Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec

Steffen Klassert says:

====================
pull request (net): ipsec 2019-01-25

1) Several patches to fix the fallout from the recent
   tree based policy lookup work. From Florian Westphal.

2) Fix VTI for IPCOMP for 'not compressed' IPCOMP packets.
   We need an extra IPIP handler to process these packets
   correctly. From Su Yanjun.

3) Fix validation of template and selector families for
   MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION with ipv4-in-ipv6 packets.
   This can lead to a stack-out-of-bounds because
   flowi4 struct is treated as flowi6 struct.
   Fix from Florian Westphal.

4) Restore the default behaviour of the xfrm set-mark
   in the output path. This was changed accidentally
   when mark setting was extended to the input path.
   From Benedict Wong.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 131 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh
index 8db35b99457c..71d7fdc513c1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh
@@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ KEY_AES=0x0123456789abcdef0123456789012345
 SPI1=0x1
 SPI2=0x2
 
+do_esp_policy() {
+    local ns=$1
+    local me=$2
+    local remote=$3
+    local lnet=$4
+    local rnet=$5
+
+    # to encrypt packets as they go out (includes forwarded packets that need encapsulation)
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src $lnet dst $rnet dir out tmpl src $me dst $remote proto esp mode tunnel priority 100 action allow
+    # to fwd decrypted packets after esp processing:
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src $rnet dst $lnet dir fwd tmpl src $remote dst $me proto esp mode tunnel priority 100 action allow
+}
+
 do_esp() {
     local ns=$1
     local me=$2
@@ -40,10 +53,59 @@ do_esp() {
     ip -net $ns xfrm state add src $remote dst $me proto esp spi $spi_in  enc aes $KEY_AES  auth sha1 $KEY_SHA  mode tunnel sel src $rnet dst $lnet
     ip -net $ns xfrm state add src $me  dst $remote proto esp spi $spi_out enc aes $KEY_AES auth sha1 $KEY_SHA mode tunnel sel src $lnet dst $rnet
 
-    # to encrypt packets as they go out (includes forwarded packets that need encapsulation)
-    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src $lnet dst $rnet dir out tmpl src $me dst $remote proto esp mode tunnel priority 100 action allow
-    # to fwd decrypted packets after esp processing:
-    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src $rnet dst $lnet dir fwd tmpl src $remote dst $me proto esp mode tunnel priority 100 action allow
+    do_esp_policy $ns $me $remote $lnet $rnet
+}
+
+# add policies with different netmasks, to make sure kernel carries
+# the policies contained within new netmask over when search tree is
+# re-built.
+# peer netns that are supposed to be encapsulated via esp have addresses
+# in the 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 subnets, respectively.
+#
+# Adding a policy for '10.0.1.0/23' will make it necessary to
+# alter the prefix of 10.0.1.0 subnet.
+# In case new prefix overlaps with existing node, the node and all
+# policies it carries need to be merged with the existing one(s).
+#
+# Do that here.
+do_overlap()
+{
+    local ns=$1
+
+    # adds new nodes to tree (neither network exists yet in policy database).
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.1.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block
+
+    # adds a new node in the 10.0.0.0/24 tree (dst node exists).
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.2.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block
+
+    # adds a 10.2.0.0/23 node, but for different dst.
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.2.0.0/23 dst 10.0.1.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block
+
+    # dst now overlaps with the 10.0.1.0/24 ESP policy in fwd.
+    # kernel must 'promote' existing one (10.0.0.0/24) to 10.0.0.0/23.
+    # But 10.0.0.0/23 also includes existing 10.0.1.0/24, so that node
+    # also has to be merged too, including source-sorted subtrees.
+    # old:
+    # 10.0.0.0/24 (node 1 in dst tree of the bin)
+    #    10.1.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 1)
+    #    10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 1)
+    # 10.0.1.0/24 (node 2 in dst tree of the bin)
+    #    10.0.2.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 2)
+    #    10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 2)
+    #
+    # The next 'policy add' adds dst '10.0.0.0/23', which means
+    # that dst node 1 and dst node 2 have to be merged including
+    # the sub-tree.  As no duplicates are allowed, policies in
+    # the two '10.0.2.0/24' are also merged.
+    #
+    # after the 'add', internal search tree should look like this:
+    # 10.0.0.0/23 (node in dst tree of bin)
+    #     10.0.2.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node)
+    #     10.1.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node)
+    #     10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node)
+    #
+    # 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.1.0/24 nodes have been merged as 10.0.0.0/23.
+    ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.1.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/23 dir fwd priority 200 action block
 }
 
