summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-06-09Btrfs: send, don't error in the presence of subvols/snapshotsFilipe Manana1-0/+4
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a root, which doesn't exist. Steps to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt mkdir /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 rmdir /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data A test case for xfstests follows. Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: async delayed refsChris Mason5-3/+107
Delayed extent operations are triggered during transaction commits. The goal is to queue up a healthly batch of changes to the extent allocation tree and run through them in bulk. This farms them off to async helper threads. The goal is to have the bulk of the delayed operations being done in the background, but this is also important to limit our stack footprint. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: split up __extent_writepage to lower stack usageChris Mason2-138/+194
__extent_writepage has two unrelated parts. First it does the delayed allocation dance and second it does the mapping and IO for the page we're actually writing. This splits it up into those two parts so the stack from one doesn't impact the stack from the other. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: Drop EXTENT_UPTODATE check in hole punching and direct lockingAlex Gartrell3-7/+71
In these instances, we are trying to determine if a page has been accessed since we began the operation for the sake of retry. This is easily accomplished by doing a gang lookup in the page mapping radix tree, and it saves us the dependency on the flag (so that we might eventually delete it). btrfs_page_exists_in_range borrows heavily from find_get_page, replacing the radix tree look up with a gang lookup of 1, so that we can find the next highest page >= index and see if it falls into our lock range. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: cut down stack usage in btree_write_cache_pagesChris Mason1-4/+5
This adds noinline_for_stack to two helpers used by btree_write_cache_pages. It shaves us down from 424 bytes on the stack to 280. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: break up __btrfs_write_out_cache to cut down stack usageChris Mason1-117/+191
__btrfs_write_out_cache was one of our stack pigs. This breaks it up into helper functions and slims it down to 194 bytes. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: free tmp ulist for qgroup rescanJosef Bacik1-0/+1
Memory leaks are bad mmkay? Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: usage error should not be logged into system logAnand Jain1-4/+1
I have an opinion that system logs /var/log/messages are valuable info to investigate the real system issues at the data center. People handling data center issues do spend a lot time and efforts analyzing messages files. Having usage error logged into /var/log/messages is something we should avoid. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: remove newline from inode cache kthread nameDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: remove stale newlines from log messagesDavid Sterba7-14/+14
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix double free in find_lock_delalloc_rangeChris Mason1-0/+1
We need to NULL the cached_state after freeing it, otherwise we might free it again if find_delalloc_range doesn't find anything. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2014-06-09btrfs: replace simple_strtoull() with kstrtoull()ZhangZhen1-2/+3
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoull() to replace simple_strtoull(), because simple_strtoull() is marked for obsoletion. Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: set right total device count for seeding supportWang Shilong1-1/+0
Seeding device support allows us to create a new filesystem based on existed filesystem. However newly created filesystem's @total_devices should include seed devices. This patch fix the following problem: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb # btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb # mount /dev/sdb /mnt # btrfs device add -f /dev/sdc /mnt --->fs_devices->total_devices = 1 # umount /mnt # mount /dev/sdc /mnt --->fs_devices->total_devices = 2 This is because we record right @total_devices in superblock, but @fs_devices->total_devices is reset to be 0 in btrfs_prepare_sprout(). Fix this problem by not resetting @fs_devices->total_devices. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: remove OPT_acl parse when acl disabledGuangliang Zhao1-0/+7
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not built, so the mount options will appear to be supported but will be silently ignored. Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao <lucienchao@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting codeJosef Bacik16-37/+700
