diff options
author | Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> | 2019-11-17 09:28:04 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2019-11-18 11:41:59 +0100 |
commit | fc9702273e2edb90400a34b3be76f7b08fa3344b (patch) | |
tree | 2b4f1121496869a32b6f82c63a7e37e737b6e356 /tools | |
parent | 85192dbf4de08795afe2b88e52a36fc6abfc3dba (diff) | |
download | linux-fc9702273e2edb90400a34b3be76f7b08fa3344b.tar.bz2 |
bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY
Add ability to memory-map contents of BPF array map. This is extremely useful
for working with BPF global data from userspace programs. It allows to avoid
typical bpf_map_{lookup,update}_elem operations, improving both performance
and usability.
There had to be special considerations for map freezing, to avoid having
writable memory view into a frozen map. To solve this issue, map freezing and
mmap-ing is happening under mutex now:
- if map is already frozen, no writable mapping is allowed;
- if map has writable memory mappings active (accounted in map->writecnt),
map freezing will keep failing with -EBUSY;
- once number of writable memory mappings drops to zero, map freezing can be
performed again.
Only non-per-CPU plain arrays are supported right now. Maps with spinlocks
can't be memory mapped either.
For BPF_F_MMAPABLE array, memory allocation has to be done through vmalloc()
to be mmap()'able. We also need to make sure that array data memory is
page-sized and page-aligned, so we over-allocate memory in such a way that
struct bpf_array is at the end of a single page of memory with array->value
being aligned with the start of the second page. On deallocation we need to
accomodate this memory arrangement to free vmalloc()'ed memory correctly.
One important consideration regarding how memory-mapping subsystem functions.
Memory-mapping subsystem provides few optional callbacks, among them open()
and close(). close() is called for each memory region that is unmapped, so
that users can decrease their reference counters and free up resources, if
necessary. open() is *almost* symmetrical: it's called for each memory region
that is being mapped, **except** the very first one. So bpf_map_mmap does
initial refcnt bump, while open() will do any extra ones after that. Thus
number of close() calls is equal to number of open() calls plus one more.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191117172806.2195367-4-andriin@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 4842a134b202..dbbcf0b02970 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -348,6 +348,9 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { /* Clone map from listener for newly accepted socket */ #define BPF_F_CLONE (1U << 9) +/* Enable memory-mapping BPF map */ +#define BPF_F_MMAPABLE (1U << 10) + /* flags for BPF_PROG_QUERY */ #define BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE (1U << 0) |