summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-08-28ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifierViresh Kumar1-4/+35
The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on. Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint for acpi driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 157Thomas Gleixner1-14/+1
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory] [gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema] [hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-07-27ACPI: processor: use dev_dbg() instead of dev_warn() when CPPC probe failedHanjun Guo1-1/+1
_CPC is a optinal object for processor device so it's fine for processor devices in DSDT without CPPC data, but when booting the system with CPPC enabled in the kernel but without its support in the firmware, I got lots of warnings on a 64 core system: [ 6.346016] acpi ACPI0007:00: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346028] acpi ACPI0007:01: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346039] acpi ACPI0007:02: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346050] acpi ACPI0007:03: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346063] acpi ACPI0007:04: CPPC data invalid or not present ... [ 6.346737] acpi ACPI0007:3f: CPPC data invalid or not present This isn't much useful and a little bit noise, so switch the dev_warn() to dev_dbg(). Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-26ACPI/processor: Use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus()Thomas Gleixner1-2/+2
Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden from lockdep due to the lockdep annotation of get_online_cpus() which prevents lockdep from creating full dependency chains. CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((&wfc.work)); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); lock((&wfc.work)); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); This dependency is established via acpi_processor_start() which calls into the work queue code. And the work queue code establishes the reverse dependency. This is not a problem of get_online_cpus() recursion, it's a possible deadlock undetected by lockdep so far. The cure is to use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus() to protect the probing from acpi_processor_start(). There is a side effect to this: cpu_hotplug_disable() makes a concurrent cpu hotplug attempt via the sysfs interfaces fail with -EBUSY, but that probing usually happens during the boot process where no interaction is possible. Any later invocations are infrequent enough and concurrent hotplug attempts are so unlikely that the danger of user space visible regressions is very close to zero. Anyway, thats preferrable over a real deadlock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081548.851588594@linutronix.de
2017-04-15ACPI/processor: Replace racy task affinity logicThomas Gleixner1-1/+6
acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the calling user space thread to the requested CPU and reset it to the original affinity afterwards. That's racy vs. CPU hotplug and concurrent affinity settings for that thread resulting in code executing on the wrong CPU and overwriting the new affinity setting. acpi_processor_get_throttling() is invoked in two ways: 1) The CPU online callback, which is already running on the target CPU and obviously protected against hotplug and not affected by affinity settings. 2) The ACPI driver probe function, which is not protected against hotplug during modprobe. Switch it over to work_on_cpu() and protect the probe function against CPU hotplug. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412201042.785920903@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-04-15ACPI/processor: Fix error handling in __acpi_processor_start()Thomas Gleixner1-0/+3
When acpi_install_notify_handler() fails the cooling device stays registered and the sysfs files created via acpi_pss_perf_init() are leaked and the function returns success. Undo acpi_pss_perf_init() and return a proper error code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412201042.695499645@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-10-03Merge branch 'smp-hotplug-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-44/+47
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull CPU hotplug updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Yet another batch of cpu hotplug core updates and conversions: - Provide core infrastructure for multi instance drivers so the drivers do not have to keep custom lists. - Convert custom lists to the new infrastructure. The block-mq custom list conversion comes through the block tree and makes the diffstat tip over to more lines removed than added. - Handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable calls more gracefully. - Remove the obsolete CPU_STARTING/DYING notifier support. - Convert another batch of notifier users. The relayfs changes which conflicted with the conversion have been shipped to me by Andrew. The remaining lot is targeted for 4.10 so that we finally can remove the rest of the notifiers" * 'smp-hotplug-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (46 commits) cpufreq: Fix up conversion to hotplug state machine blk/mq: Reserve hotplug states for block multiqueue x86/apic/uv: Convert to hotplug state machine s390/mm/pfault: Convert to hotplug state machine mips/loongson/smp: Convert to hotplug state machine mips/octeon/smp: Convert to hotplug state machine fault-injection/cpu: Convert to hotplug state machine padata: Convert to hotplug state machine cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine ACPI/processor: Convert to hotplug state machine virtio scsi: Convert to hotplug state machine oprofile/timer: Convert to hotplug state machine block/softirq: Convert to hotplug state machine lib/irq_poll: Convert to hotplug state machine x86/microcode: Convert to hotplug state machine sh/SH-X3 SMP: Convert to hotplug state machine ia64/mca: Convert to hotplug state machine ARM/OMAP/wakeupgen: Convert to hotplug state machine ARM/shmobile: Convert to hotplug state machine arm64/FP/SIMD: Convert to hotplug state machine ...
