summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/pmic
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-03-09drivers/acpi: make pmic/intel_pmic_crc.c explicitly non-modularPaul Gortmaker1-5/+2
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/acpi/Kconfig:config CRC_PMIC_OPREGION drivers/acpi/Kconfig: bool "ACPI operation region support for CrystalCove PMIC" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple modular references, so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit. We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information is already contained at the top of the file in the comments. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-03-26ACPI/PMIC: Fix typo in MODULE_DESCRIPTION in intel_pmic_crc.cMasanari Iida1-1/+1
This patch fix a spelling typo in MODULE_DESCRIPTION within intel_pmic_crc.c Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-01-29ACPI / PMIC: Use common LPAT table handling functionsSrinivas Pandruvada1-115/+18
The LPAT table processing functions from this modules are moved to a standalone module with exported interface functions. Using new interface functions in this module. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
2014-11-26ACPI / PMIC: AXP288: support virtual GPIO in ACPI tableAaron Lu1-4/+26
The same virtual GPIO strategy is also used for the AXP288 PMIC in that various control methods that are used to do power rail handling and sensor reading/setting will touch GPIO fields defined under the PMIC device. The GPIO fileds are only defined by the ACPI code while the actual hardware doesn't really have a GPIO controller, but to make those control method execution succeed, we have to install a GPIO handler for the PMIC device handle. Since we do not need the virtual GPIO strategy, we can simply do nothing in that handler. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-26ACPI / PMIC: support PMIC operation region for XPower AXP288Aaron Lu1-0/+246
The Baytrail-T-CR platform firmware has defined two customized operation regions for PMIC chip Dollar Cove XPower - one is for power resource handling and one is for thermal just like the CrystalCove one. This patch adds support for them on top of the common PMIC opregion region code. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-26ACPI / PMIC: support PMIC operation region for CrystalCoveAaron Lu3-0/+590
The Baytrail-T platform firmware has defined two customized operation regions for PMIC chip Crystal Cove - one is for power resource handling and one is for thermal: sensor temperature reporting, trip point setting, etc. This patch adds support for them on top of the existing Crystal Cove PMIC driver. The reason to split code into a separate file intel_pmic.c is that there are more PMIC drivers with ACPI operation region support coming and we can re-use those code. The intel_pmic_opregion_data structure is created also for this purpose: when we need to support a new PMIC's operation region, we just need to fill those callbacks and the two register mapping tables. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>