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself, hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: rework qgroup accountingJosef Bacik12-479/+1044
Currently qgroups account for space by intercepting delayed ref updates to fs trees. It does this by adding sequence numbers to delayed ref updates so that it can figure out how the tree looked before the update so we can adjust the counters properly. The problem with this is that it does not allow delayed refs to be merged, so if you say are defragging an extent with 5k snapshots pointing to it we will thrash the delayed ref lock because we need to go back and manually merge these things together. Instead we want to process quota changes when we know they are going to happen, like when we first allocate an extent, we free a reference for an extent, we add new references etc. This patch accomplishes this by only adding qgroup operations for real ref changes. We only modify the sequence number when we need to lookup roots for bytenrs, this reduces the amount of churn on the sequence number and allows us to merge delayed refs as we add them most of the time. This patch encompasses a bunch of architectural changes 1) qgroup ref operations: instead of tracking qgroup operations through the delayed refs we simply add new ref operations whenever we notice that we need to when we've modified the refs themselves. 2) tree mod seq: we no longer have this separation of major/minor counters. this makes the sequence number stuff much more sane and we can remove some locking that was needed to protect the counter. 3) delayed ref seq: we now read the tree mod seq number and use that as our sequence. This means each new delayed ref doesn't have it's own unique sequence number, rather whenever we go to lookup backrefs we inc the sequence number so we can make sure to keep any new operations from screwing up our world view at that given point. This allows us to merge delayed refs during runtime. With all of these changes the delayed ref stuff is a little saner and the qgroup accounting stuff no longer goes negative in some cases like it was before. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: mark mapping with error flag to report errors to userspaceLiu Bo1-0/+2
According to commit 865ffef3797da2cac85b3354b5b6050dc9660978 (fs: fix fsync() error reporting), it's not stable to just check error pages because pages can be truncated or invalidated, we should also mark mapping with error flag so that a later fsync can catch the error. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix NULL pointer crash of deleting a seed deviceLiu Bo1-4/+8
Same as normal devices, seed devices should be initialized with fs_info->dev_root as well, otherwise we'll get a NULL pointer crash. Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix joining same transaction handle more than twiceWang Shilong1-2/+9
We hit something like the following function call flows: |->run_delalloc_range() |->btrfs_join_transaction() |->cow_file_range() |->btrfs_join_transaction() |->find_free_extent() |->btrfs_join_transaction() Trace infomation can be seen as: [ 7411.127040] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 7411.127060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11557 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:383 start_transaction+0x561/0x580 [btrfs]() [ 7411.127079] CPU: 0 PID: 11557 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G O 3.13.0+ #4 [ 7411.127080] Hardware name: LENOVO QiTianM4350/ , BIOS F1KT52AUS 05/24/2013 [ 7411.127085] Workqueue: writeback bdi_writeback_workfn (flush-btrfs-5) [ 7411.127092] Call Trace: [ 7411.127097] [<ffffffff815b87b0>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 7411.127101] [<ffffffff81051ffd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0 [ 7411.127102] [<ffffffff810520da>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 7411.127109] [<ffffffffa0444fb1>] start_transaction+0x561/0x580 [btrfs] [ 7411.127115] [<ffffffffa0445027>] btrfs_join_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [ 7411.127120] [<ffffffffa0431c91>] find_free_extent+0xa21/0xb50 [btrfs] [ 7411.127126] [<ffffffffa0431f68>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xa8/0x1a0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127131] [<ffffffffa04322ce>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xee/0x440 [btrfs] [ 7411.127137] [<ffffffffa043bd6e>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [ 7411.127142] [<ffffffffa041da51>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x121/0x530 [btrfs] [ 7411.127146] [<ffffffffa041dfff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127151] [<ffffffffa0421b74>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1d4/0x9c0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127157] [<ffffffffa0438567>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs] [ 