summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-12-21ACPI / processor: Fix thermal cooling device regressionSrinivas Pandruvada1-1/+2
The processor cooling device is no longer present for passive thermal control. Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver") moved the processing to a new function acpi_pss_perf_init(), but missed "return 0" after successful creation. This causes the error handling functions to be called, which will delete the previously created processor cooling device. Fixes: 239708a3af44 (ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver) Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-12CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor objectAshwin Chaugule1-0/+6
For each detected ACPI Processor object (ACPI0007), search its device handle for CPPC specific tables (i.e. _CPC) and extract CPU specific performance capabilities. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-01Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-assorted'Rafael J. Wysocki1-33/+59
* acpi-scan: ACPI / bus: Move ACPI bus type registration ACPI / scan: Move bus operations and notification routines to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move device matching code to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move sysfs-related device code to a separate file * acpi-processor: PCC: Disable compilation by default ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver PCC: Initialize PCC Mailbox earlier at boot ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations * acpi-assorted: ACPI: fix acpi_debugfs_init prototype ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses
2015-08-25ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driverAshwin Chaugule1-28/+58
The ACPI processor driver is currently tied too closely to the ACPI P-states (PSS) and other related constructs for controlling CPU performance. The newer ACPI specification (v5.1 onwards) introduces alternative methods to PSS. These new mechanisms are described within each ACPI Processor object and so they need to be scanned whenever a new Processor object is detected. This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol to allow for finer configurability among the two options for controlling performance states. There is no change in functionality and the option is auto-selected by the architectures which support it. A future commit will introduce support for CPPC: A newer method of controlling CPU performance. The OS is not expected to support CPPC and PSS at the same time, so the Kconfig option lets us make the two mutually exclusive at compile time. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-21ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotationsMathias Krause1-1/+1
The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used to be prior to commit fe7bf106ebc2 ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add(). But with that commit in place that requirement has gone. The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block. acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata annotation isn't needed there either. Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future section mismatches. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-08ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addressesJarkko Nikula1-4/+0
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-08-06ACPI / processor: Make acpi_cpu_soft_notify() process CPU FROZEN eventsLan Tianyu1-0/+1
CPU hotplug happens during S2RAM and CPU notify event will be CPU_XXX_FROZEN. acpi_cpu_soft_notify() ignores to check these events. This also may make acpi_cpu_soft_notify() fall into sleep during CPU_DYING/STARTING_FROZEN events which don't allow callbacks to sleep. This patch is to fix it. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-16ACPI / processor: Fix STARTING/DYING action in acpi_cpu_soft_notify()Toshi Kani1-0/+7
During CPU online/offline testing on a large system, one of the processors got stuck after the message "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!". The problem is that acpi_cpu_soft_notify() calls acpi_bus_get_device() for all action types. CPU_STARTING and CPU_DYING do not allow the notify handlers to sleep. However, acpi_bus_get_device() can sleep in acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(). Change acpi_cpu_soft_notify() to return immediately for CPU_STARTING and CPU_DYING as they have no action in this handler. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-19ACPI: Remove duplicate definitions of PREFIXHanjun Guo1-2/+0
We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07ACPI / processor: use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI deviceLan Tianyu1-4/+4
Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get an ACPI device instead of acpi_bus_get_device() in the processor driver. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-30ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directlyRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+0
Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs. Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that function isn't really necessary any more. For this reason, drop acpi_processor_load_module() entirely. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-07ACPI / processor: fixed a brace coding style issueMathieu Rhéaume1-2/+1
Fixed a brace coding style issue. (Brace not on the good line) Signed-off-by: Mathieu Rhéaume <mathieu@codingrhemes.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-27Merge branch 'acpi-processor'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+3
* acpi-processor: ACPI / processor: Acquire writer lock to update CPU maps ACPI / processor: Remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info()
2013-08-14Merge back earlier 'acpi-assorted' materialRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+0
2013-08-13ACPI / processor: Remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info()Lan Tianyu1-1/+3
acpi_processor_get_limit_info() is only called in the __acpi_processor_start() and what it does actually is just to check pr->flags.throttling and set limit. The pr pointer has been checked in the __acpi_processor_start() before acpi_processor_get_limit_info() being called. It doesn't make sense still to keep it as a function. So move code to __acpi_processor_start() and remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info(). Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: Remove the old /proc/acpi/event interfaceThomas Renninger1-4/+0
It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated. Get rid of it. Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something to get rid of this old stuff... Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-14acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi filesPaul Gortmaker1-4/+4
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-06-24ACPI / processor: Remove unused macros in processor_driver.cHanjun Guo1-6/+0
ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_INFO, ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_THROTTLING and ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_LIMIT are used for procfs, but this feature was removed in commit d09fe555 (ACPI processor: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F) long ago. So, these macros should also be removed. ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_USER and ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_THERMAL are not used by any code, remove them too. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-30ACPI / processor: Initialize per_cpu(processors, pr->id) properlyRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+0
Commit ac212b6 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure) forgot about initializing the per-CPU 'processors' variables which lead to ACPI cpuidle failure to use C-states and caused boot slowdown on multi-CPU machines. Fix the problem by adding per_cpu(processors, pr->id) initialization to acpi_processor_add() and add make acpi_processor_remove() clean it up as appropriate. Also modify acpi_processor_stop() so that it doesn't clear per_cpu(processors, pr->id) on processor driver removal which would then cause problems to happen when the driver is loaded again. This version of the patch contains fixes from Yinghai Lu. Reported-and-tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructureRafael J. Wysocki1-729/+78
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure. It also populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's .attach() routine is running. There are a few reasons to make this change. First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably, even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc. Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove is unset). That is a more desirable behavior than what the current code does. Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine, because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate). Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management). Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / PM: Move processor suspend/resume to syscore_opsRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+4
The system suspend routine of the ACPI processor driver saves the BUS_MASTER_RLD register and its resume routine restores it. However, there can be only one such register in the system and it really should be saved after non-boot CPUs have been offlined and restored before they are put back online during resume. For this reason, move the saving and restoration of BUS_MASTER_RLD to syscore suspend and syscore resume, respectively, and drop the no longer necessary suspend/resume callbacks from the ACPI processor driver. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-04ACPI / porocessor: Beautify code, pr->id is u32 which is never < 0Chen Gang1-1/+1
pr->id is u32 which never < 0, so remove the redundant pr->id < 0 check from acpi_processor_add(). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-23cpu-hotplug, memory-hotplug: try offlining the node when hotremoving a cpuWen Congyang1-0/+2
The node will be offlined when all memory/cpu on the node is hotremoved. So we should try offline the node when hotremoving a cpu on the node. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-13ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaksRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+17
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-26ACPI: Remove useless type argument of driver .remove() operationRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+3
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-19ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() insteadRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-15ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_deviceYinghai Lu1-1/+1
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and get the device pointer again later. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argumentRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+6
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add() too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that handle). For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device() anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan() executed directly from acpi_scan_init(). Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not usedRafael J. Wysocki1-23/+1
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed lines of code (Linus will like that). Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make note to self to take care of that later). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2012-11-21ACPI: Update CPU hotplug error messagesToshi Kani1-15/+24
Updated CPU hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(), dev_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Modified some messages for clarity. Added error status / id info to the messages where needed. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Add ACPI CPU hot-remove supportToshi Kani1-10/+17
Added support of CPU hot-remove via an ACPI eject notification. It calls acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which shares the same code path with the sysfs eject operation. acpi_os_hotplug_execute() runs the hot-remove operation in kacpi_hotplug_wq and serializes it between ACPI hot-remove and sysfs eject requests. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: IgorMammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / processor: prevent cpu from becoming onlineYasuaki Ishimatsu1-0/+14
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using get/put_online_cpus(). Why does the patch change _cpu_up() logic? The patch cares the race of hot-remove cpu and _cpu_up(). If the patch does not change it, there is the following race. hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | call put_online_cpus() | | start and continue _cpu_up() return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | So _cpu_up() can continue to itself. And hot-remove cpu can also continue itself. If the patch changes _cpu_up() logic, the race disappears as below: hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ----------------------------------------------------------------------- call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | cpu's cpu_present is set | to false by set_cpu_present()| call put_online_cpus() | | start _cpu_up() | check cpu_present() and return -EINVAL return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-10-26ACPI: missing breakAlan Cox1-0/+1
We handle NOTIFY_THROTTLING so don't then fall through to unsupported event. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-09-15ACPI / processor: remove pointless variable initializationDaniel Lezcano1-2/+0
