diff options
author | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> | 2021-05-06 18:04:04 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-05-06 19:24:13 -0700 |
commit | 1e3b918d1dd18bcea3df9339c2d8910ffa95686a (patch) | |
tree | 6f3c8b7b168746727fa972d604bbfe22e640b0d1 /tools | |
parent | 7e6cdd7fd94380a3b87b2ce087903b3722b3d0d6 (diff) | |
download | linux-1e3b918d1dd18bcea3df9339c2d8910ffa95686a.tar.bz2 |
kselftest: introduce new epoll test case
Patch series "fs/epoll: restore user-visible behavior upon event ready".
This series tries to address a change in user visible behavior, reported
in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208943.
Epoll does not report an event to all the threads running epoll_wait()
on the same epoll descriptor. Unsurprisingly, this was bisected back to
339ddb53d373 (fs/epoll: remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll), which
has had various problems in the past, beyond only nested epoll usage.
This patch (of 2):
This incorporates the testcase originally reported in:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208943
Which ensures an event is reported to all threads blocked on the same
epoll descriptor, otherwise only a single thread will receive the wakeup
once the event become ready.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210405231025.33829-1-dave@stgolabs.net
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210405231025.33829-2-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c | 44 |
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c index ad7fabd575f9..65ede506305c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c @@ -3449,4 +3449,48 @@ TEST(epoll63) close(sfd[1]); } +/* + * t0 t1 + * (ew) \ / (ew) + * e0 + * | (lt) + * s0 + */ +TEST(epoll64) +{ + pthread_t waiter[2]; + struct epoll_event e; + struct epoll_mtcontext ctx = { 0 }; + + signal(SIGUSR1, signal_handler); + + ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, ctx.sfd), 0); + + ctx.efd[0] = epoll_create(1); + ASSERT_GE(ctx.efd[0], 0); + + e.events = EPOLLIN; + ASSERT_EQ(epoll_ctl(ctx.efd[0], EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ctx.sfd[0], &e), 0); + + /* + * main will act as the emitter once both waiter threads are + * blocked and expects to both be awoken upon the ready event. + */ + ctx.main = pthread_self(); + ASSERT_EQ(pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiter_entry1a, &ctx), 0); + ASSERT_EQ(pthread_create(&waiter[1], NULL, waiter_entry1a, &ctx), 0); + + usleep(100000); + ASSERT_EQ(write(ctx.sfd[1], "w", 1), 1); + + ASSERT_EQ(pthread_join(waiter[0], NULL), 0); + ASSERT_EQ(pthread_join(waiter[1], NULL), 0); + + EXPECT_EQ(ctx.count, 2); + + close(ctx.efd[0]); + close(ctx.sfd[0]); + close(ctx.sfd[1]); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN |