summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/proc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-09-15ACPI: change acpi_sleep_proc_init() to return voidRami Rosen1-3/+1
This patch changes the type of the return value of the acpi_sleep_proc_init() method to be void, as this method never fails and its return value is never used. Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>\ [ rjw : Fixed up the static inline stub ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-05ACPI / proc: remove unneeded NULL checkDan Carpenter1-1/+1
We already verified that "ldev" was non-NULL earlier and also we dereference again without checking a three lines later. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-06ACPI / proc: Include appropriate header file in proc.cRashika1-0/+1
Include appropriate header file internal.h in proc.c because function acpi_sleep_proc_init() has its prototype declaration in internal.h. This eliminates the following warning in proc.c: drivers/acpi/proc.c:148:12: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_sleep_proc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header filesLv Zheng1-3/+1
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-12ACPI / proc: Remove alarm proc fileLan Tianyu1-305/+0
Alarm proc file provides the info and control of RTC-CMOS alarm and RTC CMOS driver provides wakealarm sysfs attribute for the same purpose. The alarm file isn't compiled into kernel when RTC CMOS driver is selected. The driver is default to be selected for x86 platform. So alarm file is default not to include. This patch is to remove it to prepare remove /proc/acpi directory. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-06ACPI / PM: Walk physical_node_list under physical_node_lockRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+8
The list of physical devices corresponding to an ACPI device object is walked by acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show() and physical_device_enable_wakeup() without taking that object's physical_node_lock mutex. Since each of those functions may be run at any time as a result of a user space action, the lack of appropriate locking in them may lead to a kernel crash if that happens during device hot-add or hot-remove involving the device object in question. Fix the issue by modifying acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show() and physical_device_enable_wakeup() to use physical_node_lock as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: All <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2013-04-09procfs: new helper - PDE_DATA(inode)Al Viro1-2/+2
The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc really cares about is PDE(inode)->data. Provide a helper for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry layout. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-01-27ACPI / PM: Fix /proc/acpi/wakeup for devices w/o bus or parentAndreas Fleig1-4/+5
Fix /proc/acpi/wakeup for devices without bus or parent This patch fixes printing the wakeup status for devices without a bus or parent, such as laptop lid switches and sleep buttons. These devices have an empty physical_node_list, because acpi_bind_one is never run for them. [rjw: White space and coding style.] Signed-off-by: Andreas Fleig <andreasfleig@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-22ACPI: drop unnecessary local variable from acpi_system_write_wakeup_device()Cyril Roelandt1-7/+4
The LEN variable is unsigned, therefore checking whether it is less than 0 is useless. Also drop the LEN variable, since the COUNT parameter can be used instead. [rjw: Changed the subject.] Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-09-21ACPI: Allow ACPI binding with USB-3.0 hubLan Tianyu1-20/+37
A USB port's position and connectability can't be identified on some boards via USB hub registers. ACPI _UPC and _PLD can help to resolve this issue and so it is necessary to bind USB with ACPI. This patch is to allow ACPI binding with USB-3.0 hub. Current ACPI only can bind one struct-device to one ACPI device node. This can not work with USB-3.0 hub, because the USB-3.0 hub has two logical devices. Each works for USB-2.0 and USB-3.0 devices. In the Linux USB subsystem, those two logical hubs are treated as two seperate devices that have two struct devices. But in the ACPI DSDT, these two logical hubs share one ACPI device node. So there is a requirement to bind multi struct-devices to one ACPI device node. This patch is to resolve such problem. Following is the ACPI device nodes' description under xhci hcd. Device (XHC) Device (RHUB) Device (HSP1) Device (HSP2) Device (HSP3) Device (HSP4) Device (SSP1) Device (SSP2) Device (SSP3) Device (SSP4) Topology in the Linux device XHC USB-2.0 logical hub USB-3.0 logical hub HSP1 SSP1 HSP2 SSP2 HSP3 SSP3 HSP4 SSP4 This patch also modifies the output of /proc/acpi/wakeup. One ACPI node can be associated with multiple devices: XHC S4 *enabled pci:0000:00:14.0 RHUB S0 disabled usb:usb1 disabled usb:usb2 Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-10-31acpi: add export.h to files using THIS_MODULE/EXPORT_SYMBOLPaul Gortmaker1-0/+1