 do_esp_policy_get_check() {
@@ -160,6 +222,41 @@ check_xfrm() {
 	return $lret
 }
 
+check_exceptions()
+{
+	logpostfix="$1"
+	local lret=0
+
+	# ping to .254 should be excluded from the tunnel (exception is in place).
+	check_xfrm 0 254
+	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+		echo "FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail ($logpostfix)"
+		lret=1
+	else
+		echo "PASS: ping to .254 bypassed ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)"
+	fi
+
+	# ping to .253 should use use ipsec due to direct policy exception.
+	check_xfrm 1 253
+	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+		echo "FAIL: expected ping to .253 to use ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)"
+		lret=1
+	else
+		echo "PASS: direct policy matches ($logpostfix)"
+	fi
+
+	# ping to .2 should use ipsec.
+	check_xfrm 1 2
+	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+		echo "FAIL: expected ping to .2 to use ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)"
+		lret=1
+	else
+		echo "PASS: policy matches ($logpostfix)"
+	fi
+
+	return $lret
+}
+
 #check for needed privileges
 if [ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ];then
 	echo "SKIP: Need root privileges"
@@ -270,33 +367,45 @@ do_exception ns4 10.0.3.10 10.0.3.1 10.0.1.253 10.0.1.240/28
 do_exception ns3 dead:3::1 dead:3::10 dead:2::fd  dead:2:f0::/96
 do_exception ns4 dead:3::10 dead:3::1 dead:1::fd  dead:1:f0::/96
 
-# ping to .254 should now be excluded from the tunnel
-check_xfrm 0 254
+check_exceptions "exceptions"
 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
-	echo "FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail"
 	ret=1
-else
-	echo "PASS: ping to .254 bypassed ipsec tunnel"
 fi
 
-# ping to .253 should use use ipsec due to direct policy exception.
-check_xfrm 1 253
-if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
-	echo "FAIL: expected ping to .253 to use ipsec tunnel"
-	ret=1
-else
-	echo "PASS: direct policy matches"
-fi
+# insert block policies with adjacent/overlapping netmasks
+do_overlap ns3
 
-# ping to .2 should use ipsec.
-check_xfrm 1 2
+check_exceptions "exceptions and block policies"
 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
-	echo "FAIL: expected ping to .2 to use ipsec tunnel"
 	ret=1
-else
-	echo "PASS: policy matches"
 fi
 
+for n in ns3 ns4;do
+	ip -net $n xfrm policy set hthresh4 28 24 hthresh6 126 125
+	sleep $((RANDOM%5))
+done
+
+check_exceptions "exceptions and block policies after hresh changes"
+
+# full flush of policy db, check everything gets freed incl. internal meta data
+ip -net ns3 xfrm policy flush
+
+do_esp_policy ns3 10.0.3.1 10.0.3.10 10.0.1.0/24 10.0.2.0/24
+do_exception ns3 10.0.3.1 10.0.3.10 10.0.2.253 10.0.2.240/28
+
+# move inexact policies to hash table
+ip -net ns3 xfrm policy set hthresh4 16 16
+
+sleep $((RANDOM%5))
+check_exceptions "exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3"
+
+# restore original hthresh settings -- move policies back to tables
+for n in ns3 ns4;do
+	ip -net $n xfrm policy set hthresh4 32 32 hthresh6 128 128
+	sleep $((RANDOM%5))
+done
+check_exceptions "exceptions and block policies after hresh change to normal"
+
 for i in 1 2 3 4;do ip netns del ns$i;done
 
 exit $ret