summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>2022-06-16 18:20:37 +0200
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2022-06-16 21:49:05 +0200
commit5e0b0a4c52d30bb09659446f40b77a692361600d (patch)
treeee6b26642923706daf2a48c0b96c083977ffbcfd /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
parentff672c67ee7635ca1e28fb13729e8ef0d1f08ce5 (diff)
downloadlinux-5e0b0a4c52d30bb09659446f40b77a692361600d.tar.bz2
selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack
Cover the case when tail call count needs to be passed from BPF function to BPF function, and the caller has data on stack. Specifically when the size of data allocated on BPF stack is not a multiple on 8. Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220616162037.535469-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c55
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index c4da87ec3ba4..19c70880cfb3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -831,6 +831,59 @@ out:
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf6.skel.h"
+
+/* Tail call counting works even when there is data on stack which is
+ * not aligned to 8 bytes.
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_6(void)
+{
+ struct tailcall_bpf2bpf6 *obj;
+ int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+
+ obj = tailcall_bpf2bpf6__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(obj, "open and load"))
+ return;
+
+ main_fd = bpf_program__fd(obj->progs.entry);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(main_fd, 0, "entry prog fd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(obj->maps.jmp_table);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "jmp_table map fd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(obj->progs.classifier_0);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "classifier_0 prog fd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ i = 0;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &prog_fd, BPF_ANY);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "jmp_table map update"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(main_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "entry prog test run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "tailcall retval");
+
+ data_fd = bpf_map__fd(obj->maps.bss);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "bss map fd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ i = 0;
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bss map lookup");
+ ASSERT_EQ(val, 1, "done flag is set");
+
+out:
+ tailcall_bpf2bpf6__destroy(obj);
+}
+
void test_tailcalls(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -855,4 +908,6 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false);
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5"))
test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true);
+ if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_6"))
+ test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_6();
}