| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of these files are:
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:menuconfig PMIC_OPREGION
drivers/acpi/Kconfig: bool "PMIC (Power Management Integrated Circuit) operation region support"
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:config BXT_WC_PMIC_OPREGION
drivers/acpi/Kconfig: bool "ACPI operation region support for BXT WhiskeyCove PMIC"
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:config XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION
drivers/acpi/Kconfig: bool "ACPI operation region support for XPower AXP288 PMIC"
...meaning they currently are not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that
when reading the code there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
We delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
One file was using module_init. Since module_init translates to
device_initcall in the non-modular case, the init ordering remains
unchanged with this commit.
In one case we replace the module.h with export.h since that file
is exporting some symbols, but does not use __init. The other two
are using __init and so module.h gets replaced with init.h there.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Fixes compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
At least some of the Broxtons have a third custom OpRegion
named REGS. This adds handling for it.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
This patch adds operation region driver for Intel BXT WhiskeyCove
PMIC. The register mapping is done as per the BXT WC data sheet.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Issue description: On some pmics, the policy enable for thermal alerts
refers to different bit fields of the same registers, whereas on other
pmics, the policy enable refers to the same bit field on different
registers. Previous implementation did not provide the flexibility for
supporting the first approach.
Solution: Modified the policy enable function to take bit field as well.
The use of bit field is left to the pmic specific opregion driver.
Signed-off-by: Yegnesh Iyer <yegnesh.s.iyer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:config CRC_PMIC_OPREGION
drivers/acpi/Kconfig: bool "ACPI operation region support for CrystalCove PMIC"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple modular references, so that when reading
the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit.
We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
This patch fix a spelling typo in MODULE_DESCRIPTION within intel_pmic_crc.c
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The LPAT table processing functions from this modules are moved to a
standalone module with exported interface functions.
Using new interface functions in this module.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
|
The same virtual GPIO strategy is also used for the AXP288 PMIC in that
various control methods that are used to do power rail handling and
sensor reading/setting will touch GPIO fields defined under the PMIC
device. The GPIO fileds are only defined by the ACPI code while the
actual hardware doesn't really have a GPIO controller, but to make those
control method execution succeed, we have to install a GPIO handler for
the PMIC device handle. Since we do not need the virtual GPIO strategy,
we can simply do nothing in that handler.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The Baytrail-T-CR platform firmware has defined two customized operation
regions for PMIC chip Dollar Cove XPower - one is for power resource
handling and one is for thermal just like the CrystalCove one. This patch
adds support for them on top of the common PMIC opregion region code.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The Baytrail-T platform firmware has defined two customized operation
regions for PMIC chip Crystal Cove - one is for power resource handling
and one is for thermal: sensor temperature reporting, trip point setting,
etc. This patch adds support for them on top of the existing Crystal Cove
PMIC driver.
The reason to split code into a separate file intel_pmic.c is that there
are more PMIC drivers with ACPI operation region support coming and we can
re-use those code. The intel_pmic_opregion_data structure is created also
for this purpose: when we need to support a new PMIC's operation region,
we just need to fill those callbacks and the two register mapping tables.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
