diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-04-09 17:39:22 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-04-09 17:39:22 -0700 |
commit | 40fc7ad2c8863479f3db34f9a9283b4884cd0e90 (patch) | |
tree | 20d697f61bc6108e7230d629b2cf85ff0e2b094f /tools/testing | |
parent | 690cc86321eb9bcee371710252742fb16fe96824 (diff) | |
parent | bb9562cf5c67813034c96afb50bd21130a504441 (diff) | |
download | linux-40fc7ad2c8863479f3db34f9a9283b4884cd0e90.tar.bz2 |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2020-04-10
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 13 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
a total of 13 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) JIT code emission fixes for riscv and arm32, from Luke Nelson and Xi Wang.
2) Disable vmlinux BTF info if GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT is used, from Slava Bacherikov.
3) Fix oob write in AF_XDP when meta data is used, from Li RongQing.
4) Fix bpf_get_link_xdp_id() handling on single prog when flags are specified,
from Andrey Ignatov.
5) Fix sk_assign() BPF helper for request sockets that can have sk_reuseport
field uninitialized, from Joe Stringer.
6) Fix mprotect() test case for the BPF LSM, from KP Singh.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_info.c | 68 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 4 |
4 files changed, 83 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c index 1e4c258de09d..b17eb2045c1d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c @@ -15,7 +15,10 @@ char *CMD_ARGS[] = {"true", NULL}; -int heap_mprotect(void) +#define GET_PAGE_ADDR(ADDR, PAGE_SIZE) \ + (char *)(((unsigned long) (ADDR + PAGE_SIZE)) & ~(PAGE_SIZE-1)) + +int stack_mprotect(void) { void *buf; long sz; @@ -25,12 +28,9 @@ int heap_mprotect(void) if (sz < 0) return sz; - buf = memalign(sz, 2 * sz); - if (buf == NULL) - return -ENOMEM; - - ret = mprotect(buf, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC); - free(buf); + buf = alloca(sz * 3); + ret = mprotect(GET_PAGE_ADDR(buf, sz), sz, + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC); return ret; } @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ void test_test_lsm(void) skel->bss->monitored_pid = getpid(); - err = heap_mprotect(); - if (CHECK(errno != EPERM, "heap_mprotect", "want errno=EPERM, got %d\n", + err = stack_mprotect(); + if (CHECK(errno != EPERM, "stack_mprotect", "want err=EPERM, got %d\n", errno)) goto close_prog; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_info.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d2d7a283d72f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_info.c @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <linux/if_link.h> +#include <test_progs.h> + +#define IFINDEX_LO 1 + +void test_xdp_info(void) +{ + __u32 len = sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info), duration = 0, prog_id; + const char *file = "./xdp_dummy.o"; + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; + struct bpf_object *obj; + int err, prog_fd; + + /* Get prog_id for XDP_ATTACHED_NONE mode */ + + err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &prog_id, 0); + if (CHECK(err, "get_xdp_none", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + return; + if (CHECK(prog_id, "prog_id_none", "unexpected prog_id=%u\n", prog_id)) + return; + + err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &prog_id, XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE); + if (CHECK(err, "get_xdp_none_skb", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + return; + if (CHECK(prog_id, "prog_id_none_skb", "unexpected prog_id=%u\n", + prog_id)) + return; + + /* Setup prog */ + + err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd); + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) + return; + + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &info, &len); + if (CHECK(err, "get_prog_info", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + goto out_close; + + err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd, XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE); + if (CHECK(err, "set_xdp_skb", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + goto out_close; + + /* Get prog_id for single prog mode */ + + err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &prog_id, 0); + if (CHECK(err, "get_xdp", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + goto out; + if (CHECK(prog_id != info.id, "prog_id", "prog_id not available\n")) + goto out; + + err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &prog_id, XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE); + if (CHECK(err, "get_xdp_skb", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + goto out; + if (CHECK(prog_id != info.id, "prog_id_skb", "prog_id not available\n")) + goto out; + + err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &prog_id, XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE); + if (CHECK(err, "get_xdp_drv", "errno=%d\n", errno)) + goto out; + if (CHECK(prog_id, "prog_id_drv", "unexpected prog_id=%u\n", prog_id)) + goto out; + +out: + bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, -1, 0); +out_close: + bpf_object__close(obj); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c index a4e3c223028d..b4598d4bc4f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c @@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, return ret; __u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; - int is_heap = 0; + int is_stack = 0; - is_heap = (vma->vm_start >= vma->vm_mm->start_brk && - vma->vm_end <= vma->vm_mm->brk); + is_stack = (vma->vm_start <= vma->vm_mm->start_stack && + vma->vm_end >= vma->vm_mm->start_stack); - if (is_heap && monitored_pid == pid) { + if (is_stack && monitored_pid == pid) { mprotect_count++; ret = -EPERM; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 4d0d09574bf4..a253a064e6e0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ .result = REJECT }, { - "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test1", + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test1", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ .result = ACCEPT }, { - "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2", + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test2", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), |