The 'errata' variable is a global variable which is set to zero, no need to do that with a memset in the init function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-09-15ACPI / processor: remove unused function parameterDaniel Lezcano1-3/+3
The 'device' parameter is not used neither in acpi_processor_power_init and acpi_processor_power_exit. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-08-03Merge branches 'delete-gts-bfs', 'misc', 'novell-bugzilla-757888-numa' and ↵Len Brown1-10/+5
'osc-pcie' into base
2012-08-03ACPI processor: Fix tick_broadcast_mask online/offline regressionFeng Tang1-1/+1
In commit 99b725084 "ACPI processor hotplug: Delay acpi_processor_start() call for hotplugged cores", acpi_processor_hotplug(pr) was wrongly replaced by acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() inside the acpi_cpu_soft_notify(). This patch will restore it back, fixing the tick_broadcast_mask regression: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/30/169 Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-07-26Merge branch 'release' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-8/+20
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux Pull ACPI & power management update from Len Brown: "Re-write of the turbostat tool. lower overhead was necessary for measuring very large system when they are very idle. IVB support in intel_idle It's what I run on my IVB, others should be able to also:-) ACPICA core update We have found some bugs due to divergence between Linux and the upstream ACPICA base. Most of these patches are to reduce that divergence to reduce the risk of future bugs. Some cpuidle updates, mostly for non-Intel More will be coming, as they depend on this part. Some thermal management changes needed by non-ACPI systems. Some _OST (OS Status Indication) updates for hot ACPI hot-plug." * 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux: (51 commits) Thermal: Documentation update Thermal: Add Hysteresis attributes Thermal: Make Thermal trip points writeable ACPI/AC: prevent OOPS on some boxes due to missing check power_supply_register() return value check tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue tools/power: turbostat v2 - re-write for efficiency ACPICA: Update to version 20120711 ACPICA: AcpiSrc: Fix some translation issues for Linux conversion ACPICA: Update header files copyrights to 2012 ACPICA: Add new ACPI table load/unload external interfaces ACPICA: Split file: tbxface.c -> tbxfload.c ACPICA: Add PCC address space to space ID decode function ACPICA: Fix some comment fields ACPICA: Table manager: deploy new firmware error/warning interfaces ACPICA: Add new interfaces for BIOS(firmware) errors and warnings ACPICA: Split exception code utilities to a new file, utexcep.c ACPI: acpi_pad: tune round_robin_time ACPICA: Update to version 20120620 ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devices ACPICA: Update comments; no functional change ...
2012-07-19Merge branch 'pm-acpi'Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+4
* pm-acpi: (24 commits) olpc-xo15-sci: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management ACPI / PM: Drop PM callbacks from the ACPI bus type ACPI / PM: Drop legacy driver PM callbacks that are not used any more ACPI / PM: Do not execute legacy driver PM callbacks acpi_power_meter: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management fujitsu-tablet: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management classmate-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management xo15-ebook: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management toshiba_bluetooth: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management panasonic-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management sony-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management hp_accel: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management toshiba_acpi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the SBS driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the power driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the button driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the battery driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the AC driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in processor driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the thermal driver ...
2012-07-05ACPI: intel_idle : break dependency between modulesDaniel Lezcano1-7/+0
When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi. This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported functions. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in processor driverRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+4
Make the ACPI processor driver define its PM callbacks through a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks in struct acpi_device_ops. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-06-04ACPI: Add _OST support for ACPI CPU hotplugToshi Kani1-8/+20
Changed acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() to call ACPI _OST method when ACPI CPU hotplug operation has completed. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30Merge branch 'release' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-14/+48
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux Pull ACPI & Power Management changes from Len Brown: - ACPI 5.0 after-ripples, ACPICA/Linux divergence cleanup - cpuidle evolving, more ARM use - thermal sub-system evolving, ditto - assorted other PM bits Fix up conflicts in various cpuidle implementations due to ARM cpuidle cleanups (ARM at91 self-refresh and cpu idle code rewritten into "standby" in asm conflicting with the consolidation of cpuidle time keeping), trivial SH include file context conflict and RCU tracing fixes in generic code. * 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux: (77 commits) ACPI throttling: fix endian bug in acpi_read_throttling_status() Disable MCP limit exceeded messages from Intel IPS driver ACPI video: Don't start video device until its associated input device has been allocated ACPI video: Harden video bus adding. ACPI: Add support for exposing BGRT data ACPI: export acpi_kobj ACPI: Fix logic for removing mappings in 'acpi_unmap' CPER failed to handle generic error records with multiple sections ACPI: Clean redundant codes in scan.c ACPI: Fix unprotected smp_processor_id() in acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() ACPI: consistently use should_use_kmap() PNPACPI: Fix device ref leaking in acpi_pnp_match ACPI: Fix use-after-free in acpi_map_lsapic ACPI: processor_driver: add missing kfree ACPI, APEI: Fix incorrect APEI register bit width check and usage Update documentation for parameter *notrigger* in einj.txt ACPI, APEI, EINJ, new parameter to control trigger action ACPI, APEI, EINJ, limit the range of einj_param ACPI, APEI, Fix ERST header length check cpuidle: power_usage should be declared signed integer ...
