summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>2019-01-11 15:36:40 -0500
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>2019-02-06 15:37:14 -0500
commit95503d295ad6af20f09efff193e085481a962fd2 (patch)
treea580f60a4a517c73575705c1745de208840f1c43 /net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
parent66c898caefd346a88fbef242eb7892fd959308f6 (diff)
downloadlinux-95503d295ad6af20f09efff193e085481a962fd2.tar.bz2
svcrpc: fix unlikely races preventing queueing of sockets
In the rpc server, When something happens that might be reason to wake up a thread to do something, what we do is - modify xpt_flags, sk_sock->flags, xpt_reserved, or xpt_nr_rqsts to indicate the new situation - call svc_xprt_enqueue() to decide whether to wake up a thread. svc_xprt_enqueue may require multiple conditions to be true before queueing up a thread to handle the xprt. In the SMP case, one of the other CPU's may have set another required condition, and in that case, although both CPUs run svc_xprt_enqueue(), it's possible that neither call sees the writes done by the other CPU in time, and neither one recognizes that all the required conditions have been set. A socket could therefore be ignored indefinitely. Add memory barries to ensure that any svc_xprt_enqueue() call will always see the conditions changed by other CPUs before deciding to ignore a socket. I've never seen this race reported. In the unlikely event it happens, another event will usually come along and the problem will fix itself. So I don't think this is worth backporting to stable. Chuck tried this patch and said "I don't see any performance regressions, but my server has only a single last-level CPU cache." Tested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c')
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c12
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index a2435d3811a9..61530b1b7754 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static void svc_xprt_release_slot(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
struct svc_xprt *xprt = rqstp->rq_xprt;
if (test_and_clear_bit(RQ_DATA, &rqstp->rq_flags)) {
atomic_dec(&xprt->xpt_nr_rqsts);
+ smp_wmb(); /* See smp_rmb() in svc_xprt_ready() */
svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
}
}
@@ -365,6 +366,15 @@ static bool svc_xprt_ready(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
{
unsigned long xpt_flags;
+ /*
+ * If another cpu has recently updated xpt_flags,
+ * sk_sock->flags, xpt_reserved, or xpt_nr_rqsts, we need to
+ * know about it; otherwise it's possible that both that cpu and
+ * this one could call svc_xprt_enqueue() without either
+ * svc_xprt_enqueue() recognizing that the conditions below
+ * are satisfied, and we could stall indefinitely:
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
xpt_flags = READ_ONCE(xprt->xpt_flags);
if (xpt_flags & (BIT(XPT_CONN) | BIT(XPT_CLOSE)))
@@ -479,7 +489,7 @@ void svc_reserve(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, int space)
if (xprt && space < rqstp->rq_reserved) {
atomic_sub((rqstp->rq_reserved - space), &xprt->xpt_reserved);
rqstp->rq_reserved = space;
-
+ smp_wmb(); /* See smp_rmb() in svc_xprt_ready() */
svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
}
}