summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/net
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-09-29bpf, arm: Fix register clobbering in div/mod implementationJohan Almbladh1-0/+19
On ARM CPUs that lack div/mod instructions, ALU32 BPF_DIV and BPF_MOD are implemented using a call to a helper function. Before, the emitted code for those function calls failed to preserve caller-saved ARM registers. Since some of those registers happen to be mapped to BPF registers, it resulted in eBPF register values being overwritten. This patch emits code to push and pop the remaining caller-saved ARM registers r2-r3 into the stack during the div/mod function call. ARM registers r0-r1 are used as arguments and return value, and those were already saved and restored correctly. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2021-07-29bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4Daniel Borkmann1-0/+3
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction /either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to /no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already. This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence' instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled, it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4 since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs. The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers. Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-01-14bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .immBrendan Jackman1-4/+3
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2020-05-04bpf, arm: Optimize ALU ARSH K using asr immediate instructionLuke Nelson2-3/+10
This patch adds an optimization that uses the asr immediate instruction for BPF_ALU BPF_ARSH BPF_K, rather than loading the immediate to a temporary register. This is similar to existing code for handling BPF_ALU BPF_{LSH,RSH} BPF_K. This optimization saves two instructions and is more consistent with LSH and RSH. Example of the code generated for BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5) before the optimization: 2c: mov r8, #5 30: mov r9, #0 34: asr r0, r0, r8 and after optimization: 2c: asr r0, r0, #5 Tested on QEMU using lib/test_bpf and test_verifier. Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200501020210.32294-3-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
2020-05-04bpf, arm: Optimize ALU64 ARSH X using orrpl conditional instructionLuke Nelson1-2/+2
This patch optimizes the code generated by emit_a32_arsh_r64, which handles the BPF_ALU64 BPF_ARSH BPF_X instruction. The original code uses a conditional B followed by an unconditional ORR. The optimization saves one instruction by removing the B instruction and using a conditional ORR (with an inverted condition). Example of the code generated for BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), before optimization: 34: rsb ip, r2, #32 38: subs r9, r2, #32 3c: lsr lr, r0, r2 40: orr lr, lr, r1, lsl ip 44: bmi 0x4c 48: orr lr, lr, r1, asr r9 4c: asr ip, r1, r2 50: mov r0, lr 54: mov r1, ip and after optimization: 34: rsb ip, r2, #32 38: subs r9, r2, #32 3c: lsr lr, r0, r2 40: orr lr, lr, r1, lsl ip 44: orrpl lr, lr, r1, asr r9 48: asr ip, r1, r2 4c: mov r0, lr 50: mov r1, ip Tested on QEMU using lib/test_bpf and test_verifier. Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200501020210.32294-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
2020-04-14arm, bpf: Fix offset overflow for BPF_MEM BPF_DWLuke Nelson1-16/+24
This patch fixes an incorrect check in how immediate memory offsets are computed for BPF_DW on arm. For BPF_LDX/ST/STX + BPF_DW, the 32-bit arm JIT breaks down an 8-byte access into two separate 4-byte accesses using off+0 and off+4. If off fits in imm12, the JIT emits a ldr/str instruction with the immediate and avoids the use of a temporary register. While the current check off <= 0xfff ensures that the first immediate off+0 doesn't overflow imm12, it's not sufficient for the second immediate off+4, which may cause the second access of BPF_DW to read/write the wrong address. This patch fixes the problem by changing the check to off <= 0xfff - 4 for BPF_DW, ensuring off+4 will never overflow. A side effect of simplifying the check is that it now allows using negative immediate offsets in ldr/str. This means that small negative offsets can also avoid the use of a temporary register. This patch introduces no new failures in test_verifier or test_bpf.c. Fixes: c5eae692571d6 ("ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit store implementation") Fixes: ec19e02b343db ("ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructions") Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200409221752.28448-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
2020-04-09arm, bpf: Fix bugs with ALU64 {RSH, ARSH} BPF_K shift by 0Luke Nelson1-2/+10
The current arm BPF JIT does not correctly compile RSH or ARSH when the immediate shift amount is 0. This causes the "rsh64 by 0 imm" and "arsh64 by 0 imm" BPF selftests to hang the kernel by reaching an instruction the verifier determines to be unreachable. The root cause is in how immediate right shifts are encoded on arm. For LSR and ASR (logical and arithmetic right shift), a bit-pattern of 00000 in the immediate encodes a shift amount of 32. When the BPF immediate is 0, the generated code shifts by 32 instead of the expected behavior (a no-op). This patch fixes the bugs by adding an additional check if the BPF immediate is 0. After the change, the above mentioned BPF selftests pass. Fixes: 39c13c204bb11 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200408181229.10909-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
