diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 102 |
8 files changed, 128 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 597afdbc1ab9..8050caea7495 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -232,6 +232,20 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { */ #define BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT (1U << 0) +/* If BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT is used in BPF_PROF_LOAD command, the + * verifier will allow any alignment whatsoever. On platforms + * with strict alignment requirements for loads ands stores (such + * as sparc and mips) the verifier validates that all loads and + * stores provably follow this requirement. This flag turns that + * checking and enforcement off. + * + * It is mostly used for testing when we want to validate the + * context and memory access aspects of the verifier, but because + * of an unaligned access the alignment check would trigger before + * the one we are interested in. + */ +#define BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT (1U << 1) + /* when bpf_ldimm64->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD, bpf_ldimm64->imm == fd */ #define BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD 1 diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 85cbeec06e50..f9554d9a14e1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1452,9 +1452,14 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_LOAD)) return -EINVAL; - if (attr->prog_flags & ~BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT) + if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT | BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)) return -EINVAL; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && + (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) && + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EPERM; + /* copy eBPF program license from user space */ if (strncpy_from_user(license, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->license), sizeof(license) - 1) < 0) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 9584438fa2cc..71988337ac14 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -6505,6 +6505,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, env->strict_alignment = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT); if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) env->strict_alignment = true; + if (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) + env->strict_alignment = false; ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env); if (ret < 0) diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 597afdbc1ab9..8050caea7495 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -232,6 +232,20 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { */ #define BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT (1U << 0) +/* If BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT is used in BPF_PROF_LOAD command, the + * verifier will allow any alignment whatsoever. On platforms + * with strict alignment requirements for loads ands stores (such + * as sparc and mips) the verifier validates that all loads and + * stores provably follow this requirement. This flag turns that + * checking and enforcement off. + * + * It is mostly used for testing when we want to validate the + * context and memory access aspects of the verifier, but because + * of an unaligned access the alignment check would trigger before + * the one we are interested in. + */ +#define BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT (1U << 1) + /* when bpf_ldimm64->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD, bpf_ldimm64->imm == fd */ #define BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD 1 diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index ce1822194590..c19226cccf39 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c @@ -279,9 +279,9 @@ int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, } int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, - size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, - const char *license, __u32 kern_version, - char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level) + size_t insns_cnt, __u32 prog_flags, const char *license, + __u32 kern_version, char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, + int log_level) { union bpf_attr attr; @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, attr.log_level = log_level; log_buf[0] = 0; attr.kern_version = kern_version; - attr.prog_flags = strict_alignment ? BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT : 0; + attr.prog_flags = prog_flags; return sys_bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr)); } diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h index 09e8bbe111d4..60392b70587c 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz); LIBBPF_API int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, - size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, + size_t insns_cnt, __u32 prog_flags, const char *license, __u32 kern_version, char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 5f377ec53f2f..3c789d03b629 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -620,8 +620,8 @@ static int do_test_single(struct bpf_align_test *test) prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - prog, prog_len, 1, "GPL", 0, - bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 2); + prog, prog_len, BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, + "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 2); if (fd_prog < 0 && test->result != REJECT) { printf("Failed to load program.\n"); printf("%s", bpf_vlog); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 5eace1f606fb..c3b038f26ece 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1823,6 +1823,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet read for SK_MSG", @@ -2215,6 +2216,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check cb access: half, wrong type", @@ -3281,6 +3284,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs corruption 2", @@ -3311,6 +3315,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs + data", @@ -3810,6 +3815,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)", @@ -3912,6 +3918,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test21 (x += pkt_ptr, 2)", @@ -3937,6 +3944,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3)", @@ -3967,6 +3975,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4)", @@ -3993,6 +4002,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=8, R5(id=1,off=0,r=0)", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5)", @@ -4018,6 +4028,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access)", @@ -5149,6 +5160,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid cgroup storage access 5", @@ -5265,6 +5277,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid per-cpu cgroup storage access 5", @@ -7206,6 +7219,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map element value illegal alu op, 5", @@ -7228,6 +7242,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map element value is preserved across register spilling", @@ -7721,6 +7736,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)", @@ -9683,6 +9699,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1", @@ -9720,6 +9737,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access", @@ -9758,6 +9776,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2", @@ -9776,6 +9795,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access", @@ -9814,6 +9834,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2", @@ -9832,6 +9853,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access", @@ -9849,6 +9871,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1", @@ -9886,6 +9909,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access", @@ -9922,6 +9946,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2", @@ -9959,6 +9984,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1", @@ -9997,6 +10023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access", @@ -10015,6 +10042,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1", @@ -10053,6 +10081,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access", @@ -10089,6 +10118,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2", @@ -10125,6 +10155,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' > pkt_data, bad access 1", @@ -10162,6 +10193,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10200,6 +10232,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', bad access 2", @@ -10218,6 +10251,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, good access", @@ -10256,6 +10290,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, bad access 2", @@ -10274,6 +10309,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10291,6 +10327,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', bad access 1", @@ -10328,6 +10365,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, good access", @@ -10364,6 +10402,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, bad access 2", @@ -10401,6 +10440,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data >= pkt_meta', bad access 1", @@ -10439,6 +10479,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, good access", @@ -10457,6 +10498,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1", @@ -10495,6 +10537,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10531,6 +10574,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2", @@ -10635,6 +10679,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 8", @@ -10648,6 +10693,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 9", @@ -11122,6 +11168,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls with args", @@ -11987,6 +12034,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test2", @@ -12130,6 +12178,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test1", @@ -12301,6 +12350,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .retval = POINTER_VALUE, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 2", @@ -12332,6 +12382,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 3", @@ -12367,6 +12418,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4", @@ -12401,6 +12453,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5", @@ -12434,6 +12487,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 6", @@ -12469,6 +12523,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "R4 invalid mem access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 7", @@ -12503,6 +12558,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "R4 invalid mem access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 8", @@ -12543,6 +12599,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 9", @@ -12584,6 +12641,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: caller stack init to zero or map_value_or_null", @@ -12949,6 +13007,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R2 pkt is not allowed", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 1", @@ -13435,6 +13494,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "Unreleased reference", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: alloc, check, free in both subbranches", @@ -13463,6 +13523,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog", @@ -14257,13 +14318,14 @@ out: static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int *passes, int *errors) { - int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment; + int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution; int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type; struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns; int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; uint32_t expected_val; uint32_t retval; + __u32 pflags; int i, err; for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) @@ -14274,8 +14336,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds); prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); - fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, - test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, + pflags = 0; + if (test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT) + pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT; + if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) + pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT; + fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags, "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1); expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ? @@ -14285,28 +14351,27 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ? test->retval_unpriv : test->retval; - reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 && - (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && - strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned"); -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (reject_from_alignment) { - printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n", - strerror(errno)); - goto fail_log; - } -#endif + alignment_prevented_execution = 0; + if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) { - if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (fd_prog < 0) { printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); goto fail_log; } +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + if (fd_prog >= 0 && + (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) { + alignment_prevented_execution = 1; + goto test_ok; + } +#endif } else { if (fd_prog >= 0) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n"); goto fail_log; } - if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n", expected_err, bpf_vlog); goto fail_log; @@ -14334,9 +14399,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, goto fail_log; } } +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +test_ok: +#endif (*passes)++; - printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ? - " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : ""); + printf("OK%s\n", alignment_prevented_execution ? + " (NOTE: not executed due to unknown alignment)" : ""); close_fds: close(fd_prog); for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) |