summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/kernel/signal.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-10-31ARM: 8920/1: share get_signal_page from signal.c to process.cBen Dooks (Codethink)1-0/+2
The get_signal_page() function is defined in signal.c and used in process.c but there is no shared definition. Add one in signal.h to silence the following warning: arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:683:13: warning: symbol 'get_signal_page' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-09-10ARM: signal handling support for FDPIC_FUNCPTRS functionsNicolas Pitre1-0/+11
Signal handlers are not direct function pointers but pointers to function descriptor in that case. Therefore we must retrieve the actual function address and load the GOT value into r9 from the descriptor before branching to the actual handler. If a restorer is provided, we also have to load its address and GOT from its descriptor. That descriptor address and the code to load it is pushed onto the stack to be executed as soon as the signal handler returns. However, to be compatible with NX stacks, the FDPIC bounce code is also copied to the signal page along with the other code stubs. Therefore this code must get at the descriptor address whether it executes from the stack or the signal page. To do so we use the stack pointer which points at the signal stack frame where the descriptor address was stored. Because the rt signal frame is different from the simpler frame, two versions of the bounce code are needed, and two variants (ARM and Thumb) as well. The asm-offsets facility is used to determine the actual offset in the signal frame for each version, meaning that struct sigframe and rt_sigframe had to be moved to a separate file. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mickael GUENE <mickael.guene@st.com> Tested-by: Vincent Abriou <vincent.abriou@st.com> Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <szemzo.andras@gmail.com>
2013-08-01ARM: move signal handlers into a vdso-like pageRussell King1-12/+0
Move the signal handlers into a VDSO page rather than keeping them in the vectors page. This allows us to place them randomly within this page, and also map the page at a random location within userspace further protecting these code fragments from ROP attacks. The new VDSO page is also poisoned in the same way as the vector page. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-07-28ARM: 7471/1: Revert "7442/1: Revert "remove unused restart trampoline""Will Deacon1-2/+0
This reverts commit 3b0c06226783ffc836217eb34f7eca311b1e63f7. We no longer require the restart trampoline for syscall restarting. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-07-05ARM: 7442/1: Revert "remove unused restart trampoline"Will Deacon1-0/+2
This reverts commit fa18484d0947b976a769d15c83c50617493c81c1. We need the restart trampoline back so that we can revert a related problematic patch 6b5c8045ecc7e726cdaa2a9d9c8e5008050e1252 ("arm: new way of handling ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK"). Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-05-21arm: remove unused restart trampolineAl Viro1-2/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-10-25ARM: Fix signal restart issues with NX and OABI compatRussell King1-1/+3
The signal restarting code was placed on the user stack when OABI compatibility is enabled. Unfortunately, with an EABI NX executable, this results in an attempt to run code from the non-executable stack, which segfaults the application. Fix this by placing the code in the vectors page, along side the signal return code, and directing the application to that code. Reported-by: saeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com> Tested-by: saeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-27[ARM] nommu: fixups for the exception vectorsHyok S. Choi1-1/+1
The high page vector (0xFFFF0000) does not supported in nommu mode. This patch allows the vectors to be 0x00000000 or the begining of DRAM in nommu mode. Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-01-18[ARM] 3270/1: ARM EABI: fix sigreturn and rt_sigreturnNicolas Pitre1-1/+1
Patch from Nicolas Pitre The signal return path consists of user code provided by the kernel. Since a syscall is used, it has to be updated to work with EABI. Noticed by Daniel Jacobowitz. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-22[PATCH] ARM: Move signal return code into vector pageRussell King1-0/+12
Move the signal return code into the vector page instead of placing it on the user mode stack, which will allow us to avoid flushing the instruction cache on signals, as well as eventually allowing non-exec stack. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>