exclusiveRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+12
There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace, which may lead to a great deal of confusion, so introduce a new mutex to prevent that from happening. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-26ACPI: Remove useless type argument of driver .remove() operationRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+2
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-26Merge branch 'acpi-scan' into acpi-cleanupRafael J. Wysocki1-212/+114
The following commits depend on the 'acpi-scan' material.
2013-01-26ACPI / scan: Make it clear that acpi_bus_trim() cannot failRafael J. Wysocki1-9/+3
Since acpi_bus_trim() cannot fail, change its definition to a void function, so that its callers don't check the return value in vain and update the callers. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-25PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to pci_root.cYinghai Lu1-0/+3
The acpiphp driver is confusing because it contains partial support for PCI host bridge hotplug as well as support for hotplug of PCI devices. This patch moves the host bridge hot-add support to pci_root.c and adds hot-remove support in pci_root.c. How to test it: if sci_emu patch is applied, find out root bus number to ACPI root name mapping from dmesg or /sys. To remove root bus: echo "\_SB.PCIB 3" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify To add back root bus: echo "\_SB.PCIB 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-24ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+3
Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-01-24ACPI / PM: Expose power states of ACPI devices to user spaceRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+48
Make it possible to retrieve the current power state of a device with ACPI power management from user space via sysfs by adding two new attributes, power_state and real_power_state, to the sysfs directory associated with the struct acpi_device object representing the device's ACPI node. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-01-24ACPI / scan: Prevent device add uevents from racing with user spaceRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+15
ACPI core adds sysfs device files after the given devices have been registered with device_register(), which is not appropriate, because it may lead to race conditions with user space tools using those files. Fix the problem by delaying the KOBJ_ADD uevent for ACPI devices until after all of the devices' sysfs files have been created. This also fixes a use-after-free in acpi_device_unregister(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-01-23ACPI / platform: create LPSS clocks if Lynxpoint devices are found during scanMika Westerberg1-10/+12
Intel Lynxpoint LPSS peripheral drivers depend on LPSS clock tree being created in order to function properly. The clock tree is exposed as a platform driver that binds to a device named 'clk-lpt'. To support this we modify the acpi_create_platform_device() to take one additional parameter called flags. This is passed from acpi_platform_device_ids[] array when acpi_create_platform_device() is called. We then introduce a new flag ACPI_PLATFORM_CLK which is used to tell acpi_create_platform_device() to create the platform clocks as well. Finally we set the ACPI_PLATFORM_CLK flags for all the Lynxpoint LPSS devices and make sure that when this flag is set we create the corresponding clock tree platform device. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-19ACPI: add support for CSRT tableMika Westerberg1-0/+1
Core System Resources Table (CSRT) is a proprietary ACPI table that contains resources for certain devices that are not found in the DSDT table. Typically a shared DMA controller might be found here. This patch adds support for this table. We go through all entries in the table and make platform devices of them. The resources from the table are passed with the platform device. There is one special resource in the table and it is the DMA request line base and number of request lines. This information might be needed by the DMA controller driver as it needs to map the ACPI DMA request line number to the actual request line understood by the hardware. This range is passed as IORESOURCE_DMA resource. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-19ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() insteadRafael J. Wysocki1-32/+22
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-18Merge branch 'acpi-scan' into acpi-lpssRafael J. Wysocki1-204/+116
The following commits depend on the 'acpi-scan' material.
2013-01-17ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+11
The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into accountRafael J. Wysocki1-32/+25
Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources listsRafael J. Wysocki1-30/+21
The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / scan: Remove unnecessary initialization of local variablesRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+3
The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / scan: Move power state initialization to a separate routineRafael J. Wysocki1-41/+46
To reduce indentation level and improve code readability, move the initialization code related to device power states from acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to a new routine, acpi_bus_init_power_state(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup power resources into accountRafael J. Wysocki1-10/+16
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into accountRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+26
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI: Drop power resources driverRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+0
The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special wayRafael J. Wysocki1-30/+17
ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-17ACPI / scan: More straightforward preparation of ACPI device objectsRafael J. Wysocki1-117/+61
Simplify the code preparing struct acpi_device objects for registration by removing useless code, moving different pieces of code into the functions they belong to and making a couple of int functions always returning 0 void. This also fixes a possible memory leak in ACPI device registration error code path by making acpi_device_register() detach data from device->handle if device_register() fails and prepares the scanning code for special-casing ACPI power resources (next patch). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>