diff options
author | Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com> | 2011-06-30 08:32:41 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> | 2011-07-05 14:42:36 -0400 |
commit | c10841ca722a0bc960dc541c51582773f9a24f98 (patch) | |
tree | f1e5901db0a530cfd4008f718a908a86bddcb333 /net/wireless/nl80211.c | |
parent | 37000b305bff81bb1ee2f7f37b1319b670a08f76 (diff) | |
download | linux-c10841ca722a0bc960dc541c51582773f9a24f98.tar.bz2 |
cfg80211: fix deadlock with rfkill/sched_scan by adding new mutex
There was a deadlock when rfkill-blocking a wireless interface,
because we were locking the rdev mutex on NETDEV_GOING_DOWN to stop
sched_scans that were eventually running. The rfkill block code was
already holding a mutex under rdev:
kernel: =======================================================
kernel: [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
kernel: 3.0.0-rc1-00049-g1fa7b6a #57
kernel: -------------------------------------------------------
kernel: kworker/0:1/4525 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: (&rdev->mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8164c831>] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x131/0x5b0
kernel:
kernel: but task is already holding lock:
kernel: (&rdev->devlist_mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8164dcef>] cfg80211_rfkill_set_block+0x4f/0xa0
kernel:
kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock.
To fix this, add a new mutex specifically for sched_scan, to protect
the sched_scan_req element in the rdev struct, instead of using the
global rdev mutex.
Reported-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/wireless/nl80211.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/wireless/nl80211.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c index f07602d7bf68..cea338150d05 100644 --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -3461,9 +3461,6 @@ static int nl80211_start_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, if (!is_valid_ie_attr(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_IE])) return -EINVAL; - if (rdev->sched_scan_req) - return -EINPROGRESS; - if (!info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_INTERVAL]) return -EINVAL; @@ -3502,12 +3499,21 @@ static int nl80211_start_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, if (ie_len > wiphy->max_scan_ie_len) return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&rdev->sched_scan_mtx); + + if (rdev->sched_scan_req) { + err = -EINPROGRESS; + goto out; + } + request = kzalloc(sizeof(*request) + sizeof(*request->ssids) * n_ssids + sizeof(*request->channels) * n_channels + ie_len, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!request) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!request) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } if (n_ssids) request->ssids = (void *)&request->channels[n_channels]; @@ -3605,6 +3611,7 @@ static int nl80211_start_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, out_free: kfree(request); out: + mutex_unlock(&rdev->sched_scan_mtx); return err; } @@ -3612,12 +3619,17 @@ static int nl80211_stop_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = info->user_ptr[0]; + int err; if (!(rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SCAN) || !rdev->ops->sched_scan_stop) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - return __cfg80211_stop_sched_scan(rdev, false); + mutex_lock(&rdev->sched_scan_mtx); + err = __cfg80211_stop_sched_scan(rdev, false); + mutex_unlock(&rdev->sched_scan_mtx); + + return err; } static int nl80211_send_bss(struct sk_buff *msg, u32 pid, u32 seq, int flags, |