diff options
author | Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> | 2021-03-25 13:58:48 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> | 2021-03-29 09:51:20 +0200 |
commit | 9e9714742fb70467464359693a73b911a630226f (patch) | |
tree | 01fb923d7e2428470d8abf9a1e4e6b1ff47f9f86 /net/can/bcm.c | |
parent | 1b479fb801602b22512f53c19b1f93a4fc5d5d9d (diff) | |
download | linux-9e9714742fb70467464359693a73b911a630226f.tar.bz2 |
can: bcm/raw: fix msg_namelen values depending on CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE
Since commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939
members") the sockaddr_can has been extended in size and a new
CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro has been introduced to calculate the protocol
specific needed size.
The ABI for the msg_name and msg_namelen has not been adapted to the
new CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro for the other CAN protocols which leads to
a problem when an existing binary reads the (increased) struct
sockaddr_can in msg_name.
Fixes: f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939 members")
Reported-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Tested-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/1135648123.112255.1616613706554.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at/T/#t
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325125850.1620-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/can/bcm.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/can/bcm.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index 0e5c37be4a2b..909b9e684e04 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>"); MODULE_ALIAS("can-proto-2"); +#define BCM_MIN_NAMELEN CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE(struct sockaddr_can, can_ifindex) + /* * easy access to the first 64 bit of can(fd)_frame payload. cp->data is * 64 bit aligned so the offset has to be multiples of 8 which is ensured @@ -1292,7 +1294,7 @@ static int bcm_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) /* no bound device as default => check msg_name */ DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_can *, addr, msg->msg_name); - if (msg->msg_namelen < CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE(*addr, can_ifindex)) + if (msg->msg_namelen < BCM_MIN_NAMELEN) return -EINVAL; if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN) @@ -1534,7 +1536,7 @@ static int bcm_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len, struct net *net = sock_net(sk); int ret = 0; - if (len < CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE(*addr, can_ifindex)) + if (len < BCM_MIN_NAMELEN) return -EINVAL; lock_sock(sk); @@ -1616,8 +1618,8 @@ static int bcm_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb); if (msg->msg_name) { - __sockaddr_check_size(sizeof(struct sockaddr_can)); - msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_can); + __sockaddr_check_size(BCM_MIN_NAMELEN); + msg->msg_namelen = BCM_MIN_NAMELEN; memcpy(msg->msg_name, skb->cb, msg->msg_namelen); } |