7411.127163] [<ffffffffa0456bfc>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x16c/0xd90 [btrfs] [ 7411.127169] [<ffffffffa0444ae3>] ? start_transaction+0x93/0x580 [btrfs] [ 7411.127171] [<ffffffff811663e2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x132/0x140 [ 7411.127176] [<ffffffffa041cd9a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [ 7411.127182] [<ffffffffa044aa61>] cow_file_range_inline+0x181/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127187] [<ffffffffa044aead>] cow_file_range+0x2ed/0x440 [btrfs] [ 7411.127194] [<ffffffffa0464d7f>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127200] [<ffffffffa044b38f>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x38f/0xa60 [btrfs] [ 7411.127207] [<ffffffffa0461600>] ? test_range_bit+0x30/0x180 [btrfs] [ 7411.127212] [<ffffffffa044bd48>] run_delalloc_range+0x2e8/0x350 [btrfs] [ 7411.127219] [<ffffffffa04618f9>] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x1a9/0x1e0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127222] [<ffffffff812a1e71>] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2c1/0x330 [ 7411.127228] [<ffffffffa0462ad4>] __extent_writepage+0x2f4/0x760 [btrfs] Here we fix it by avoiding joining transaction again if we have held a transaction handle when allocating chunk in find_free_extent(). Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: use helpers for last_trans_log_full_commit instead of opencodeMiao Xie4-27/+36
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: check if items are ordered when a leaf is marked dirtyFilipe Manana1-0/+6
To ease finding bugs during development related to modifying btree leaves in such a way that it makes its items not sorted by key anymore. Since this is an expensive check, it's only enabled if CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY is set, which isn't meant to be enabled for regular users. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: don't access non-existent key when csum tree is emptyFilipe Manana1-1/+1
When the csum tree is empty, our leaf (path->nodes[0]) has a number of items equal to 0 and since btrfs_header_nritems() returns an unsigned integer (and so is our local nritems variable) the following comparison always evaluates to false: if (path->slots[0] >= nritems - 1) { As the casting rules lead to: if ((u32)0 >= (u32)4294967295) { This makes us access key at slot paths->slots[0] + 1 (1) of the empty leaf some lines below: btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key, slot); if (found_key.objectid != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID || found_key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY) { found_next = 1; goto insert; } So just don't access such non-existent slot and don't set found_next to 1 when the tree is empty. It's very unlikely we'll get a random key with the objectid and type values above, which is where we could go into trouble. If nritems is 0, just set found_next to 1 anyway as it will make us insert a csum item covering our whole extent (or the whole leaf) when the tree is empty. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: make sure there are not any read requests before stopping workersWang Shilong1-0/+5
In close_ctree(), after we have stopped all workers,there maybe still some read requests(for example readahead) to submit and this *maybe* trigger an oops that user reported before: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:619! By hacking codes, i can reproduce this problem with one cpu available. We fix this potential problem by invalidating all btree inode pages before stopping all workers. Thanks to Miao for pointing out this problem. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in btrfs_create_tree()Tsutomu Itoh1-0/+1
In btrfs_create_tree(), if btrfs_insert_root() fails, we should free root->commit_root. Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: remove useless ACL checkZhangZhen1-7/+0
posix_acl_xattr_set() already does the check, and it's the only way to feed in an ACL from userspace. So the check here is useless, remove it. Signed-off-by: zhang zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: btrfs_rm_device() should zero mirror SB as wellAnand Jain1-0/+31
This fix will ensure all SB copies on the disk is zeroed when the disk is intentionally removed. This helps to better manage disks in the user land. This version of patch also merges the Zach patch as below. btrfs: don't double brelse on device rm Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: use bitfield instead of integer data type for the some variants in ↵Miao Xie12-94/+109
btrfs_root Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renamesFilipe Manana1-94/+96
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: send, remove dead code from __get_cur_name_and_parentFilipe Manana1-6/+0
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: send, account for orphan directories when building path stringsFilipe Manana1-24/+9
