diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2018-08-22 17:30:15 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-08-23 11:55:58 -0700 |
commit | d86564a2f085b79ec046a5cba90188e612352806 (patch) | |
tree | 18172b419a9ec64fe7e2e569726a1e8db498a67c /mm | |
parent | a6f572084fbee8b30f91465f4a085d7a90901c57 (diff) | |
download | linux-d86564a2f085b79ec046a5cba90188e612352806.tar.bz2 |
mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE
Jann reported that x86 was missing required TLB invalidates when he
hit the !*batch slow path in tlb_remove_table().
This is indeed the case; RCU_TABLE_FREE does not provide TLB (cache)
invalidates, the PowerPC-hash where this code originated and the
Sparc-hash where this was subsequently used did not need that. ARM
which later used this put an explicit TLB invalidate in their
__p*_free_tlb() functions, and PowerPC-radix followed that example.
But when we hooked up x86 we failed to consider this. Fix this by
(optionally) hooking tlb_remove_table() into the TLB invalidate code.
NOTE: s390 was also needing something like this and might now
be able to use the generic code again.
[ Modified to be on top of Nick's cleanups, which simplified this patch
now that tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() really only flushes the TLB - Linus ]
Fixes: 9e52fc2b50de ("x86/mm: Enable RCU based page table freeing (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y)")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memory.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 1893751cf6c0..8b3442979855 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -330,6 +330,21 @@ bool __tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page, int page_ * See the comment near struct mmu_table_batch. */ +/* + * If we want tlb_remove_table() to imply TLB invalidates. + */ +static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE + /* + * Invalidate page-table caches used by hardware walkers. Then we still + * need to RCU-sched wait while freeing the pages because software + * walkers can still be in-flight. + */ + tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); +#endif +} + static void tlb_remove_table_smp_sync(void *arg) { /* Simply deliver the interrupt */ @@ -366,6 +381,7 @@ void tlb_table_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch; if (*batch) { + tlb_table_invalidate(tlb); call_rcu_sched(&(*batch)->rcu, tlb_remove_table_rcu); *batch = NULL; } @@ -378,11 +394,13 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table) if (*batch == NULL) { *batch = (struct mmu_table_batch *)__get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); if (*batch == NULL) { + tlb_table_invalidate(tlb); tlb_remove_table_one(table); return; } (*batch)->nr = 0; } + (*batch)->tables[(*batch)->nr++] = table; if ((*batch)->nr == MAX_TABLE_BATCH) tlb_table_flush(tlb); |