2016-09-19ACPI/processor: Convert to hotplug state machineSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-44/+47
Install the callbacks via the state machine. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: rt@linutronix.de Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906170457.32393-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-08ACPI / CPPC: Don't return on CPPC probe failureSrinivas Pandruvada1-1/+1
It is still possible to continue even CPPC data is invalid or missing. Suggested-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-08ACPI / CPPC: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS configSrinivas Pandruvada1-1/+1
Some newer x86 platforms have support for both _CPC and _PSS object. So kernel config can have both ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS and ACPI_CPPC_LIB. So remove restriction for ACPI_CPPC_LIB to build only when ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not defined. Also for legacy systems with only _PSS, we shouldn't bail out if acpi_cppc_processor_probe() fails, if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is also defined. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-29Merge branch 'smp-hotplug-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-5/+6
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull smp hotplug updates from Thomas Gleixner: "This is the next part of the hotplug rework. - Convert all notifiers with a priority assigned - Convert all CPU_STARTING/DYING notifiers The final removal of the STARTING/DYING infrastructure will happen when the merge window closes. Another 700 hundred line of unpenetrable maze gone :)" * 'smp-hotplug-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (70 commits) timers/core: Correct callback order during CPU hot plug leds/trigger/cpu: Move from CPU_STARTING to ONLINE level powerpc/numa: Convert to hotplug state machine arm/perf: Fix hotplug state machine conversion irqchip/armada: Avoid unused function warnings ARC/time: Convert to hotplug state machine clocksource/atlas7: Convert to hotplug state machine clocksource/armada-370-xp: Convert to hotplug state machine clocksource/exynos_mct: Convert to hotplug state machine clocksource/arm_global_timer: Convert to hotplug state machine rcu: Convert rcutree to hotplug state machine KVM/arm/arm64/vgic-new: Convert to hotplug state machine smp/cfd: Convert core to hotplug state machine x86/x2apic: Convert to CPU hotplug state machine profile: Convert to hotplug state machine timers/core: Convert to hotplug state machine hrtimer: Convert to hotplug state machine x86/tboot: Convert to hotplug state machine arm64/armv8 deprecated: Convert to hotplug state machine hwtracing/coresight-etm4x: Convert to hotplug state machine ...
2016-07-21ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) statesSudeep Holla1-1/+1
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM. Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform coordinated and OS initiated. This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-15ACPI/processor: Avoid STARTING/DYING actions in a more logical wayRichard Cochran1-5/+6
As part of the hotplug cleanup, the CPU_STARTING/DYING actions are going away soon. This driver needlessly uses those two macro, and so this patch replaces that code with something more sensible. Commit: 8da8373447d6a57a5a9f55233d35beb15d92d0d2 ("ACPI / processor: Fix STARTING/DYING action in acpi_cpu_soft_notify()") added checks for those two actions, because the notification callback can sleep, causing a hung CPU. This patch instead checks for the ONLINE/DEAD actions, which are the ones that are handled by the driver in the first place. Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: rt@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160713153335.964962885@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-02-22ACPI / sleep: move acpi_processor_sleep to sleep.cSudeep Holla1-2/+0
acpi_processor_sleep is neither related nor used by CPUIdle framework. It's used in system suspend/resume path as a syscore operation. It makes more sense to move it to acpi/sleep.c where all the S-state transition (a.k.a. Linux system suspend/hiberate) related code are present. Also make it depend on CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT so that it's not compiled on architecture like ARM64 where S-states are not yet defined in ACPI. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-12-21ACPI / processor: Fix thermal cooling device regressionSrinivas Pandruvada1-1/+2
The processor cooling device is no longer present for passive thermal control. Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver") moved the processing to a new function acpi_pss_perf_init(), but missed "return 0" after successful creation. This causes the error handling functions to be called, which will delete the previously created processor cooling device. Fixes: 239708a3af44 (ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver) Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-12CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor objectAshwin Chaugule1-0/+6
For each detected ACPI Processor object (ACPI0007), search its device handle for CPPC specific tables (i.e. _CPC) and extract CPU specific performance capabilities. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-01Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-assorted'Rafael J. Wysocki1-33/+59
* acpi-scan: ACPI / bus: Move ACPI bus type registration ACPI / scan: Move bus operations and notification routines to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move device matching code to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move sysfs-related device code to a separate file * acpi-processor: PCC: Disable compilation by default ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver PCC: Initialize PCC Mailbox earlier at boot ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations * acpi-assorted: ACPI: fix acpi_debugfs_init prototype ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses
2015-08-25ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driverAshwin Chaugule1-28/+58