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/g $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h $ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE $ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The second receive command failed with the following error: ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: send, avoid unnecessary inode item lookup in the btreeFilipe Manana1-6/+7
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which is in some cases). Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: add dev maxs limit for __btrfs_alloc_chunk in kernel spaceGui Hecheng1-0/+16
For RAID0,5,6,10, For system chunk, there shouldn't be too many stripes to make a btrfs_chunk that exceeds BTRFS_SYSTEM_CHUNK_ARRAY_SIZE For data/meta chunk, there shouldn't be too many stripes to make a btrfs_chunk that exceeds a leaf. Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: fix wrong max system array size check in kernel spaceGui Hecheng1-1/+2
For system chunk array, We copy a "disk_key" and an chunk item each time, so there should be enough space to hold both of them, not only the chunk item. Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: Add check to avoid cleanup roots already in fs_info->dead_roots.Qu Wenruo1-7/+30
Current btrfs_orphan_cleanup will also cleanup roots which is already in fs_info->dead_roots without protection. This will have conditional race with fs_info->cleaner_kthread. This patch will use refs in root->root_item to detect roots in dead_roots and avoid conflicts. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: reclaim the reserved metadata space at backgroundMiao Xie4-1/+114
Before applying this patch, the task had to reclaim the metadata space by itself if the metadata space was not enough. And When the task started the space reclamation, all the other tasks which wanted to reserve the metadata space were blocked. At some cases, they would be blocked for a long time, it made the performance fluctuate wildly. So we introduce the background metadata space reclamation, when the space is about to be exhausted, we insert a reclaim work into the workqueue, the worker of the workqueue helps us to reclaim the reserved space at the background. By this way, the tasks needn't reclaim the space by themselves at most cases, and even if the tasks have to reclaim the space or are blocked for the space reclamation, they will get enough space more quickly. Here is my test result(Tested by compilebench): Memory: 2GB CPU: 2Cores * 1CPU Partition: 40GB(SSD) Test command: # compilebench -D <mnt> -m Without this patch: intial create total runs 30 avg 54.36 MB/s (user 0.52s sys 2.44s) compile total runs 30 avg 123.72 MB/s (user 0.13s sys 1.17s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 81.15 MB/s (user 0.74s sys 4.89s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 5.32 seconds (user 0.35s sys 4.37s) With this patch: intial create total runs 30 avg 59.80 MB/s (user 0.52s sys 2.53s) compile total runs 30 avg 151.44 MB/s (user 0.13s sys 1.11s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 83.25 MB/s (user 0.76s sys 4.91s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 5.29 seconds (user 0.34s sys 4.34s) Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: output warning instead of error when loading free space cache failedMiao Xie1-2/+2
If we fail to load a free space cache, we can rebuild it from the extent tree, so it is not a serious error, we should not output a error message that would make the users uncomfortable. This patch uses warning message instead of it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: Add ctime/mtime update for btrfs device add/remove.Qu Wenruo1-2/+24
Btrfs will send uevent to udev inform the device change, but ctime/mtime for the block device inode is not udpated, which cause libblkid used by btrfs-progs unable to detect device change and use old cache, causing 'btrfs dev scan; btrfs dev rmove; btrfs dev scan' give an error message. Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: assert that send is not in progres before root deletionDavid Sterba2-13/+1
CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during sendDavid Sterba3-2/+53
The patch "Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion" (18f687d538449373c37c) does not actually prevent to delete the snapshot and just takes care during background cleaning, but this seems rather user unfriendly, this patch implements the idea presented in http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30813.html - add an internal root_item flag to denote a dead root - check if the send_in_progress is set and refuse to delete, otherwise set the flag and proceed - check the flag in send similar to the btrfs_root_readonly checks, for all involved roots The root lookup in send via btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name will check if the root is really dead or not. If it is, ENOENT, aborted send. If it's alive, it's protected by send_in_progress, send can continue. CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: remove redundant null check in btrfs_dentry_release()Daeseok Youn1-2/+1
