summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>2017-01-22 17:11:22 -0800
committerArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>2017-01-26 11:42:56 -0300
commit94e5adece8b37a23d99fb1f8a5de94b23194f387 (patch)
tree36bfbdfdb6509124a80cf23c1bd436536b603a3d /tools/lib
parentd1d0e29cb7d03a6019caa125e4c0288366a4f359 (diff)
downloadlinux-94e5adece8b37a23d99fb1f8a5de94b23194f387.tar.bz2
tools lib bpf: Fix map offsets in relocation
Commit 4708bbda5cb2 ("tools lib bpf: Fix maps resolution") attempted to fix map resolution by identifying the number of symbols that point to maps, and using this number to resolve each of the maps. However, during relocation the original definition of the map size was still in use. For up to two maps, the calculation was correct if there was a small difference in size between the map definition in libbpf and the one that the client library uses. However if the difference was large, particularly if more than two maps were used in the BPF program, the relocation would fail. For example, when using a map definition with size 28, with three maps, map relocation would count: (sym_offset / sizeof(struct bpf_map_def) => map_idx) (0 / 16 => 0), ie map_idx = 0 (28 / 16 => 1), ie map_idx = 1 (56 / 16 => 3), ie map_idx = 3 So, libbpf reports: libbpf: bpf relocation: map_idx 3 large than 2 Fix map relocation by checking the exact offset of maps when doing relocation. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org> [Allow different map size in an object] Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4708bbda5cb2 ("tools lib bpf: Fix maps resolution") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170123011128.26534-2-joe@ovn.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib')
-rw-r--r--tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c15
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 84e6b35da4bd..671d5ad07cf1 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static int
bpf_program__collect_reloc(struct bpf_program *prog,
size_t nr_maps, GElf_Shdr *shdr,
Elf_Data *data, Elf_Data *symbols,
- int maps_shndx)
+ int maps_shndx, struct bpf_map *maps)
{
int i, nrels;
@@ -829,7 +829,15 @@ bpf_program__collect_reloc(struct bpf_program *prog,
return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
}
- map_idx = sym.st_value / sizeof(struct bpf_map_def);
+ /* TODO: 'maps' is sorted. We can use bsearch to make it faster. */
+ for (map_idx = 0; map_idx < nr_maps; map_idx++) {
+ if (maps[map_idx].offset == sym.st_value) {
+ pr_debug("relocation: find map %zd (%s) for insn %u\n",
+ map_idx, maps[map_idx].name, insn_idx);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
if (map_idx >= nr_maps) {
pr_warning("bpf relocation: map_idx %d large than %d\n",
(int)map_idx, (int)nr_maps - 1);
@@ -953,7 +961,8 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_reloc(struct bpf_object *obj)
err = bpf_program__collect_reloc(prog, nr_maps,
shdr, data,
obj->efile.symbols,
- obj->efile.maps_shndx);
+ obj->efile.maps_shndx,
+ obj->maps);
if (err)
return err;
}