summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sound
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>2019-10-02 14:22:40 +0900
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2019-10-03 14:36:01 +0100
commit7ce6088f60624805a8d3127185e2830e299849f1 (patch)
tree06c7b6a15e2f8cc16c9d66d1041b2cdd196e9336 /sound
parent4dc0e7df62839d052476de0f8447f29f857cecda (diff)
downloadlinux-7ce6088f60624805a8d3127185e2830e299849f1.tar.bz2
ASoC: soc-core: remove soc_remove_dai_links()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) which is paired function of snd_soc_instantiate_card() (A) is calling soc_remove_dai_links() (*) to remove card related resources, but it is breaking add/remove balance (B)(b)(C)(c)(D)(d), in other words these should be called from soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) from balance point of view. More headacke is that it is using original removing method for dai_link even though we already have snd_soc_remove_dai_link() which is the function for it (d). This patch removes snd_soc_remove_dai_links() and balance up code. static void soc_remove_dai_links(...) { ... (b) soc_remove_link_dais(card); (c) soc_remove_link_components(card); for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) { ... /* it should use snd_soc_remove_dai_link() here */ (d) list_del(&link->list); } } (a) static int soc_cleanup_card_resources(...) { ... /* remove and free each DAI */ (*) soc_remove_dai_links(card); ... } (A) static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card) { ... /* add predefined DAI links to the list */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) (B) snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... /* probe all components used by DAI links on this card */ (C) ret = soc_probe_link_components(card); ... /* probe all DAI links on this card */ (D) ret = soc_probe_link_dais(card); ... } Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zl7bu1r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound')
-rw-r--r--sound/soc/soc-core.c26
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index b16a94228091..a34000d08856 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1275,23 +1275,6 @@ static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card)
return 0;
}
-static void soc_remove_dai_links(struct snd_soc_card *card)
-{
- struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
-
- soc_remove_link_dais(card);
-
- soc_remove_link_components(card);
-
- for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) {
- if (link->dobj.type == SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK)
- dev_warn(card->dev, "Topology forgot to remove link %s?\n",
- link->name);
-
- list_del(&link->list);
- }
-}
-
static int soc_init_dai_link(struct snd_soc_card *card,
struct snd_soc_dai_link *link)
{
@@ -1924,6 +1907,8 @@ match:
static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
+ struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
+
/* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */
if (card->snd_card) {
snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
@@ -1931,7 +1916,12 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
}
/* remove and free each DAI */
- soc_remove_dai_links(card);
+ soc_remove_link_dais(card);
+ soc_remove_link_components(card);
+
+ for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
+ snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);
+
soc_remove_pcm_runtimes(card);
/* remove auxiliary devices */