diff options
| author | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-02-24 15:01:43 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2020-02-24 16:20:09 -0800 |
| commit | 3d9f773cf2876c01a505b9fe27270901d464e90a (patch) | |
| tree | d5ed0350db81b38cf8c0234d7c066f65595addff /net/core/skmsg.c | |
| parent | 37e1d9202225635772b32e340294208367279c2b (diff) | |
| download | linux-3d9f773cf2876c01a505b9fe27270901d464e90a.tar.bz2 | |
bpf: Use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() at simple call sites.
All of these cases are strictly of the form:
preempt_disable();
BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
preempt_enable();
Replace this with bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN()
with:
migrate_disable();
BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
migrate_enable();
On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT
enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as
there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a
preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same
CPU.
Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation.
The seccomp loop does not need protection over the loop. It only needs
protection per BPF filter program
[ tglx: Converted to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() ]
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200224145643.691493094@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/skmsg.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/core/skmsg.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c index eeb28cb85664..c479372f2cd2 100644 --- a/net/core/skmsg.c +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c @@ -628,7 +628,6 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, struct bpf_prog *prog; int ret; - preempt_disable(); rcu_read_lock(); prog = READ_ONCE(psock->progs.msg_parser); if (unlikely(!prog)) { @@ -638,7 +637,7 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, sk_msg_compute_data_pointers(msg); msg->sk = sk; - ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, msg); + ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, msg); ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, msg->sk_redir); psock->apply_bytes = msg->apply_bytes; if (ret == __SK_REDIRECT) { @@ -653,7 +652,6 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, } out: rcu_read_unlock(); - preempt_enable(); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_psock_msg_verdict); @@ -665,9 +663,7 @@ static int sk_psock_bpf_run(struct sk_psock *psock, struct bpf_prog *prog, skb->sk = psock->sk; bpf_compute_data_end_sk_skb(skb); - preempt_disable(); - ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb); - preempt_enable(); + ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb); /* strparser clones the skb before handing it to a upper layer, * meaning skb_orphan has been called. We NULL sk on the way out * to ensure we don't trigger a BUG_ON() in skb/sk operations |