summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Move platform_nand_xxx definitions out of rawnand.hBoris Brezillon22-95/+94
platform_nand_xxx definitions are just used by the plat_nand driver. Let's move those definitions out of the core/driver-agnostic rawnand.h header. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Get rid of a few unused definitionsBoris Brezillon2-22/+0
Those definitions are not used, let's remove them. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Get rid of the duplicate nand_chip forward declarationBoris Brezillon1-3/+0
There's already a forward declaration of nand_chip at the beginning of the file. Get rid of this one. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Get rid of nand_flash_dev forward declationBoris Brezillon1-1/+0
nand_scan[with_ids]() have been moved at the end of the file. We can now get rid of of the nand_flash_dev forward declaration. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Move function prototypes after struct declarationsBoris Brezillon1-12/+12
Move nand_scan[_with_ids]() and nand_wait_ready() at the end of the file where all function prototype lies. This will also allow us to get rid of the nand_flash_dev forward declaration. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->chip_delayBoris Brezillon39-54/+53
The wait timeouts and delays are directly extracted from the NAND timings and ->chip_delay is only used in legacy path, so let's move it to the nand_legacy struct to make it clear. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->{set,get}_features() hooksBoris Brezillon12-94/+70
Those hooks should be replaced by a proper ->exec_op() implementation. Move them to the nand_legacy struct to make it clear. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->erase()Boris Brezillon3-5/+8
The ->erase() hook have been overloaded by some drivers for bad reasons: either the driver was not fitting in the NAND framework and should have been an MTD driver (docg4), or the driver uses a specific path for the ERASE operation (denali), instead of implementing it generically. In any case, we should discourage people from overloading this method and encourage them to implement ->exec_op() instead. Move the ->erase() hook to the nand_legacy struct to make it clear. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->block_{bad,markbad}() hooksBoris Brezillon8-22/+40
Those hooks have been overloaded by some drivers for bad reasons: either the driver was not fitting in the NAND framework and should have been an MTD driver (docg4), or it was not properly implementing the OOB read/write request or had a weird layout where BBM are trashed. In any case, we should discourage people from overloading those methods and encourage them to fix their driver instead. Move the ->block_{bad,markbad}() hooks to the nand_legacy struct to make it clear. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->dev_ready() and ->waitfunc()Boris Brezillon42-93/+93
Those hooks have been replaced by ->exec_op(). Move them to the nand_legacy struct. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->cmd_ctrl() and ->cmdfunc()Boris Brezillon47-137/+144
Those hooks have been replaced by ->exec_op(). Move them to the nand_legacy struct. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Deprecate ->{read, write}_{byte, buf}() hooksBoris Brezillon42-200/+200
All those hooks have been replaced by ->exec_op(). Move them to the nand_legacy struct. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Create a legacy struct and move ->IO_ADDR_{R, W} thereBoris Brezillon37-175/+190
We regularly have new NAND controller drivers that are making use of fields/hooks that we want to get rid of but can't because of all the legacy drivers that we might break if we do. So, instead of removing those fields/hooks, let's move them to a sub-struct which is clearly documented as deprecated. We start with the ->IO_ADDR_{R,W] fields. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Leave chip->IO_ADDR_{R, W} to NULL when unusedBoris Brezillon2-7/+0
There's no point in poisoning the ->IO_ADDR_{R,W}, a NULL pointer is just as good to detect unexpected ->IO_ADDR_{R,W} usage. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Do not treat !maxchips specially in nand_scan_with_ids()Boris Brezillon1-8/+7
The only reason we were skipping nand_scan_ident() when maxchips == 0 was to make the docg4 to work. Now that this driver is gone we can remove this special case and return an error when maxchips is 0. Suggested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Make maxchips an unsigned intBoris Brezillon2-5/+6
There's no good reason to make maxchips a signed integer, since only positive values are valid. Make it an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03ARM: pxa: palmtreo: Drop docg4 specific initBoris Brezillon1-31/+0
The docg4 driver has been removed. Remove the code that was registering a docg4 device. Suggested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Remove docg4Boris Brezillon3-1458/+0
The diskonchip G4 driver does not fit very well in the raw/parallel NAND framework simply because such chips have an internal controller translating DoC-specific commands into NAND ones. Keeping such a driver in the raw NAND framework is a real burden for NAND maintainers. Not to mention that some parts of this driver are a bit worrisome: - writes are done by subpages, even though we're interfacing with an MLC chip which are known to not support subpage writes very well (it might be that the FTL handles the complexity for us though) - some part of the code are simply ignoring return codes of function that can fail in a few occasions - there's a hack to support OOB writes when no data is provided. This operation is not supported by the chip and should have been rejected, and nandwrite and other userspace tools should have been patched to deal with such devices - the driver is apparently broken when ignore_badblocks module param is not set to 1 and nobody noticed that (don't know since when this is the case, but it's not a recent change) http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2018-July/082472.html Add to that the fact that we already have a docg3 driver in drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.c and, looking at the code (and regs), it seems docg3 and docg4 have a lot in common (even the author of this driver seemed to have realized that interfacing with the raw NAND framework might have been a bad idea http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-January/039517.html). For all these reasons, I'm proposing to remove this driver. If anyone ever wants to add support for this chip back, I'd suggest extending the docg3 driver instead of adding a completely new driver. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Cc: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com> Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Cc: Sergey Larin <cerg2010cerg2010@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: marvell: support 8b/512B strength for 2kiB pages layoutMiquel Raynal1-3/+31
Add support for the layout used by 2kiB page NAND chips requesting at least 8-bit of correction per 512 bytes. This layout requires a bit of handling as: 1/ It can only fit if the NAND chip has at least 128 OOB bytes. 2/ The Bad Block Markers are located in the middle of the data bytes and shall not be used. 3/ It has been experimentally observed that, for certain layouts, the ECC engine tries to correct data while it should not because the errors are uncorrectable. While this is harmless for truly bad pages, it creates bitflips in empty pages. To avoid such scenario that augments artificially the number of bitflips we re-read in raw mode the entire page instead of just the ECC bytes. This is done only for this layout to avoid an unneeded penalty with other setups. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: marvell: rework BCH engine failure pathMiquel Raynal1-31/+42
