diff options
author | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> | 2018-09-27 15:13:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> | 2018-09-28 10:32:49 +0100 |
commit | 0099dc589bfa7caf6f2608c4cbc1181cfee22b0c (patch) | |
tree | fd071d7aab3762ba2ab377892cb4c250923d50b8 /net/rxrpc/conn_object.c | |
parent | 403fc2a138457f1071b186786a7589ef7382c8bc (diff) | |
download | linux-0099dc589bfa7caf6f2608c4cbc1181cfee22b0c.tar.bz2 |
rxrpc: Make service call handling more robust
Make the following changes to improve the robustness of the code that sets
up a new service call:
(1) Cache the rxrpc_sock struct obtained in rxrpc_data_ready() to do a
service ID check and pass that along to rxrpc_new_incoming_call().
This means that I can remove the check from rxrpc_new_incoming_call()
without the need to worry about the socket attached to the local
endpoint getting replaced - which would invalidate the check.
(2) Cache the rxrpc_peer struct, thereby allowing the peer search to be
done once. The peer is passed to rxrpc_new_incoming_call(), thereby
saving the need to repeat the search.
This also reduces the possibility of rxrpc_publish_service_conn()
BUG()'ing due to the detection of a duplicate connection, despite the
initial search done by rxrpc_find_connection_rcu() having turned up
nothing.
This BUG() shouldn't ever get hit since rxrpc_data_ready() *should* be
non-reentrant and the result of the initial search should still hold
true, but it has proven possible to hit.
I *think* this may be due to __rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu() cutting short
the iteration over the hash table if it finds a matching peer with a
zero usage count, but I don't know for sure since it's only ever been
hit once that I know of.
Another possibility is that a bug in rxrpc_data_ready() that checked
the wrong byte in the header for the RXRPC_CLIENT_INITIATED flag
might've let through a packet that caused a spurious and invalid call
to be set up. That is addressed in another patch.
(3) Fix __rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu() to skip peer records that have a zero
usage count rather than stopping and returning not found, just in case
there's another peer record behind it in the bucket.
(4) Don't search the peer records in rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call(), but
rather either use the peer cached in (2) or, if one wasn't found,
preemptively install a new one.
Fixes: 8496af50eb38 ("rxrpc: Use RCU to access a peer's service connection tree")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc/conn_object.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/rxrpc/conn_object.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c index 390ba50cfab4..b4438f98dc5c 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c @@ -69,10 +69,14 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_alloc_connection(gfp_t gfp) * If successful, a pointer to the connection is returned, but no ref is taken. * NULL is returned if there is no match. * + * When searching for a service call, if we find a peer but no connection, we + * return that through *_peer in case we need to create a new service call. + * * The caller must be holding the RCU read lock. */ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_connection_rcu(struct rxrpc_local *local, - struct sk_buff *skb) + struct sk_buff *skb, + struct rxrpc_peer **_peer) { struct rxrpc_connection *conn; struct rxrpc_conn_proto k; @@ -104,6 +108,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_connection_rcu(struct rxrpc_local *local, peer = rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu(local, &srx); if (!peer) goto not_found; + *_peer = peer; conn = rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(peer, skb); if (!conn || atomic_read(&conn->usage) == 0) goto not_found; |