summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/power/cpupower
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2014-04-22 10:42:05 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2014-05-01 01:15:32 +0200
commitdec102aa9ac112d66133314815d20233c96ad749 (patch)
tree4cea53753fff42a1afa668e88ed070d5e68c8976 /tools/power/cpupower
parente5eaa445b0dc90d99eab6239841a982e5df2682f (diff)
downloadlinux-dec102aa9ac112d66133314815d20233c96ad749.tar.bz2
cpufreq: Make linux-pm@vger.kernel.org official mailing list
There has been confusion all the time about which mailing list to follow for cpufreq activities, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org or cpufreq@vger.kernel.org. Since patches sent to cpufreq@vger.kernel.org don't go to Patchwork which is a maintenance workflow problem, make linux-pm@vger.kernel.org the official mailing list for cpufreq stuff and remove all references of cpufreq@vger.kernel.org from kernel source. Later, we can request that the list be dropped entirely. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/power/cpupower')
-rw-r--r--tools/power/cpupower/Makefile2
-rw-r--r--tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile b/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile
index cbfec92af327..3651db7eda23 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ LIB_MAJ= 0.0.0
LIB_MIN= 0
PACKAGE = cpupower
-PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
+PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
LANGUAGES = de fr it cs pt
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c b/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c
index 0f10b81e3322..5224ee5b392d 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
* 5.) if the third value, "diff_pmtmr", changes between 2. and 4., the
* TSC-based delay routine on the Linux kernel does not correctly
* handle the cpufreq transition. Please report this to
- * cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
+ * linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>