Merge tag 'kvm-s390-next-5.18-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux into HEAD

KVM: s390: Changes for 5.18 part1

- add Claudio as Maintainer
- first step to do proper storage key checking
- testcase for missing memop check

4 files changed, 244 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index dce7de7755e6..7903580a48ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 /s390x/memop
 /s390x/resets
 /s390x/sync_regs_test
+/s390x/tprot
 /x86_64/amx_test
 /x86_64/cpuid_test
 /x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 06c3a4602bcc..f9943b96ab3f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_binary_stats_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x = s390x/memop
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/resets
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/tprot
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += demand_paging_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += dirty_log_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index 9f49ead380ab..d19c3ffdea3f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -160,6 +160,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17));   /* Disable AR mode */
 	vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);                  /* Run to sync new state */
 
+	/* Check that the SIDA calls are rejected for non-protected guests */
+	ksmo.gaddr = 0;
+	ksmo.flags = 0;
+	ksmo.size = 8;
+	ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ;
+	ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+	ksmo.sida_offset = 0x1c0;
+	rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "ioctl does not reject SIDA_READ in non-protected mode");
+	ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE;
+	rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "ioctl does not reject SIDA_WRITE in non-protected mode");
+
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c097b9db495e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Test TEST PROTECTION emulation.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2021
+ */
+
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+
+#define PAGE_SHIFT 12
+#define PAGE_SIZE (1 << PAGE_SHIFT)
+#define CR0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE	(1UL << (63 - 38))
+#define CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE	(1UL << (63 - 39))
+
+#define VCPU_ID 1
+
+static __aligned(PAGE_SIZE) uint8_t pages[2][PAGE_SIZE];
+static uint8_t *const page_store_prot = pages[0];
+static uint8_t *const page_fetch_prot = pages[1];
+
+/* Nonzero return value indicates that address not mapped */
+static int set_storage_key(void *addr, uint8_t key)
+{
+	int not_mapped = 0;
+
+	asm volatile (
+		       "lra	%[addr], 0(0,%[addr])\n"
+		"	jz	0f\n"
+		"	llill	%[not_mapped],1\n"
+		"	j	1f\n"
+		"0:	sske	%[key], %[addr]\n"
+		"1:"
+		: [addr] "+&a" (addr), [not_mapped] "+r" (not_mapped)
+		: [key] "r" (key)
+		: "cc"
+	);
+	return -not_mapped;
+}
+
+enum permission {
+	READ_WRITE = 0,
+	READ = 1,
+	RW_PROTECTED = 2,
+	TRANSL_UNAVAIL = 3,
+};
+
+static enum permission test_protection(void *addr, uint8_t key)
+{
+	uint64_t mask;
+
+	asm volatile (
+		       "tprot	%[addr], 0(%[key])\n"
+		"	ipm	%[mask]\n"
+		: [mask] "=r" (mask)
+		: [addr] "Q" (*(char *)addr),
+		  [key] "a" (key)
+		: "cc"
+	);
+
+	return (enum permission)(mask >> 28);
+}
+
+enum stage {
+	STAGE_END,
+	STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE,
+	TEST_SIMPLE,
+	STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
+	TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
+	TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE,
+};
+
+struct test {
+	enum stage stage;
+	void *addr;
+	uint8_t key;
+	enum permission expected;
+} tests[] = {
+	/*
+	 * We perform each test in the array by executing TEST PROTECTION on
+	 * the specified addr with the specified key and checking if the returned
+	 * permissions match the expected value.
+	 * Both guest and host cooperate to set up the required test conditions.
+	 * A central condition is that the page targeted by addr has to be DAT
+	 * protected in the host mappings, in order for KVM to emulate the
+	 * TEST PROTECTION instruction.
+	 * Since the page tables are shared, the host uses mprotect to achieve
+	 * this.
+	 *
+	 * Test resulting in RW_PROTECTED/TRANSL_UNAVAIL will be interpreted
+	 * by SIE, not KVM, but there is no harm in testing them also.
+	 * See Enhanced Suppression-on-Protection Facilities in the
+	 * Interpretive-Execution Mode
+	 */
+	/*
+	 * guest: set storage key of page_store_prot to 1
+	 *        storage key of page_fetch_prot to 9 and enable
+	 *        protection for it
+	 * STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE
+	 * host: write protect both via mprotect
+	 */
+	/* access key 0 matches any storage key -> RW */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_store_prot, 0x00, READ_WRITE },