2012-03-30Merge branches 'acpica', 'bgrt', 'bz-11533', 'cpuidle', 'ec', 'hotplug', ↵Len Brown1-14/+48
'misc', 'red-hat-bz-727865', 'thermal', 'throttling', 'turbostat' and 'video' into release Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30ACPI: processor_driver: add missing kfreeJulia Lawall1-4/+10
The function acpi_processor_add is stored in the ops.add field of a acpi_driver structure. This function is then called in acpi_bus_driver_init. On failure, this function clears the field device->driver_data, but does not free its contents. Thus the free has to be done by the add function. In acpi_processor_add, the corresponding value is pr. This value is currently freed on failure before storing it in device->driver_data, but not after. This free is added in the error handling code at the end of the function. The per_cpu variable processors is also cleared so that it does not refer to a dangling pointer. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30ACPI: Add CPU hotplug support for processor device objectsToshi Kani1-10/+38
acpi_processor_install_hotplug_notify() registers processor objects to receive ACPI CPU hotplug event notifications. This patch additionally registers processor device objects (ACPI0007) to receive the notifications as well. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-28Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.hDavid Howells1-1/+0
Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing it. Performed with the following command: perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *` Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2012-02-08ACPI: remove duplicated lines of merging problems with acpi_processor_startYinghai Lu1-17/+1
When checking driver-core tree, found crazying warnings on my setups. [ 216.025849] calling acpi_processor_init+0x0/0x81 @ 1 [ 216.045332] ACPI: Requesting acpi_cpufreq [ 216.047454] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-1 state [ 216.047912] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-3 state [ 216.065270] ACPI: acpi_idle registered with cpuidle [ 216.068241] kobject (ffff8870364a1940): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong. [ 216.085287] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-tip-yh-02428-ge663840-dirty #247 [ 216.105041] Call Trace: [ 216.105192] [<ffffffff813a9c06>] kobject_init+0x33/0x83 [ 216.124880] [<ffffffff813aa1f8>] kobject_init_and_add+0x23/0x57 [ 216.125158] [<ffffffff819f3a08>] cpuidle_add_sysfs+0x49/0x62 [ 216.144850] [<ffffffff819f2a28>] __cpuidle_register_device+0xe6/0x10e [ 216.145182] [<ffffffff819f2ea4>] cpuidle_register_device+0x25/0x4d [ 216.164912] [<ffffffff81cb5774>] acpi_processor_power_init+0x13e/0x16c [ 216.165205] [<ffffffff81427620>] ? acpi_processor_get_throttling_info+0x128/0x158 [ 216.185012] [<ffffffff81c68ae5>] acpi_processor_start+0x62/0x11d [ 216.204861] [<ffffffff81cb55ff>] acpi_processor_add+0x1b0/0x1e7 [ 216.205144] [<ffffffff81402a7e>] acpi_device_probe+0x4e/0x11c [ 216.225063] [<ffffffff8148f0e7>] really_probe+0x99/0x126 [ 216.225328] [<ffffffff8148f2a3>] driver_probe_device+0x3b/0x56 [ 216.244846] [<ffffffff8148f31d>] __driver_attach+0x5f/0x82 [ 216.245101] [<ffffffff8148f2be>] ? driver_probe_device+0x56/0x56 [ 216.264668] [<ffffffff8148db80>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x88 [ 216.264942] [<ffffffff8148eea7>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [ 216.284639] [<ffffffff8148eaec>] bus_add_driver+0xca/0x21d [ 216.284903] [<ffffffff81095827>] ? local_clock+0xf/0x3c [ 216.304580] [<ffffffff82814177>] ? acpi_fan_init+0x18/0x18 [ 216.304849] [<ffffffff8148f79b>] driver_register+0x91/0xfe [ 216.324545] [<ffffffff82814177>] ? acpi_fan_init+0x18/0x18 [ 216.324813] [<ffffffff81403705>] acpi_bus_register_driver+0x43/0x45 [ 216.344563] [<ffffffff828141a7>] acpi_processor_init+0x30/0x81 [ 216.344845] [<ffffffff82814177>] ? acpi_fan_init+0x18/0x18 [ 216.364590] [<ffffffff810001e7>] do_one_initcall+0x57/0x134 [ 216.364868] [<ffffffff827e6f8c>] kernel_init+0x146/0x1c0 [ 216.384512] [<ffffffff81d03aa4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 216.384819] [<ffffffff81cfbb5d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 216.404578] [<ffffffff827e6e46>] ? start_kernel+0x3ab/0x3ab [ 216.424530] [<ffffffff81d03aa0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb [ 216.424793] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 216.425038] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:502 sysfs_add_one+0x97/0xab() [ 216.444480] Hardware name: Sun Fire X4800 [ 216.444668] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle' ... It turns out acpi_processor_power_init() get called two time in acpi_processor_add and acpi_processor_start. Found several lines are duplicated in those two functions even related commit move them. The related patches are ok. Not sure how it could happen, looks like git problem. -v2: add back acpi_processor_load_module(pr) to acpi_processor_load_start Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-02-07ACPI: remove duplicated lines of merging problems with acpi_processor_addYinghai Lu1-7/+0
Those lines have two copies. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-02-02Merge 3.3-rc2 into the driver-core-next branch.Greg Kroah-Hartman1-26/+109
This was done to resolve a merge and build problem with the drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c file. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>