It doesn't need to check NULL for kfree() Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: implement inode_operations callback tmpfileFilipe Manana1-20/+98
This implements the tmpfile callback of struct inode_operations, introduced in the linux kernel 3.11, and implemented already by some filesystems. This callback is invoked by the VFS when the flag O_TMPFILE is passed to the open system call. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-06-09btrfs: make FS_INFO ioctl available to anyoneDavid Sterba1-3/+0
This ioctl provides basic info about the filesystem that can be obtained in other ways (eg. sysfs), there's no reason to restrict it to CAP_SYSADMIN. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: make DEV_INFO ioctl available to anyoneDavid Sterba1-3/+0
This ioctl provides basic info about the devices that can be obtained in other ways (eg. sysfs), there's no reason to restrict it to CAP_SYSADMIN. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfsDavid Sterba1-0/+40
Similar to the FS_INFO updates, export the basic filesystem info through sysfs: node size, sector size and clone alignment. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: retrieve more info from FS_INFO ioctlDavid Sterba2-1/+9
Provide the basic information about filesystem through the ioctl: * b-tree node size (same as leaf size) * sector size * expected alignment of CLONE_RANGE and EXTENT_SAME ioctl arguments Backward compatibility: if the values are 0, kernel does not provide this information, the applications should ignore them. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: balance filter: add limit of processed chunksDavid Sterba4-2/+27
This started as debugging helper, to watch the effects of converting between raid levels on multiple devices, but could be useful standalone. In my case the usage filter was not finegrained enough and led to converting too many chunks at once. Another example use is in connection with drange+devid or vrange filters that allow to work with a specific chunk or even with a chunk on a given device. The limit filter applies last, the value of 0 means no limiting. CC: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> CC: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix leaf corruption caused by ENOSPC while hole punchingFilipe Manana1-1/+19
While running a stress test with multiple threads writing to the same btrfs file system, I ended up with a situation where a leaf was corrupted in that it had 2 file extent item keys that had the same exact key. I was able to detect this quickly thanks to the following patch which triggers an assertion as soon as a leaf is marked dirty if there are duplicated keys or out of order keys: Btrfs: check if items are ordered when a leaf is marked dirty (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3955431/) Basically while running the test, I got the following in dmesg: [28877.415877] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 10706 at fs/btrfs/file.c:553 btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x435/0x440 [btrfs]() (...) [28877.415917] Call Trace: [28877.415922] [<ffffffff816f1189>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [28877.415926] [<ffffffff8104a32c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [28877.415929] [<ffffffff8104a37a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [28877.415944] [<ffffffffa03775a5>] btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x435/0x440 [btrfs] [28877.415949] [<ffffffff8118e7be>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfe/0x1c0 [28877.415962] [<ffffffffa03777d9>] fill_holes+0x229/0x3e0 [btrfs] [28877.415972] [<ffffffffa0345865>] ? block_rsv_add_bytes+0x55/0x80 [btrfs] [28877.415984] [<ffffffffa03792cb>] btrfs_fallocate+0xb6b/0xc20 [btrfs] (...) [29854.132560] BTRFS critical (device sdc): corrupt leaf, bad key order: block=955232256,root=1, slot=24 [29854.132565] BTRFS info (device sdc): leaf 955232256 total ptrs 40 free space 778 (...) [29854.132637] item 23 key (3486 108 667648) itemoff 2694 itemsize 53 [29854.132638] extent data disk bytenr 14574411776 nr 286720 [29854.132639] extent data offset 0 nr 286720 ram 286720 [29854.132640] item 24 key (3486 108 954368) itemoff 2641 itemsize 53 [29854.132641] extent data disk bytenr 0 nr 0 [29854.132643] extent data offset 0 nr 0 ram 0 [29854.132644] item 25 key (3486 108 954368) itemoff 2588 itemsize 53 [29854.132645] extent data disk bytenr 8699670528 nr 77824 [29854.132646] extent data offset 0 nr 77824 ram 77824 [29854.132647] item 26 key (3486 108 1146880) itemoff 2535 itemsize 53 [29854.132648] extent data disk bytenr 8699670528 nr 77824 [29854.132649] extent data offset 0 nr 77824 ram 