diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-12-04 12:07:10 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-12-04 12:07:10 -0500 |
commit | d671965b54937fd2ae4074afa68dc302a6326849 (patch) | |
tree | 2f69c620c6aabf23edf7720137bf4fb3148f0c95 /samples/bpf | |
parent | f4d4c49b0c26fecdbf670574c8823fb4b300a892 (diff) | |
parent | 6720f1084c066a5ba051a250e9d5d8c2ad4f554c (diff) | |
download | linux-d671965b54937fd2ae4074afa68dc302a6326849.tar.bz2 |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-03
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Addition of a software model for BPF offloads in order to ease
testing code changes in that area and make semantics more clear.
This is implemented in a new driver called netdevsim, which can
later also be extended for other offloads. SR-IOV support is added
as well to netdevsim. BPF kernel selftests for offloading are
added so we can track basic functionality as well as exercising
all corner cases around BPF offloading, from Jakub.
2) Today drivers have to drop the reference on BPF progs they hold
due to XDP on device teardown themselves. Change this in order
to make XDP handling inside the drivers less error prone, and
move disabling XDP to the core instead, also from Jakub.
3) Misc set of BPF verifier improvements and cleanups as preparatory
work for upcoming BPF-to-BPF calls. Among others, this set also
improves liveness marking such that pruning can be slightly more
effective. Register and stack liveness information is now included
in the verifier log as well, from Alexei.
4) nfp JIT improvements in order to identify load/store sequences in
the BPF prog e.g. coming from memcpy lowering and optimizing them
through the NPU's command push pull (CPP) instruction, from Jiong.
5) Cleanups to test_cgrp2_attach2.c BPF sample code in oder to remove
bpf_prog_attach() magic values and replacing them with actual proper
attach flag instead, from David.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/bpf')
-rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c index 3e8232cc04a8..1af412ec6007 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c +++ b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach2.c @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static int test_foo_bar(void) if (join_cgroup(FOO)) goto err; - if (bpf_prog_attach(drop_prog, foo, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(drop_prog, foo, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to /foo"); goto err; } @@ -97,7 +98,8 @@ static int test_foo_bar(void) printf("Attached DROP prog. This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...\n"); assert(system(PING_CMD) != 0); - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to /foo/bar"); goto err; } @@ -114,7 +116,8 @@ static int test_foo_bar(void) "This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...\n"); assert(system(PING_CMD) != 0); - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to /foo/bar"); goto err; } @@ -128,7 +131,8 @@ static int test_foo_bar(void) "This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should pass...\n"); assert(system(PING_CMD) == 0); - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to /foo/bar"); goto err; } @@ -161,13 +165,15 @@ static int test_foo_bar(void) goto err; } - if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, bar, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { errno = 0; log_err("Unexpected success attaching overridable prog to /foo/bar"); goto err; } - if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, foo, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog, foo, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { errno = 0; log_err("Unexpected success attaching overridable prog to /foo"); goto err; @@ -273,27 +279,33 @@ static int test_multiprog(void) if (join_cgroup("/cg1/cg2/cg3/cg4/cg5")) goto err; - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[0], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 2)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[0], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI)) { log_err("Attaching prog to cg1"); goto err; } - if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[0], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 2)) { + if (!bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[0], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI)) { log_err("Unexpected success attaching the same prog to cg1"); goto err; } - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[1], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 2)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[1], cg1, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI)) { log_err("Attaching prog2 to cg1"); goto err; } - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[2], cg2, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[2], cg2, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to cg2"); goto err; } - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[3], cg3, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 2)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[3], cg3, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI)) { log_err("Attaching prog to cg3"); goto err; } - if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[4], cg4, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 1)) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(allow_prog[4], cg4, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE)) { log_err("Attaching prog to cg4"); goto err; } |