We are about to support a new layout that triggers a faulty mechanism in BCH engine that creates bitflips in erased pages. Before adding the quirk that will workaround this issue, this patch just reworks a bit the section that handles ECC failures in BCH read path. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object nand_erase_nand()Boris Brezillon3-7/+7
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the nand_erase_nand() helper. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to all nand_xxx_bbt() helpersBoris Brezillon3-15/+13
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the nand_xxx_bbt() helpers. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->setup_data_interface()Boris Brezillon14-31/+21
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->setup_data_interface() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->setup_read_retry()Boris Brezillon4-12/+8
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->setup_read_retry() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->{get, set}_features()Boris Brezillon3-29/+20
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->{get,set}_features() hooks. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->erase()Boris Brezillon4-9/+8
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->erase() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->waitfunc()Boris Brezillon15-57/+42
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->waitfunc() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->cmdfunc()Boris Brezillon18-64/+64
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->cmdfunc() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->dev_ready()Boris Brezillon37-88/+68
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->dev_ready() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->cmd_ctrl()Boris Brezillon35-125/+98
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->cmd_ctrl() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->block_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon9-25/+24
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->block_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->select_chip()Boris Brezillon34-145/+117
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->select_chip() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->write_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon42-203/+163
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->write_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->read_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon42-247/+186
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->read_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->write_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon26-214/+208
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all ecc->write_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->read_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon28-223/+221
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all ecc->read_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->correct()Boris Brezillon17-55/+52
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is ecc->correct()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->calculate()Boris Brezillon20-66/+69
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is ecc->calculate()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->hwctl()Boris Brezillon17-53/+51
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is ecc->hwctl()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to nand_wait_ready()Boris Brezillon4-9/+9
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is nand_wait_ready()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to nand_release()Boris Brezillon49-75/+66
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is nand_release()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to nand_scan()Boris Brezillon52-64/+64
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. We start with nand_scan(). Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: plat_nand: Pass a nand_chip object to all platform_nand_ctrl hooksBoris Brezillon23-77/+102
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. In order to do that, we first need to update the platform_nand_ctrl hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info. We add temporary plat_nand_xxx() wrappers to the do the mtd -> chip conversion, but those will be dropped when patching nand_chip hooks to take a nand_chip object. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl> Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: atmel: use struct_size() in devm_kzalloc()Gustavo A. R. Silva1-3/+1
One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example: struct foo { int stuff; void *entry[]; }; instance = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct foo) + sizeof(void *) * count, GFP_KERNEL); Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can now use the new struct_size() helper: instance = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(instance, entry, count), GFP_KERNEL); This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: jz4780: use struct_size() in devm_kzalloc()Gustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example: struct foo { int stuff; void *entry[]; }; instance = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct foo) + sizeof(void *) * count, GFP_KERNEL); Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can now use the new struct_size() helper: instance = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(instance, entry, count), GFP_KERNEL); Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.nameRob Herring2-4/+4
In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: qcom: don't include dma-direct.hChristoph Hellwig1-1/+0
A recent commit removed the incorrect use of phys_to_dma from this driver, but failed to remove the dma-direct.h include, so do that now. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: denali: use SPDX-License-Identifier and fix license mismatchMasahiro Yamada4-38/+11
Use SPDX-License-Identifier instead of the license boilerplates. This conversion makes it easier for us to scan the license, then I notice license mismatch problems. The license blocks in denali* indicate GPL-2.0 "only", while the MODULE_LICENSE in denali.c and denali_dt.c is GPL-2.0 "or later" as explained in include/linux/module.h as follows: "GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or later] "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] I fixed the MODULE_LICENSE tags, assuming the license blocks are the authors' intention. Also, add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION/AUTHOR to denali.c While I am touching the license things, I added my credit to denali.c because this driver was largely re-written by me in 2017. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: fsl_ifc: fixup SRAM init for newer ctrl versionsKurt Kanzenbach2-7/+28
Newer versions of the IFC controller use a different method of initializing the internal SRAM: Instead of reading from flash, a bit in the NAND configuration register has to be set in order to trigger the self-initializing process. Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-09-04mtd: rawnand: fsl_ifc: check result of SRAM initializationKurt Kanzenbach1-4/+13
The SRAM initialization might fail. If that happens further NAND operations won't be successful. Therefore, the chip init routine should fail if the SRAM initialization didn't work. Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>