diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 57 |
2 files changed, 63 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst index 0fc3fb1860c4..1651d961f06a 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst @@ -160,29 +160,14 @@ intended for use in production as a security mitigation. Therefore it supports boot parameters that allow to disable KASAN competely or otherwise control particular KASAN features. -The things that can be controlled are: +- ``kasan=off`` or ``=on`` controls whether KASAN is enabled (default: ``on``). -1. Whether KASAN is enabled at all. -2. Whether KASAN collects and saves alloc/free stacks. -3. Whether KASAN panics on a detected bug or not. +- ``kasan.stacktrace=off`` or ``=on`` disables or enables alloc and free stack + traces collection (default: ``on`` for ``CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y``, otherwise + ``off``). -The ``kasan.mode`` boot parameter allows to choose one of three main modes: - -- ``kasan.mode=off`` - KASAN is disabled, no tag checks are performed -- ``kasan.mode=prod`` - only essential production features are enabled -- ``kasan.mode=full`` - all KASAN features are enabled - -The chosen mode provides default control values for the features mentioned -above. However it's also possible to override the default values by providing: - -- ``kasan.stacktrace=off`` or ``=on`` - enable alloc/free stack collection - (default: ``on`` for ``mode=full``, - otherwise ``off``) -- ``kasan.fault=report`` or ``=panic`` - only print KASAN report or also panic - (default: ``report``) - -If ``kasan.mode`` parameter is not provided, it defaults to ``full`` when -``CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL`` is enabled, and to ``prod`` otherwise. +- ``kasan.fault=report`` or ``=panic`` controls whether to only print a KASAN + report or also panic the kernel (default: ``report``). For developers ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index d9fdc14f0677..650f99590df5 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -522,6 +522,63 @@ There's more boilerplate involved, but it can: * E.g. if we wanted to also test ``sha256sum``, we could add a ``sha256`` field and reuse ``cases``. +* be converted to a "parameterized test", see below. + +Parameterized Testing +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The table-driven testing pattern is common enough that KUnit has special +support for it. + +Reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a +"parameterized test" with the following. + +.. code-block:: c + + // This is copy-pasted from above. + struct sha1_test_case { + const char *str; + const char *sha1; + }; + struct sha1_test_case cases[] = { + { + .str = "hello world", + .sha1 = "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed", + }, + { + .str = "hello world!", + .sha1 = "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169", + }, + }; + + // Need a helper function to generate a name for each test case. + static void case_to_desc(const struct sha1_test_case *t, char *desc) + { + strcpy(desc, t->str); + } + // Creates `sha1_gen_params()` to iterate over `cases`. + KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(sha1, cases, case_to_desc); + + // Looks no different from a normal test. + static void sha1_test(struct kunit *test) + { + // This function can just contain the body of the for-loop. + // The former `cases[i]` is accessible under test->param_value. + char out[40]; + struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value); + + sha1sum(test_param->str, out); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, test_param->sha1, + "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str); + } + + // Instead of KUNIT_CASE, we use KUNIT_CASE_PARAM and pass in the + // function declared by KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM. + static struct kunit_case sha1_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(sha1_test, sha1_gen_params), + {} + }; + .. _kunit-on-non-uml: KUnit on non-UML architectures |