summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>2021-06-30 18:54:12 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-07-01 11:06:03 -0700
commitcd62734ca60dbb2ab5bb19c8d837dd9990955310 (patch)
tree395ad43b1e316da7658d2b0ee074174735a79716 /mm
parent4dd845b5a3e57ad07f26ef808707b064696fe34b (diff)
downloadlinux-cd62734ca60dbb2ab5bb19c8d837dd9990955310.tar.bz2
mm/rmap: split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
The behaviour of try_to_unmap_one() is difficult to follow because it performs different operations based on a fairly large set of flags used in different combinations. TTU_MUNLOCK is one such flag. However it is exclusively used by try_to_munlock() which specifies no other flags. Therefore rather than overload try_to_unmap_one() with unrelated behaviour split this out into it's own function and remove the flag. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210616105937.23201-4-apopple@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/mlock.c12
-rw-r--r--mm/rmap.c66
2 files changed, 55 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index df590fda5688..4ab757ab6fe8 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
/*
* Finish munlock after successful page isolation
*
- * Page must be locked. This is a wrapper for try_to_munlock()
+ * Page must be locked. This is a wrapper for page_mlock()
* and putback_lru_page() with munlock accounting.
*/
static void __munlock_isolated_page(struct page *page)
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void __munlock_isolated_page(struct page *page)
* and we don't need to check all the other vmas.
*/
if (page_mapcount(page) > 1)
- try_to_munlock(page);
+ page_mlock(page);
/* Did try_to_unlock() succeed or punt? */
if (!PageMlocked(page))
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void __munlock_isolation_failed(struct page *page)
* munlock()ed or munmap()ed, we want to check whether other vmas hold the
* page locked so that we can leave it on the unevictable lru list and not
* bother vmscan with it. However, to walk the page's rmap list in
- * try_to_munlock() we must isolate the page from the LRU. If some other
+ * page_mlock() we must isolate the page from the LRU. If some other
* task has removed the page from the LRU, we won't be able to do that.
* So we clear the PageMlocked as we might not get another chance. If we
* can't isolate the page, we leave it for putback_lru_page() and vmscan
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ unsigned int munlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
{
int nr_pages;
- /* For try_to_munlock() and to serialize with page migration */
+ /* For page_mlock() and to serialize with page migration */
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail(page), page);
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int __mlock_posix_error_return(long retval)
*
* The fast path is available only for evictable pages with single mapping.
* Then we can bypass the per-cpu pvec and get better performance.
- * when mapcount > 1 we need try_to_munlock() which can fail.
+ * when mapcount > 1 we need page_mlock() which can fail.
* when !page_evictable(), we need the full redo logic of putback_lru_page to
* avoid leaving evictable page in unevictable list.
*
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static unsigned long __munlock_pagevec_fill(struct pagevec *pvec,
*
* We don't save and restore VM_LOCKED here because pages are
* still on lru. In unmap path, pages might be scanned by reclaim
- * and re-mlocked by try_to_{munlock|unmap} before we unmap and
+ * and re-mlocked by page_mlock/try_to_unmap before we unmap and
* free them. This will result in freeing mlocked pages.
*/
void munlock_vma_pages_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index b9986c8db524..73c0ff1c73ab 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1411,10 +1411,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
- /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */
- if ((flags & TTU_MUNLOCK) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
- return true;
-
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && (flags & TTU_MIGRATION) &&
is_zone_device_page(page) && !is_device_private_page(page))
return true;
@@ -1476,8 +1472,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
break;
}
- if (flags & TTU_MUNLOCK)
- continue;
}
/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
@@ -1790,20 +1784,58 @@ void try_to_unmap(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
rmap_walk(page, &rwc);
}
+/*
+ * Walks the vma's mapping a page and mlocks the page if any locked vma's are
+ * found. Once one is found the page is locked and the scan can be terminated.
+ */
+static bool page_mlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, void *unused)
+{
+ struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
+ .page = page,
+ .vma = vma,
+ .address = address,
+ };
+
+ /* An un-locked vma doesn't have any pages to lock, continue the scan */
+ if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
+ return true;
+
+ while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
+ /*
+ * Need to recheck under the ptl to serialise with
+ * __munlock_pagevec_fill() after VM_LOCKED is cleared in
+ * munlock_vma_pages_range().
+ */
+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
+ /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */
+ if (!PageTransCompound(page))
+ mlock_vma_page(page);
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * no need to continue scanning other vma's if the page has
+ * been locked.
+ */
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/**
- * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
- * @page: the page to be munlocked
+ * page_mlock - try to mlock a page
+ * @page: the page to be mlocked
*
- * Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page
- * to make sure nobody else has this page mlocked. The page will be
- * returned with PG_mlocked cleared if no other vmas have it mlocked.
+ * Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page and mlocks
+ * the page if any are found. The page will be returned with PG_mlocked cleared
+ * if it is not mapped by any locked vmas.
*/
-
-void try_to_munlock(struct page *page)
+void page_mlock(struct page *page)
{
struct rmap_walk_control rwc = {
- .rmap_one = try_to_unmap_one,
- .arg = (void *)TTU_MUNLOCK,
+ .rmap_one = page_mlock_one,
.done = page_not_mapped,
.anon_lock = page_lock_anon_vma_read,
@@ -1855,7 +1887,7 @@ static struct anon_vma *rmap_walk_anon_lock(struct page *page,
* Find all the mappings of a page using the mapping pointer and the vma chains
* contained in the anon_vma struct it points to.
*
- * When called from try_to_munlock(), the mmap_lock of the mm containing the vma
+ * When called from page_mlock(), the mmap_lock of the mm containing the vma
* where the page was found will be held for write. So, we won't recheck
* vm_flags for that VMA. That should be OK, because that vma shouldn't be
* LOCKED.
@@ -1908,7 +1940,7 @@ static void rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
* Find all the mappings of a page using the mapping pointer and the vma chains
* contained in the address_space struct it points to.
*
- * When called from try_to_munlock(), the mmap_lock of the mm containing the vma
+ * When called from page_mlock(), the mmap_lock of the mm containing the vma
* where the page was found will be held for write. So, we won't recheck
* vm_flags for that VMA. That should be OK, because that vma shouldn't be
* LOCKED.