diff options
author | Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> | 2013-08-28 23:25:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2013-08-29 16:19:42 -0400 |
commit | 5d261913ca3daf6c2d21d38924235667b3d07c40 (patch) | |
tree | f15af2dea3316393cea047c637f434aa04db7726 /net | |
parent | aa9d85605f5ab070b64842b3eba797cf81698ae1 (diff) | |
download | linux-5d261913ca3daf6c2d21d38924235667b3d07c40.tar.bz2 |
net: add lower_dev_list to net_device and make a full mesh
This patch adds lower_dev_list list_head to net_device, which is the same
as upper_dev_list, only for lower devices, and begins to use it in the same
way as the upper list.
It also changes the way the whole adjacent device lists work - now they
contain *all* of upper/lower devices, not only the first level. The first
level devices are distinguished by the bool neighbour field in
netdev_adjacent, also added by this patch.
There are cases when a device can be added several times to the adjacent
list, the simplest would be:
/---- eth0.10 ---\
eth0- --- bond0
\---- eth0.20 ---/
where both bond0 and eth0 'see' each other in the adjacent lists two times.
To avoid duplication of netdev_adjacent structures ref_nr is being kept as
the number of times the device was added to the list.
The 'full view' is achieved by adding, on link creation, all of the
upper_dev's upper_dev_list devices as upper devices to all of the
lower_dev's lower_dev_list devices (and to the lower_dev itself), and vice
versa. On unlink they are removed using the same logic.
I've tested it with thousands vlans/bonds/bridges, everything works ok and
no observable lags even on a huge number of interfaces.
Memory footprint for 128 devices interconnected with each other via both
upper and lower (which is impossible, but for the comparison) lists would be:
128*128*2*sizeof(netdev_adjacent) = 1.5MB
but in the real world we usualy have at most several devices with slaves
and a lot of vlans, so the footprint will be much lower.
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r-- | net/core/dev.c | 285 |
1 files changed, 258 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 5072e2c1a072..2aa914eee057 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -4369,7 +4369,16 @@ softnet_break: struct netdev_adjacent { struct net_device *dev; + + /* upper master flag, there can only be one master device per list */ bool master; + + /* indicates that this dev is our first-level lower/upper device */ + bool neighbour; + + /* counter for the number of times this device was added to us */ + u16 ref_nr; + struct list_head list; struct rcu_head rcu; struct list_head search_list; @@ -4408,18 +4417,34 @@ static bool __netdev_search_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev, return ret; } -static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_upper(struct net_device *dev, - struct net_device *upper_dev) +static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *adj_dev, + bool upper) { - struct netdev_adjacent *upper; + struct netdev_adjacent *adj; + struct list_head *dev_list; - list_for_each_entry(upper, &dev->upper_dev_list, list) { - if (upper->dev == upper_dev) - return upper; + dev_list = upper ? &dev->upper_dev_list : &dev->lower_dev_list; + + list_for_each_entry(adj, dev_list, list) { + if (adj->dev == adj_dev) + return adj; } return NULL; } +static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_upper(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *udev) +{ + return __netdev_find_adj(dev, udev, true); +} + +static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_lower(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *ldev) +{ + return __netdev_find_adj(dev, ldev, false); +} + /** * netdev_has_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to an upper device * @dev: device @@ -4496,10 +4521,149 @@ struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(struct net_device *dev) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu); +static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *adj_dev, + bool neighbour, bool master, + bool upper) +{ + struct netdev_adjacent *adj; + + adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, upper); + + if (adj) { + BUG_ON(neighbour); + adj->ref_nr++; + return 0; + } + + adj = kmalloc(sizeof(*adj), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!adj) + return -ENOMEM; + + adj->dev = adj_dev; + adj->master = master; + adj->neighbour = neighbour; + adj->ref_nr = 1; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adj->search_list); + + dev_hold(adj_dev); + pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of %s link added from %s to %s\n", + adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name, + adj_dev->name); + + if (!upper) { + list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->lower_dev_list); + return 0; + } + + /* Ensure that master upper link is always the first item in list. */ + if (master) + list_add_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); + else + list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); + + return 0; +} + +static inline int __netdev_upper_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *udev, + bool master, bool neighbour) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, neighbour, master, + true); +} + +static inline int __netdev_lower_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *ldev, + bool neighbour) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, false, + false); +} + +void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *adj_dev, bool upper) +{ + struct netdev_adjacent *adj; + + if (upper) + adj = __netdev_find_upper(dev, adj_dev); + else + adj = __netdev_find_lower(dev, adj_dev); + + if (!adj) + BUG(); + + if (adj->ref_nr > 1) { + adj->ref_nr--; + return; + } + + list_del_rcu(&adj->list); + pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because of %s link removed from %s to %s\n", + adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name, + adj_dev->name); + dev_put(adj_dev); + kfree_rcu(adj, rcu); +} + +static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *udev) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true); +} + +static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *ldev) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false); +} + +int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *upper_dev, + bool master, bool neighbour) +{ + int ret; + + ret = __netdev_upper_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, master, neighbour); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = __netdev_lower_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, neighbour); + if (ret) { + __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev); + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *udev) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, false, false); +} + +static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *udev, + bool master) +{ + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, master, true); +} + +void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev, + struct net_device *upper_dev) +{ + __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev); + __netdev_lower_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev); +} + + static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *upper_dev, bool master) { - struct netdev_adjacent *upper; + struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j, *to_i, *to_j; + int ret = 0; ASSERT_RTNL(); @@ -4516,22 +4680,76 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev, if (master && netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev)) return -EBUSY; - upper = kmalloc(sizeof(*upper), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!upper) - return -ENOMEM; + ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(dev, upper_dev, master); + if (ret) + return ret; - upper->dev = upper_dev; - upper->master = master; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&upper->search_list); + /* Now that we linked these devs, make all the upper_dev's + * upper_dev_list visible to every dev's lower_dev_list and vice + * versa, and don't forget the devices itself. All of these + * links are non-neighbours. + */ + list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry(j, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) { + ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev); + if (ret) + goto rollback_mesh; + } + } + + /* add dev to every upper_dev's upper device */ + list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) { + ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev); + if (ret) + goto rollback_upper_mesh; + } + + /* add upper_dev to every dev's lower device */ + list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) { + ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev); + if (ret) + goto rollback_lower_mesh; + } - /* Ensure that master upper link is always the first item in list. */ - if (master) - list_add_rcu(&upper->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); - else - list_add_tail_rcu(&upper->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); - dev_hold(upper_dev); call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev); return 0; + +rollback_lower_mesh: + to_i = i; + list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) { + if (i == to_i) + break; + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev); + } + + i = NULL; + +rollback_upper_mesh: + to_i = i; + list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) { + if (i == to_i) + break; + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev); + } + + i = j = NULL; + +rollback_mesh: + to_i = i; + to_j = j; + list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) { + if (i == to_i && j == to_j) + break; + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev); + } + if (i == to_i) + break; + } + + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev); + + return ret; } /** @@ -4580,16 +4798,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_link); void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *upper_dev) { - struct netdev_adjacent *upper; - + struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j; ASSERT_RTNL(); - upper = __netdev_find_upper(dev, upper_dev); - if (!upper) - return; - list_del_rcu(&upper->list); - dev_put(upper_dev); - kfree_rcu(upper, rcu); + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev); + + /* Here is the tricky part. We must remove all dev's lower + * devices from all upper_dev's upper devices and vice + * versa, to maintain the graph relationship. + */ + list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) + list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev); + + /* remove also the devices itself from lower/upper device + * list + */ + list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev); + + list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) + __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev); + call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_dev_unlink); @@ -5850,6 +6080,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->unreg_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->link_watch_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->upper_dev_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->lower_dev_list); dev->priv_flags = IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE; setup(dev); |