2019-12-11ARM: net: bpf: Improve prologue code sequenceRussell King1-17/+13
Improve the prologue code sequence to be able to take advantage of 64-bit stores, changing the code from: push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, fp, lr} mov fp, sp sub ip, sp, #80 ; 0x50 sub sp, sp, #600 ; 0x258 str ip, [fp, #-100] ; 0xffffff9c mov r6, #0 str r6, [fp, #-96] ; 0xffffffa0 mov r4, #0 mov r3, r4 mov r2, r0 str r4, [fp, #-104] ; 0xffffff98 str r4, [fp, #-108] ; 0xffffff94 to the tighter: push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, fp, lr} mov fp, sp mov r3, #0 sub r2, sp, #80 ; 0x50 sub sp, sp, #600 ; 0x258 strd r2, [fp, #-100] ; 0xffffff9c mov r2, #0 strd r2, [fp, #-108] ; 0xffffff94 mov r2, r0 resulting in a saving of three instructions. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/E1ieH2g-0004ih-Rb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk
2019-06-17Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller2-8/+2
Honestly all the conflicts were simple overlapping changes, nothing really interesting to report. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441Thomas Gleixner2-8/+2
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-24arm: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-genJiong Wang1-11/+31
Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-05-21treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/KconfigThomas Gleixner1-0/+1
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which: - Have no license information of any form These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-01-26arm: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32Jiong Wang2-9/+46
This patch implements code-gen for new JMP32 instructions on arm. For JSET, "ands" (AND with flags updated) is used, so corresponding encoding helper is added. Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-13ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit ALU implementationRussell King1-5/+24
Improbe the 64-bit ALU implementation from: movw r8, #65532 movt r8, #65535 movw r9, #65535 movt r9, #65535 ldr r7, [fp, #-44] adds r7, r7, r8 str r7, [fp, #-44] ldr r7, [fp, #-40] adc r7, r7, r9 str r7, [fp, #-40] to: movw r8, #65532 movt r8, #65535 movw r9, #65535 movt r9, #65535 ldrd r6, [fp, #-44] adds r6, r6, r8 adc r7, r7, r9 strd r6, [fp, #-44] Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-13ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit store implementationRussell King1-26/+26
Improve the 64-bit store implementation from: ldr r6, [fp, #-8] str r8, [r6] ldr r6, [fp, #-8] mov r7, #4 add r7, r6, r7 str r9, [r7] to: ldr r6, [fp, #-8] str r8, [r6] str r9, [r6, #4] We leave the store as two separate STR instructions rather than using STRD as the store may not be aligned, and STR can handle misalignment. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-13ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit sign-extended immediate loadRussell King1-4/+3
Improve the 64-bit sign-extended immediate from: mov r6, #1 str r6, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc mov r6, #0 str r6, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0 to: mov r6, #1 mov r7, #0 strd r6, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-13ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit load immediate implementationRussell King1-12/+20
Rather than writing each 32-bit half of the 64-bit immediate value separately when the register is on the stack: movw r6, #45056 ; 0xb000 movt r6, #60979 ; 0xee33 str r6, [fp, #-44] ; 0xffffffd4 mov r6, #0 str r6, [fp, #-40] ; 0xffffffd8 arrange to use the double-word store when available instead: movw r6, #45056 ; 0xb000 movt r6, #60979 ; 0xee33 mov r7, #0 strd r6, [fp, #-44] ; 0xffffffd4 Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: use double-word load/stores where availableRussell King2-12/+45
Use double-word load and stores where support for this instruction is supported by the CPU architecture. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: always use odd/even register pairRussell King1-14/+14
Always use an odd/even register pair for our 64-bit registers, so that we're able to use the double-word load/store instructions in the future. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: avoid reloading 'array'Russell King1-5/+4
Rearranging the order of the initial tail call code a little allows is to avoid reloading the 'array' pointer. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: avoid reloading 'index'Russell King1-2/+3
Avoid reloading 'index' after we have validated it - it remains in tmp2[1] up to the point that we begin the code to index the pointer array, so with a little rearrangement of the registers, we can use the already loaded value. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: use ldr instructions with shifted rm registerRussell King2-2/+5
Rather than pre-shifting the rm register for the ldr in the tail call, shift it in the load instruction. This eliminates one unnecessary instruction. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: use immediate forms of instructions where possibleRussell King2-9/+13