These files were relying on module.h to come in via the path in an include/acpi header file, but we don't want to have instances of module.h being included from include/* files if it can be avoided. Have the files include export.h instead. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-01-07ACPI / PM: Use device wakeup flags for handling ACPI wakeup devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-6/+13
There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion devices. The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure. User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in the system's ACPI tables). To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of the special ACPI flags for handling those devices. In particular, use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states. Rework the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-07ACPI / PM: Do not enable multiple devices to wake up simultaneouslyRafael J. Wysocki1-25/+1
If a device is enabled to wake up the system from sleep states via /proc/acpi/wakeup and there are other devices associated with the same wakeup GPE, all of these devices are automatically enabled to wake up the system. This isn't correct, because the fact the GPE is shared need not imply that wakeup power has to be enabled for all the devices at the same time (i.e. it is possible that one device will have its wakeup power enabled and it will wake up the system from a sleep state if the shared wakeup GPE is enabled, while another device having its wakeup power disabled will not wake up the system even though the GPE is enabled). Rework acpi_system_write_wakeup_device() so that it only enables wakeup for one device at a time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-08-15ACPI: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/FZhang Rui1-70/+0
Rmove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F, including /proc/acpi/debug_layer /proc/acpi/debug_level /proc/acpi/info /proc/acpi/dsdt /proc/acpi/fadt /proc/acpi/sleep because the sysfs I/F is already available and has been working well for years. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-02-04Fix misspellings of "separate" in strings.Adam Buchbinder1-1/+1
Some string messages misspell "separate"; this fixes them. No change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-10-28ACPI: clean up video.c boundary checks and typesArjan van de Ven1-1/+1
proc.c and video.c are a bit sloppy around types and style, confusing gcc for a new feature that'll be in 2.6.33 and will cause a warning on the current code. This patch changes if (foo + 1 > sizeof bar) into if (foo >= sizeof(bar)) which is more kernel-style. it also changes a variable in proc.c to unsigned; it gets assigned a value from an unsigned type, and is then only compared for > not for negative, so using unsigned is just outright the right type Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-10-03ACPI: Fix bound checks for copy_from_user in the acpi /proc codeArjan van de Ven1-0/+2
The ACPI /proc write() code takes an unsigned length argument like any write() function, but then assigned it to a *signed* integer called "len". Only after this is a sanity check for len done to make it not larger than 4. Due to the type change a len < 0 is in principle also possible; this patch adds a check for this. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-07ACPI: convert acpi_device_lock spinlock to mutexShaohua Li1-9/+4
Convert acpi_device_lock to a mutex to avoid a potential race upon access to /proc/acpi/wakeup Delete the lock entirely in wakeup.c since it is not necessary (and can not sleep) Found-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-03-27ACPI: call acpi_sleep_proc_init() explicitly rather than as initcallBjorn Helgaas1-6/+1
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_sleep_proc_init() directly. Previously, acpi_sleep_proc_init() was a late_initcall (sequence 7), apparently to make sure that the /proc hierarchy already exists: 2003/02/13 12:38:03-06:00 mochel acpi sleep: demote sleep proc file creation. - Make acpi_sleep_proc_init() a late_initcall(), and not called from acpi_sleep_init(). This guarantees that the acpi proc hierarchy is at least there when we create the dang file. This should no longer be an issue because acpi_bus_init() (called early in acpi_init()) creates acpi_root_dir (/proc/acpi). Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-01-09Merge branch 'alarm' into releaseLen Brown1-21/+32
2009-01-09ACPICA: create acpica/ directoryLen Brown1-0/+520
also, delete sleep/ and delete ACPI_CFLAGS from Makefile Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>