The ACPI processor driver is currently tied too closely to the ACPI P-states (PSS) and other related constructs for controlling CPU performance. The newer ACPI specification (v5.1 onwards) introduces alternative methods to PSS. These new mechanisms are described within each ACPI Processor object and so they need to be scanned whenever a new Processor object is detected. This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol to allow for finer configurability among the two options for controlling performance states. There is no change in functionality and the option is auto-selected by the architectures which support it. A future commit will introduce support for CPPC: A newer method of controlling CPU performance. The OS is not expected to support CPPC and PSS at the same time, so the Kconfig option lets us make the two mutually exclusive at compile time. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-21ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotationsMathias Krause1-1/+1
The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used to be prior to commit fe7bf106ebc2 ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add(). But with that commit in place that requirement has gone. The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block. acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata annotation isn't needed there either. Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future section mismatches. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-08ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addressesJarkko Nikula1-4/+0
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-08-06ACPI / processor: Make acpi_cpu_soft_notify() process CPU FROZEN eventsLan Tianyu1-0/+1
CPU hotplug happens during S2RAM and CPU notify event will be CPU_XXX_FROZEN. acpi_cpu_soft_notify() ignores to check these events. This also may make acpi_cpu_soft_notify() fall into sleep during CPU_DYING/STARTING_FROZEN events which don't allow callbacks to sleep. This patch is to fix it. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-16ACPI / processor: Fix STARTING/DYING action in acpi_cpu_soft_notify()Toshi Kani1-0/+7
During CPU online/offline testing on a large system, one of the processors got stuck after the message "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!". The problem is that acpi_cpu_soft_notify() calls acpi_bus_get_device() for all action types. CPU_STARTING and CPU_DYING do not allow the notify handlers to sleep. However, acpi_bus_get_device() can sleep in acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(). Change acpi_cpu_soft_notify() to return immediately for CPU_STARTING and CPU_DYING as they have no action in this handler. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-19ACPI: Remove duplicate definitions of PREFIXHanjun Guo1-2/+0
We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07ACPI / processor: use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI deviceLan Tianyu1-4/+4
Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get an ACPI device instead of acpi_bus_get_device() in the processor driver. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-30ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directlyRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+0
Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs. Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that function isn't really necessary any more. For this reason, drop acpi_processor_load_module() entirely. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-07ACPI / processor: fixed a brace coding style issueMathieu Rhéaume1-2/+1
Fixed a brace coding style issue. (Brace not on the good line) Signed-off-by: Mathieu Rhéaume <mathieu@codingrhemes.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-27Merge branch 'acpi-processor'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+3
* acpi-processor: ACPI / processor: Acquire writer lock to update CPU maps ACPI / processor: Remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info()
2013-08-14Merge back earlier 'acpi-assorted' materialRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+0
2013-08-13ACPI / processor: Remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info()Lan Tianyu1-1/+3
acpi_processor_get_limit_info() is only called in the __acpi_processor_start() and what it does actually is just to check pr->flags.throttling and set limit. The pr pointer has been checked in the __acpi_processor_start() before acpi_processor_get_limit_info() being called. It doesn't make sense still to keep it as a function. So move code to __acpi_processor_start() and remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info(). Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: Remove the old /proc/acpi/event interfaceThomas Renninger1-4/+0
It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated. Get rid of it. Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something to get rid of this old stuff... Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-14acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi filesPaul Gortmaker1-4/+4
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-06-24ACPI / processor: Remove unused macros in processor_driver.cHanjun Guo1-6/+0
ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_INFO, ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_THROTTLING and ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_LIMIT are used for procfs, but this feature was removed in commit d09fe555 (ACPI processor: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F) long ago. So, these macros should also be removed. ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_USER and ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_THERMAL are not used by any code, remove them too. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-30ACPI / processor: Initialize per_cpu(processors, pr->id) properlyRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+0
Commit ac212b6 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure) forgot about initializing the per-CPU 'processors' variables which lead to ACPI cpuidle failure to use C-states and caused boot slowdown on multi-CPU machines. Fix the problem by adding per_cpu(processors, pr->id) initialization to acpi_processor_add() and add make acpi_processor_remove() clean it up as appropriate. Also modify acpi_processor_stop() so that it doesn't clear per_cpu(processors, pr->id) on processor driver removal which would then cause problems to happen when the driver is loaded again. This version of the patch contains fixes from Yinghai Lu. Reported-and-tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructureRafael J. Wysocki1-729/+78
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure. It also populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's .attach() routine is running. There are a few reasons to make this change. First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably, even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc. Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove is unset). That is a more desirable behavior than what the current code does. Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine, because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate). Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management). Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / PM: Move processor suspend/resume to syscore_opsRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+4
The system suspend routine of the ACPI processor driver saves the BUS_MASTER_RLD register and its resume routine restores it. However, there can be only one such register in the system and it really should be saved after non-boot CPUs have been offlined and restored before they are put back online during resume. For this reason, move the saving and restoration of BUS_MASTER_RLD to syscore suspend and syscore resume, respectively, and drop the no longer necessary suspend/resume callbacks from the ACPI processor driver. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-04ACPI / porocessor: Beautify code, pr->id is u32 which is never < 0Chen Gang1-1/+1
pr->id is u32 which never < 0, so remove the redundant pr->id < 0 check from acpi_processor_add(). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-23cpu-hotplug, memory-hotplug: try offlining the node when hotremoving a cpuWen Congyang1-0/+2
The node will be offlined when all memory/cpu on the node is hotremoved. So we should try offline the node when hotremoving a cpu on the node. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-13ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaksRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+17
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-26ACPI: Remove useless type argument of driver .remove() operationRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+3
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-19ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() insteadRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-15ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_deviceYinghai Lu1-1/+1
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and get the device pointer again later. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argumentRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+6
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add() too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that handle). For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device() anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan() executed directly from acpi_scan_init(). Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not usedRafael J. Wysocki1-23/+1
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed lines of code (Linus will like that). Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make note to self to take care of that later). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2012-11-21ACPI: Update CPU hotplug error messagesToshi Kani1-15/+24
Updated CPU hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(), dev_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Modified some messages for clarity. Added error status / id info to the messages where needed. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Add ACPI CPU hot-remove supportToshi Kani1-10/+17
Added support of CPU hot-remove via an ACPI eject notification. It calls acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which shares the same code path with the sysfs eject operation. acpi_os_hotplug_execute() runs the hot-remove operation in kacpi_hotplug_wq and serializes it between ACPI hot-remove and sysfs eject requests. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: IgorMammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / processor: prevent cpu from becoming onlineYasuaki Ishimatsu1-0/+14
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using get/put_online_cpus(). Why does the patch change _cpu_up() logic? The patch cares the race of hot-remove cpu and _cpu_up(). If the patch does not change it, there is the following race. hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | call put_online_cpus() | | start and continue _cpu_up() return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | So _cpu_up() can continue to itself. And hot-remove cpu can also continue itself. If the patch changes _cpu_up() logic, the race disappears as below: hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ----------------------------------------------------------------------- call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | cpu's cpu_present is set | to false by set_cpu_present()| call put_online_cpus() | | start _cpu_up() | check cpu_present() and return -EINVAL return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-10-26ACPI: missing breakAlan Cox1-0/+1
We handle NOTIFY_THROTTLING so don't then fall through to unsupported event. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-09-15ACPI / processor: remove pointless variable initializationDaniel Lezcano1-2/+0
The 'errata' variable is a global variable which is set to zero, no need to do that with a memset in the init function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-09-15ACPI / processor: remove unused function parameterDaniel Lezcano1-3/+3
The 'device' parameter is not used neither in acpi_processor_power_init and acpi_processor_power_exit. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-08-03Merge branches 'delete-gts-bfs', 'misc', 'novell-bugzilla-757888-numa' and ↵Len Brown1-10/+5
'osc-pcie' into base