summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst30
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
index d5c9320901c3..4b9ed5874d5a 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Q: I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it?
Q: How can I tell whether it got merged?
A: Start by looking at the main patchworks queue for netdev:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
+ https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
The "State" field will tell you exactly where things are at with your
patch.
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ networking subsystem, and then hands them off to Greg.
There is a patchworks queue that you can see here:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*
+ https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/netdev/stable/?state=*
It contains the patches which Dave has selected, but not yet handed off
to Greg. If Greg already has the patch, then it will be here:
@@ -254,6 +254,32 @@ you will have done run-time testing specific to your change, but at a
minimum, your changes should survive an ``allyesconfig`` and an
``allmodconfig`` build without new warnings or failures.
+Q: How do I post corresponding changes to user space components?
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+A: User space code exercising kernel features should be posted
+alongside kernel patches. This gives reviewers a chance to see
+how any new interface is used and how well it works.
+
+When user space tools reside in the kernel repo itself all changes
+should generally come as one series. If series becomes too large
+or the user space project is not reviewed on netdev include a link
+to a public repo where user space patches can be seen.
+
+In case user space tooling lives in a separate repository but is
+reviewed on netdev (e.g. patches to `iproute2` tools) kernel and
+user space patches should form separate series (threads) when posted
+to the mailing list, e.g.::
+
+ [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: some feature cover letter
+ └─ [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: some feature prep
+ └─ [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: some feature do it
+ └─ [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftest: net: some feature
+
+ [PATCH iproute2-next] ip: add support for some feature
+
+Posting as one thread is discouraged because it confuses patchwork
+(as of patchwork 2.2.2).
+
Q: Any other tips to help ensure my net/net-next patch gets OK'd?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A: Attention to detail. Re-read your own work as if you were the