summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rxrpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>2007-07-26 10:41:07 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2007-07-26 11:35:17 -0700
commit098284020c47c1212d211e39ae2b41c21182e056 (patch)
treef82e03b01a567a536f2f7b5c59671de2cf1f7dc2 /net/rxrpc
parenta1cdd4a64f6ce15a1e81759ef99eed3a91f9acbe (diff)
downloadlinux-098284020c47c1212d211e39ae2b41c21182e056.tar.bz2
make timerfd return a u64 and fix the __put_user
Davi fixed a missing cast in the __put_user(), that was making timerfd return a single byte instead of the full value. Talking with Michael about the timerfd man page, we think it'd be better to use a u64 for the returned value, to align it with the eventfd implementation. This is an ABI change. The timerfd code is new in 2.6.22 and if we merge this into 2.6.23 then we should also merge it into 2.6.22.x. That will leave a few early 2.6.22 kernels out in the wild which might misbehave when a future timerfd-enabled glibc is run on them. mtk says: The difference would be that read() will only return 4 bytes, while the application will expect 8. If the application is checking the size of returned value, as it should, then it will be able to detect the problem (it could even be sophisticated enough to know that if this is a 4-byte return, then it is running on an old 2.6.22 kernel). If the application is not checking the return from read(), then its 8-byte buffer will not be filled -- the contents of the last 4 bytes will be undefined, so the u64 value as a whole will be junk. Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Cc: Davi Arnaut <davi@haxent.com.br> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions