diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 8 |
3 files changed, 10 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 0a44b90602b0..1c67ca100e4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ * contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap. * * See http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html - * http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html + * and section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6" + * (Publication # 21266 Issue Date: August 1998) * * The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up * the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some @@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n"); else printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n"); - printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n"); } /* K6 with old style WHCR */ @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu); /* - * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform, - * so invoke platform-specific handler + * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a + * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some + * IDs of the CPU. */ - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) + if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id) x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node); if (!node_online(node)) { diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 67e258362a3d..cf79302198a6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1163,15 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void) #endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */ /* - * Prints an error where the NUMA and configured core-number mismatch and the - * platform didn't override this to fix it up - */ -void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node) -{ - pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id); -} - -/* * cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already * initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT * and IDT. We reload them nevertheless, this function acts as a diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c index 73d08ed98a64..b8f3653dddbc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c @@ -433,14 +433,14 @@ int amd_set_l3_disable_slot(struct amd_northbridge *nb, int cpu, unsigned slot, /* check if @slot is already used or the index is already disabled */ ret = amd_get_l3_disable_slot(nb, slot); if (ret >= 0) - return -EINVAL; + return -EEXIST; if (index > nb->l3_cache.indices) return -EINVAL; /* check whether the other slot has disabled the same index already */ if (index == amd_get_l3_disable_slot(nb, !slot)) - return -EINVAL; + return -EEXIST; amd_l3_disable_index(nb, cpu, slot, index); @@ -468,8 +468,8 @@ static ssize_t store_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, err = amd_set_l3_disable_slot(this_leaf->base.nb, cpu, slot, val); if (err) { if (err == -EEXIST) - printk(KERN_WARNING "L3 disable slot %d in use!\n", - slot); + pr_warning("L3 slot %d in use/index already disabled!\n", + slot); return err; } return count; |