Rather than moving constants to a register and then using them in a subsequent instruction, use them directly in the desired instruction cutting out the "middle" register. This removes two instructions from the tail call code path. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: imm12 constant conversionRussell King1-1/+49
Provide a version of the imm8m() function that the compiler can optimise when used with a constant expression. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: access eBPF scratch space using ARM FP registerRussell King1-19/+25
Access the eBPF scratch space using the frame pointer rather than our stack pointer, as the offsets from the ARM frame pointer are constant across all eBPF programs. Since we no longer reference the scratch space registers from the stack pointer, this simplifies emit_push_r64() as it no longer needs to know how many words are pushed onto the stack. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: 64-bit accessor functions for BPF registersRussell King1-113/+122
Provide a couple of 64-bit register accessors, and use them where appropriate Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: provide accessor functions for BPF registersRussell King1-201/+128
Many of the code paths need to have knowledge about whether a register is stacked or in a CPU register. Move this decision making to a pair of helper functions instead of having it scattered throughout the code. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: remove is_on_stack() and sstk/dstkRussell King1-176/+160
The decision about whether a BPF register is on the stack or in a CPU register is detected at the top BPF insn processing level, and then percolated throughout the remainder of the code. Since we now use negative register values to represent stacked registers, we can detect where a BPF register is stored without restoring to carrying this additional metadata through all code paths. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: use negative numbers for stacked registersRussell King1-98/+102
Use negative numbers for eBPF registers that live on the stack. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: provide load/store ops with negative immediatesRussell King2-22/+41
Provide a set of load/store opcode generators that work with negative immediates as well as positive ones. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-12ARM: net: bpf: enumerate the JIT scratch stack layoutRussell King1-17/+42
Enumerate the contents of the JIT scratch stack layout used for storing some of the JITs 64-bit registers, tail call counter and AX register. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-06-29bpf, arm32: fix to use bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro apiDaniel Borkmann1-1/+1
Any eBPF JIT that where its underlying arch supports ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY would need to use bpf_jit_binary_{un,}lock_ro() pair instead of the set_memory_{ro,rw}() pair directly as otherwise changes to the former might break. arm32's eBPF conversion missed to change it, so fix this up here. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-06-05bpf, arm32: fix inconsistent naming about emit_a32_lsr_{r64,i64}Wang YanQing1-5/+5
The names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH are emit_a32_arsh_*, the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH are emit_a32_lsh_*, but the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH are emit_a32_lsr_*. For consistence reason, let's rename emit_a32_lsr_* to emit_a32_rsh_*. This patch also corrects a wrong comment. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-06-05bpf, arm32: correct check_imm24Wang YanQing1-3/+3
imm24 is signed, so the right range is: [-(1<<(24 - 1)), (1<<(24 - 1)) - 1] Note: this patch also fix a typo. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-05-14bpf, arm32: save 4 bytes of unneeded stack spaceDaniel Borkmann1-10/+3
The extra skb_copy_bits() buffer is not used anymore, therefore remove the extra 4 byte stack space requirement. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-03bpf, arm32: remove ld_abs/ld_indDaniel Borkmann1-77/+0
Since LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions are now removed from the core and reimplemented through a combination of inlined BPF instructions and a slow-path helper, we can get rid of the complexity from arm32 JIT. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-26bpf, arm: remove obsolete exception handling from div/modDaniel Borkmann1-8/+0
Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from arm32 JIT. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-20Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller1-2/+0
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2018-01-19 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. The main changes are: 1) bpf array map HW offload, from Jakub. 2) support for bpf_get_next_key() for LPM map, from Yonghong. 3) test_verifier now runs loaded programs, from Alexei. 4) xdp cpumap monitoring, from Jesper. 5) variety of tests, cleanups and small x64 JIT optimization, from Daniel. 6) user space can now retrieve HW JITed program, from Jiong. Note there is a minor conflict between Russell's arm32 JIT fixes and removal of bpf_jit_enable variable by Daniel which should be resolved by keeping Russell's comment and removing that variable. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-19Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller1-114/+111
