summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2021-05-24 20:59:32 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2021-05-25 17:32:35 -0700
commitbad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16 (patch)
treeb2739a3cb481bc0f9ea4745ba21393e02924a32e /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
parent5981881d21dff612abf8fce484f8efa67f49aae4 (diff)
downloadlinux-bad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16.tar.bz2
selftests/bpf: Turn on libbpf 1.0 mode and fix all IS_ERR checks
Turn ony libbpf 1.0 mode. Fix all the explicit IS_ERR checks that now will be broken because libbpf returns NULL on error (and sets errno). Fix ASSERT_OK_PTR and ASSERT_ERR_PTR to work for both old mode and new modes and use them throughout selftests. This is trivial to do by using libbpf_get_error() API that all libbpf users are supposed to use, instead of IS_ERR checks. A bunch of checks also did explicit -1 comparison for various fd-returning APIs. Such checks are replaced with >= 0 or < 0 cases. There were also few misuses of bpf_object__find_map_by_name() in test_maps. Those are fixed in this patch as well. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210525035935.1461796-3-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
index c5fb191874ac..41720a62c4fa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void test_raw_tp_test_run(void)
/* invalid cpu ID should fail with ENXIO */
opts.cpu = 0xffffffff;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts);
- CHECK(err != -1 || errno != ENXIO,
+ CHECK(err >= 0 || errno != ENXIO,
"test_run_opts_fail",
"should failed with ENXIO\n");
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void test_raw_tp_test_run(void)
opts.cpu = 1;
opts.flags = 0;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts);
- CHECK(err != -1 || errno != EINVAL,
+ CHECK(err >= 0 || errno != EINVAL,
"test_run_opts_fail",
"should failed with EINVAL\n");