diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/workqueue.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 30 |
2 files changed, 29 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h index c102ef65cb64..db6dc9dc0482 100644 --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ enum { __WQ_DRAINING = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */ __WQ_ORDERED = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */ + __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */ __WQ_LEGACY = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */ WQ_MAX_ACTIVE = 512, /* I like 512, better ideas? */ @@ -422,7 +423,8 @@ __alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, int max_active, * Pointer to the allocated workqueue on success, %NULL on failure. */ #define alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, flags, args...) \ - alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED | (flags), 1, ##args) + alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED | \ + __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT | (flags), 1, ##args) #define create_workqueue(name) \ alloc_workqueue("%s", __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, (name)) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index a86688fabc55..ca937b0c3a96 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3577,6 +3577,13 @@ static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node, /* yeap, return possible CPUs in @node that @attrs wants */ cpumask_and(cpumask, attrs->cpumask, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]); + + if (cpumask_empty(cpumask)) { + pr_warn_once("WARNING: workqueue cpumask: online intersect > " + "possible intersect\n"); + return false; + } + return !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask); use_dfl: @@ -3744,8 +3751,12 @@ static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq, return -EINVAL; /* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */ - if (WARN_ON((wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) && !list_empty(&wq->pwqs))) - return -EINVAL; + if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) { + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) + return -EINVAL; + + wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED; + } ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, attrs); if (!ctx) @@ -3929,6 +3940,16 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, struct workqueue_struct *wq; struct pool_workqueue *pwq; + /* + * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no + * longer the case on NUMA machines due to per-node pools. While + * alloc_ordered_workqueue() is the right way to create an ordered + * workqueue, keep the previous behavior to avoid subtle breakages + * on NUMA. + */ + if ((flags & WQ_UNBOUND) && max_active == 1) + flags |= __WQ_ORDERED; + /* see the comment above the definition of WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT */ if ((flags & WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT) && wq_power_efficient) flags |= WQ_UNBOUND; @@ -4119,13 +4140,14 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active) struct pool_workqueue *pwq; /* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */ - if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)) + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) return; max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, wq->flags, wq->name); mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); + wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED; wq->saved_max_active = max_active; for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) @@ -5253,7 +5275,7 @@ int workqueue_sysfs_register(struct workqueue_struct *wq) * attributes breaks ordering guarantee. Disallow exposing ordered * workqueues. */ - if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)) + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) return -EINVAL; wq->wq_dev = wq_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq_dev), GFP_KERNEL); |