The BPF verifier conflict was some minor contextual issue. The TUN conflict was less trivial. Cong Wang fixed a memory leak of tfile->tx_array in 'net'. This is an skb_array. But meanwhile in net-next tun changed tfile->tx_arry into tfile->tx_ring which is a ptr_ring. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-19bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jitsDaniel Borkmann1-2/+0
Having a pure_initcall() callback just to permanently enable BPF JITs under CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is unnecessary and could leave a small race window in future where JIT is still disabled on boot. Since we know about the setting at compilation time anyway, just initialize it properly there. Also consolidate all the individual bpf_jit_enable variables into a single one and move them under one location. Moreover, don't allow for setting unspecified garbage values on them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: clarify tail_call indexRussell King1-1/+1
As per 90caccdd8cc0 ("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT"), the index used for array lookup is defined to be 32-bit wide. Update a misleading comment that suggests it is 64-bit wide. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructionsRussell King1-28/+33
When the source and destination register are identical, our JIT does not generate correct code, which leads to kernel oopses. Fix this by (a) generating more efficient code, and (b) making use of the temporary earlier if we will overwrite the address register. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: fix register savingRussell King1-58/+22
When an eBPF program tail-calls another eBPF program, it enters it after the prologue to avoid having complex stack manipulations. This can lead to kernel oopses, and similar. Resolve this by always using a fixed stack layout, a CPU register frame pointer, and using this when reloading registers before returning. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: correct stack layout documentationRussell King1-8/+27
The stack layout documentation incorrectly suggests that the BPF JIT scratch space starts immediately below BPF_FP. This is not correct, so let's fix the documentation to reflect reality. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: move stack documentationRussell King1-21/+21
Move the stack documentation towards the top of the file, where it's relevant for things like the register layout. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: fix stack alignmentRussell King1-3/+8
As per 2dede2d8e925 ("ARM EABI: stack pointer must be 64-bit aligned after a CPU exception") the stack should be aligned to a 64-bit boundary on EABI systems. Ensure that the eBPF JIT appropraitely aligns the stack. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: fix tail call jumpsRussell King1-1/+1
When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, #588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, #524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, #528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, #32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, #524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, #528] 1b0: mov r6, #104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, #588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, #32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, #44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, #596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-01-17ARM: net: bpf: avoid 'bx' instruction on non-Thumb capable CPUsRussell King1-7/+11
Avoid the 'bx' instruction on CPUs that have no support for Thumb and thus do not implement this instruction by moving the generation of this opcode to a separate function that selects between: bx reg and mov pc, reg according to the capabilities of the CPU. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-12-17bpf: fix net.core.bpf_jit_enable raceAlexei Starovoitov1-1/+1
global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs, blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid this race condition. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-08-22arm: eBPF JIT compilerShubham Bansal2-810/+1746
The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF core. This patch is essentially changing the current implementation of JIT compiler of Berkeley Packet Filter from classic to internal with almost all instructions from eBPF ISA supported except the following BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW Implementation is using scratch space to emulate 64 bit eBPF ISA on 32 bit ARM because of deficiency of general purpose registers on ARM. Currently, only LITTLE ENDIAN machines are supported in this eBPF JIT Compiler. Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal). Testing results on ARMv7: 1) test_bpf: Summary: 341 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [312/333 JIT'ed] 2) test_tag: OK (40945 tests) 3) test_progs: Summary: 30 PASSED, 0 FAILED 4) test_lpm: OK 5) test_lru_map: OK Above tests are all done with following flags enabled discreatly. 1) bpf_jit_enable=1 a) CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER enabled b) CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER disabled 2) bpf_jit_enable=1 and bpf_jit_harden=2 a) CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER enabled b) CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER disabled See Documentation/networking/filter.txt for more information. Signed-off-by: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-09 08:21:40 +0000