diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 179 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index d4f37634194e..ef123356c6ab 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1822,6 +1822,58 @@ out: } } +/* + * This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim. + */ +static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) +{ + unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS]; + unsigned long nr_to_scan; + enum lru_list lru; + unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0; + unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = sc->nr_to_reclaim; + struct blk_plug plug; + + get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr); + + blk_start_plug(&plug); + while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] || + nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) { + for_each_evictable_lru(lru) { + if (nr[lru]) { + nr_to_scan = min(nr[lru], SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); + nr[lru] -= nr_to_scan; + + nr_reclaimed += shrink_list(lru, nr_to_scan, + lruvec, sc); + } + } + /* + * On large memory systems, scan >> priority can become + * really large. This is fine for the starting priority; + * we want to put equal scanning pressure on each zone. + * However, if the VM has a harder time of freeing pages, + * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total + * freeing target can get unreasonably large. + */ + if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && + sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY) + break; + } + blk_finish_plug(&plug); + sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_reclaimed; + + /* + * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to + * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio. + */ + if (inactive_anon_is_low(lruvec)) + shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, + sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); + + throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask); +} + /* Use reclaim/compaction for costly allocs or under memory pressure */ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc) { @@ -1840,7 +1892,7 @@ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc) * calls try_to_compact_zone() that it will have enough free pages to succeed. * It will give up earlier than that if there is difficulty reclaiming pages. */ -static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct lruvec *lruvec, +static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone, unsigned long nr_reclaimed, unsigned long nr_scanned, struct scan_control *sc) @@ -1880,15 +1932,15 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct lruvec *lruvec, * inactive lists are large enough, continue reclaiming */ pages_for_compaction = (2UL << sc->order); - inactive_lru_pages = get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE); + inactive_lru_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); if (nr_swap_pages > 0) - inactive_lru_pages += get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); + inactive_lru_pages += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); if (sc->nr_reclaimed < pages_for_compaction && inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction) return true; /* If compaction would go ahead or the allocation would succeed, stop */ - switch (compaction_suitable(lruvec_zone(lruvec), sc->order)) { + switch (compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order)) { case COMPACT_PARTIAL: case COMPACT_CONTINUE: return false; @@ -1897,98 +1949,49 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct lruvec *lruvec, } } -/* - * This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim. - */ -static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) +static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) { - unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS]; - unsigned long nr_to_scan; - enum lru_list lru; unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned; - unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = sc->nr_to_reclaim; - struct blk_plug plug; - -restart: - nr_reclaimed = 0; - nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; - get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr); - - blk_start_plug(&plug); - while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] || - nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) { - for_each_evictable_lru(lru) { - if (nr[lru]) { - nr_to_scan = min_t(unsigned long, - nr[lru], SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); - nr[lru] -= nr_to_scan; - - nr_reclaimed += shrink_list(lru, nr_to_scan, - lruvec, sc); - } - } - /* - * On large memory systems, scan >> priority can become - * really large. This is fine for the starting priority; - * we want to put equal scanning pressure on each zone. - * However, if the VM has a harder time of freeing pages, - * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total - * freeing target can get unreasonably large. - */ - if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && - sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY) - break; - } - blk_finish_plug(&plug); - sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_reclaimed; - /* - * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to - * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio. - */ - if (inactive_anon_is_low(lruvec)) - shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, - sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); - - /* reclaim/compaction might need reclaim to continue */ - if (should_continue_reclaim(lruvec, nr_reclaimed, - sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc)) - goto restart; + do { + struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup; + struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = { + .zone = zone, + .priority = sc->priority, + }; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask); -} + nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; + nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; -static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup; - struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = { - .zone = zone, - .priority = sc->priority, - }; - struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim); + do { + struct lruvec *lruvec; - memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim); - do { - struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg); + lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg); - shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc); + shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc); - /* - * Limit reclaim has historically picked one memcg and - * scanned it with decreasing priority levels until - * nr_to_reclaim had been reclaimed. This priority - * cycle is thus over after a single memcg. - * - * Direct reclaim and kswapd, on the other hand, have - * to scan all memory cgroups to fulfill the overall - * scan target for the zone. - */ - if (!global_reclaim(sc)) { - mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg); - break; - } - memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim); - } while (memcg); + /* + * Limit reclaim has historically picked one + * memcg and scanned it with decreasing + * priority levels until nr_to_reclaim had + * been reclaimed. This priority cycle is + * thus over after a single memcg. + * + * Direct reclaim and kswapd, on the other + * hand, have to scan all memory cgroups to + * fulfill the overall scan target for the + * zone. + */ + if (!global_reclaim(sc)) { + mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg); + break; + } + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim); + } while (memcg); + } while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed, + sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc)); } /* Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a high-order request */ |