| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
There are no remaining callers of set_fs(), so CONFIG_SET_FS
can be removed globally, along with the thread_info field and
any references to it.
This turns access_ok() into a cheaper check against TASK_SIZE_MAX.
As CONFIG_SET_FS is now gone, drop all remaining references to
set_fs()/get_fs(), mm_segment_t, user_addr_max() and uaccess_kernel().
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> # for sparc32 changes
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Tested-by: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@synopsys.com> # for arc changes
Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> # [openrisc, asm-generic]
Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
of uaccess_kernel() sections.
For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.
Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across
architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline
function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of
callers need an extra __user annotation for this.
Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the
addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses
fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the
end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic]
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.
Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Remove the csky implemenation of strncpy/strnlen and instead use the
generic versions. The csky version is fairly slow because it always does
byte accesses even for aligned data, and it lacks a checks for
user_addr_max().
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
This is a preparation for changing over architectures to the
generic implementation one at a time. As there are no callers
of either __strncpy_from_user() or __strnlen_user(), fold these
into the strncpy_from_user() and strnlen_user() functions to make
each implementation independent of the others.
Many of these implementations have known bugs, but the intention
here is to not change behavior at all and stay compatible with
those bugs for the moment.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Using asm-generic/uaccess.h to prevent duplicated code:
- Add user_addr_max which mentioned in generic uaccess.h
- Remove custom definitions of KERNEL/USER_DS, get/set_fs,
uaccess_kerenl
- Using generic extable.h instead of custom definitions in
uaccess.h
Change v2:
- Fixup tinyconfig compile error, "__put_user_bad"
- Add __get_user_asm_64
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/CAK8P3a1DvsXSEDoovLk11hzNHyJi7vqNoToU+n5aFi2viZO_Uw@mail.gmail.com/T/#mbcd58a0e3450e5598974116b607589afa16a3ab7
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
: error: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90
// Copyright (C) 2018 Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems co.,ltd.
^
error: (this will be reported only once per input file)
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
|
|
If raw_copy_from_user(to, from, N) returns K, callers expect
the first N - K bytes starting at to to have been replaced with
the contents of corresponding area starting at from and the last
K bytes of destination *left* *unmodified*.
What arch/sky/lib/usercopy.c is doing is broken - it can lead to e.g.
data corruption on write(2).
raw_copy_to_user() is inaccurate about return value, which is a bug,
but consequences are less drastic than for raw_copy_from_user().
And just what are those access_ok() doing in there? I mean, look into
linux/uaccess.h; that's where we do that check (as well as zero tail
on failure in the callers that need zeroing).
AFAICS, all of that shouldn't be hard to fix; something like a patch
below might make a useful starting point.
I would suggest moving these macros into usercopy.c (they are never
used anywhere else) and possibly expanding them there; if you leave
them alive, please at least rename __copy_user_zeroing(). Again,
it must not zero anything on failed read.
Said that, I'm not sure we won't be better off simply turning
usercopy.c into usercopy.S - all that is left there is a couple of
functions, each consisting only of inline asm.
Guo Ren reply:
Yes, raw_copy_from_user is wrong, it's no need zeroing code.
unsigned long _copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
unsigned long res = n;
might_fault();
if (likely(access_ok(from, n))) {
kasan_check_write(to, n);
res = raw_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
}
if (unlikely(res))
memset(to + (n - res), 0, res);
return res;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_from_user);
You are right and access_ok() should be removed.
but, how about:
do {
...
"2: stw %3, (%1, 0) \n" \
+ " subi %0, 4 \n" \
"9: stw %4, (%1, 4) \n" \
+ " subi %0, 4 \n" \
"10: stw %5, (%1, 8) \n" \
+ " subi %0, 4 \n" \
"11: stw %6, (%1, 12) \n" \
+ " subi %0, 4 \n" \
" addi %2, 16 \n" \
" addi %1, 16 \n" \
Don't expand __ex_table
AI Viro reply:
Hey, I've no idea about the instruction scheduling on csky -
if that doesn't slow the things down, all the better. It's just
that copy_to_user() and friends are on fairly hot codepaths,
and in quite a few situations they will dominate the speed of
e.g. read(2). So I tried to keep the fast path unchanged.
Up to the architecture maintainers, obviously. Which would be
you...
As for the fixups size increase (__ex_table size is unchanged)...
You have each of those macros expanded exactly once.
So the size is not a serious argument, IMO - useless complexity
would be, if it is, in fact, useless; the size... not really,
especially since those extra subi will at least offset it.
Again, up to you - asm optimizations of (essentially)
memcpy()-style loops are tricky and can depend upon the
fairly subtle details of architecture. So even on something
I know reasonably well I would resort to direct experiments
if I can't pass the buck to architecture maintainers.
It *is* worth optimizing - this is where read() from a file
that is already in page cache spends most of the time, etc.
Guo Ren reply:
Thx, after fixup some typo “sub %0, 4”, apply the patch.
TODO:
- user copy/from codes are still need optimizing.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
|
|
The defconfig compiles without linux/mm.h. With mm.h included the
include chain leands to:
| CC kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.o
| In file included from include/linux/huge_mm.h:8,
| from include/linux/mm.h:567,
| from arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h:,
| from include/linux/uaccess.h:11,
| from include/linux/sched/task.h:11,
| from include/linux/sched/signal.h:9,
| from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6,
| from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:8,
| from kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:6:
| include/linux/fs.h:1422:29: error: array type has incomplete element type 'struct percpu_rw_semaphore'
| 1422 | struct percpu_rw_semaphore rw_sem[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
once rcuwait.h includes linux/sched/signal.h.
Remove the linux/mm.h include.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113241.434999165@linutronix.de
|
|
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument
of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the
old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand.
It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect
bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any
user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these
days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact.
A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range
checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to
move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at
the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's
just get this done once and for all.
This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for
the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form.
There were a couple of notable cases:
- csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias.
- the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual
values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing
really used it)
- microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout
but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch.
I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for
access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed
something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The patch adds "user access from kernel" codes.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