+	/* access key matches storage key -> RW */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_store_prot, 0x10, READ_WRITE },
+	/* mismatched keys, but no fetch protection -> RO */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_store_prot, 0x20, READ },
+	/* access key 0 matches any storage key -> RW */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_fetch_prot, 0x00, READ_WRITE },
+	/* access key matches storage key -> RW */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_fetch_prot, 0x90, READ_WRITE },
+	/* mismatched keys, fetch protection -> inaccessible */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, page_fetch_prot, 0x10, RW_PROTECTED },
+	/* page 0 not mapped yet -> translation not available */
+	{ TEST_SIMPLE, (void *)0x00, 0x10, TRANSL_UNAVAIL },
+	/*
+	 * host: try to map page 0
+	 * guest: set storage key of page 0 to 9 and enable fetch protection
+	 * STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE
+	 * host: write protect page 0
+	 *       enable fetch protection override
+	 */
+	/* mismatched keys, fetch protection, but override applies -> RO */
+	{ TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE, (void *)0x00, 0x10, READ },
+	/* mismatched keys, fetch protection, override applies to 0-2048 only -> inaccessible */
+	{ TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE, (void *)2049, 0x10, RW_PROTECTED },
+	/*
+	 * host: enable storage protection override
+	 */
+	/* mismatched keys, but override applies (storage key 9) -> RW */
+	{ TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE, page_fetch_prot, 0x10, READ_WRITE },
+	/* mismatched keys, no fetch protection, override doesn't apply -> RO */
+	{ TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE, page_store_prot, 0x20, READ },
+	/* mismatched keys, but override applies (storage key 9) -> RW */
+	{ TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE, (void *)2049, 0x10, READ_WRITE },
+	/* end marker */
+	{ STAGE_END, 0, 0, 0 },
+};
+
+static enum stage perform_next_stage(int *i, bool mapped_0)
+{
+	enum stage stage = tests[*i].stage;
+	enum permission result;
+	bool skip;
+
+	for (; tests[*i].stage == stage; (*i)++) {
+		/*
+		 * Some fetch protection override tests require that page 0
+		 * be mapped, however, when the hosts tries to map that page via
+		 * vm_vaddr_alloc, it may happen that some other page gets mapped
+		 * instead.
+		 * In order to skip these tests we detect this inside the guest
+		 */
+		skip = tests[*i].addr < (void *)4096 &&
+		       tests[*i].expected != TRANSL_UNAVAIL &&
+		       !mapped_0;
+		if (!skip) {
+			result = test_protection(tests[*i].addr, tests[*i].key);
+			GUEST_ASSERT_2(result == tests[*i].expected, *i, result);
+		}
+	}
+	return stage;
+}
+
+static void guest_code(void)
+{
+	bool mapped_0;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(set_storage_key(page_store_prot, 0x10), 0);
+	GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(set_storage_key(page_fetch_prot, 0x98), 0);
+	GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE);
+	GUEST_SYNC(perform_next_stage(&i, false));
+
+	/* Fetch-protection override */
+	mapped_0 = !set_storage_key((void *)0, 0x98);
+	GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+	GUEST_SYNC(perform_next_stage(&i, mapped_0));
+
+	/* Storage-protection override */
+	GUEST_SYNC(perform_next_stage(&i, mapped_0));
+}
+
+#define HOST_SYNC(vmp, stage)							\
+({										\
+	struct kvm_vm *__vm = (vmp);						\
+	struct ucall uc;							\
+	int __stage = (stage);							\
+										\
+	vcpu_run(__vm, VCPU_ID);						\
+	get_ucall(__vm, VCPU_ID, &uc);						\
+	if (uc.cmd == UCALL_ABORT) {						\
+		TEST_FAIL("line %lu: %s, hints: %lu, %lu", uc.args[1],		\
+			  (const char *)uc.args[0], uc.args[2], uc.args[3]);	\
+	}									\
+	ASSERT_EQ(uc.cmd, UCALL_SYNC);						\
+	ASSERT_EQ(uc.args[1], __stage);						\
+})
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct kvm_run *run;
+	vm_vaddr_t guest_0_page;
+
+	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
+	run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+	HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE);
+	mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)pages), PAGE_SIZE * 2, PROT_READ);
+	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_SIMPLE);
+
+	guest_0_page = vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+	if (guest_0_page != 0)
+		print_skip("Did not allocate page at 0 for fetch protection override tests");
+	HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+	if (guest_0_page == 0)
+		mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)0), PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ);
+	run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
+	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+
+	run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
+	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+}