diff options
| author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> | 2008-04-30 00:52:42 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2008-04-30 08:29:34 -0700 |
| commit | 3b5e9e53c6f31b5a5a0f5c43707503c62bdefa46 (patch) | |
| tree | 1244b7cf2755c06a8a793149ce4717e4a1311218 /security/smack | |
| parent | 9e3bd6c3fb2334be171e69b432039cd18bce4458 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3b5e9e53c6f31b5a5a0f5c43707503c62bdefa46.tar.bz2 | |
signals: cleanup security_task_kill() usage/implementation
Every implementation of ->task_kill() does nothing when the signal comes from
the kernel. This is correct, but means that check_kill_permission() should
call security_task_kill() only for SI_FROMUSER() case, and we can remove the
same check from ->task_kill() implementations.
(sadly, check_kill_permission() is the last user of signal->session/__session
but we can't s/task_session_nr/task_session/ here).
NOTE: Eric W. Biederman pointed out cap_task_kill() should die, and I think
he is very right.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: David Quigley <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/smack')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c index fe0ae1bf1650..b5c8f9237008 100644 --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c @@ -1131,15 +1131,6 @@ static int smack_task_kill(struct task_struct *p, struct siginfo *info, int sig, u32 secid) { /* - * Special cases where signals really ought to go through - * in spite of policy. Stephen Smalley suggests it may - * make sense to change the caller so that it doesn't - * bother with the LSM hook in these cases. - */ - if (info != SEND_SIG_NOINFO && - (is_si_special(info) || SI_FROMKERNEL(info))) - return 0; - /* * Sending a signal requires that the sender * can write the receiver. */ |