77824 (...) [29854.132707] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3901! (...) [29854.132771] Call Trace: [29854.132779] [<ffffffffa0342b5c>] setup_items_for_insert+0x2dc/0x400 [btrfs] [29854.132791] [<ffffffffa0378537>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0xba7/0xdd0 [btrfs] [29854.132794] [<ffffffff8109c0d6>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1d0 [29854.132797] [<ffffffff8109c29d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [29854.132800] [<ffffffff8118e7be>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfe/0x1c0 [29854.132810] [<ffffffffa036783b>] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.66+0xab/0x310 [btrfs] [29854.132820] [<ffffffffa036a6c6>] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x116/0x340 [btrfs] [29854.132830] [<ffffffffa0374d53>] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x23/0x30 [btrfs] (...) So this is caused by getting an -ENOSPC error while punching a file hole, more specifically, we get -ENOSPC error from __btrfs_drop_extents in the while loop of file.c:btrfs_punch_hole() when it's unable to modify the btree to delete one or more file extent items due to lack of enough free space. When this happens, in btrfs_punch_hole(), we attempt to reclaim free space by switching our transaction block reservation object to root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv, end our transaction and start a new transaction basically - and, we keep increasing our current offset (cur_offset) as long as it's smaller than the end of the target range (lockend) - this makes use leave the loop with cur_offset == drop_end which in turn makes us call fill_holes() for inserting a file extent item that represents a 0 bytes range hole (and this insertion succeeds, as in the meanwhile more space became available). This 0 bytes file hole extent item is a problem because any subsequent caller of __btrfs_drop_extents (regular file writes, or fallocate calls for e.g.), with a start file offset that is equal to the offset of the hole, will not remove this extent item due to the following conditional in the while loop of __btrfs_drop_extents: if (extent_end <= search_start) { path->slots[0]++; goto next_slot; } This later makes the call to setup_items_for_insert() (at the very end of __btrfs_drop_extents), insert a new file extent item with the same offset as the 0 bytes file hole extent item that follows it. Needless is to say that this causes chaos, either when reading the leaf from disk (btree_readpage_end_io_hook), where we perform leaf sanity checks or in subsequent operations that manipulate file extent items, as in the fallocate call as shown by the dmesg trace above. Without my other patch to perform the leaf sanity checks once a leaf is marked as dirty (if the integrity checker is enabled), it would have been much harder to debug this issue. This change might fix a few similar issues reported by users in the mailing list regarding assertion failures in btrfs_set_item_key_safe calls performed by __btrfs_drop_extents, such as the following report: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/32938 Asking fill_holes() to create a 0 bytes wide file hole item also produced the first warning in the trace above, as we passed a range to btrfs_drop_extent_cache that has an end smaller (by -1) than its start. On 3.14 kernels this issue manifests itself through leaf corruption, as we get duplicated file extent item keys in a leaf when calling setup_items_for_insert(), but on older kernels, setup_items_for_insert() isn't called by __btrfs_drop_extents(), instead we have callers of __btrfs_drop_extents(), namely the functions inode.c:insert_inline_extent() and inode.c:insert_reserved_file_extent(), calling btrfs_insert_empty_item() to insert the new file extent item, which would fail with error -EEXIST, instead of inserting a duplicated key - which is still a serious issue as it would make all similar file extent item replace operations keep failing if they target the same file range. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: do not increment on bio_index one by oneLiu Bo1-1/+1
'bio_index' is just a index, it's really not necessary to do increment one by one. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: read inode size after acquiring the mutex when punching a holeFilipe Manana1-1/+2
In a previous change, commit 12870f1c9b2de7d475d22e73fd7db1b418599725, I accidentally moved the roundup of inode->i_size to outside of the critical section delimited by the inode mutex, which is not atomic and not correct since the size can be changed by other task before we acquire the mutex. Therefore fix it. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: Remove unnecessary check for NULLTobias Klauser1-2/+2
iput() already checks for the inode being NULL, thus it's unnecessary to check before calling. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>