summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>2018-03-15 17:12:40 +0100
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2018-03-19 15:23:03 +0100
commita84d1169164b274f13b97a23ff235c000efe3b49 (patch)
treee6b54934ee5ccc0b53804500a4398ca31d060b8d /scripts
parent92af4dcb4e1c5f58dc337bc97bdffd4e853dbc93 (diff)
downloadlinux-a84d1169164b274f13b97a23ff235c000efe3b49.tar.bz2
y2038: Introduce struct __kernel_old_timeval
Dealing with 'struct timeval' users in the y2038 series is a bit tricky: We have two definitions of timeval that are visible to user space, one comes from glibc (or some other C library), the other comes from linux/time.h. The kernel copy is what we want to be used for a number of structures defined by the kernel itself, e.g. elf_prstatus (used it core dumps), sysinfo and rusage (used in system calls). These generally tend to be used for passing time intervals rather than absolute (epoch-based) times, so they do not suffer from the y2038 overflow. Some of them could be changed to use 64-bit timestamps by creating new system calls, others like the core files cannot easily be changed. An application using these interfaces likely also uses gettimeofday() or other interfaces that use absolute times, and pass 'struct timeval' pointers directly into kernel interfaces, so glibc must redefine their timeval based on a 64-bit time_t when they introduce their y2038-safe interfaces. The only reasonable way forward I see is to remove the 'timeval' definion from the kernel's uapi headers, and change the interfaces that we do not want to (or cannot) duplicate for 64-bit times to use a new __kernel_old_timeval definition instead. This type should be avoided for all new interfaces (those can use 64-bit nanoseconds, or the 64-bit version of timespec instead), and should be used with great care when converting existing interfaces from timeval, to be sure they don't suffer from the y2038 overflow, and only with consensus for the particular user that using __kernel_old_timeval is better than moving to a 64-bit based interface. The structure name is intentionally chosen to not conflict with user space types, and to be ugly enough to discourage its use. Note that ioctl based interfaces that pass a bare 'timeval' pointer cannot change to '__kernel_old_timeval' because the user space source code refers to 'timeval' instead, and we don't want to modify the user space sources if possible. However, any application that relies on a structure to contain an embedded 'timeval' (e.g. by passing a pointer to the member into a function call that expects a timeval pointer) is broken when that structure gets converted to __kernel_old_timeval. I don't see any way around that, and we have to rely on the compiler to produce a warning or compile failure that will alert users when they recompile their sources against a new libc. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315161739.576085-1-arnd@arndb.de
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions