diff options
author | Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> | 2018-02-02 15:26:57 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-02-02 19:49:31 -0500 |
commit | edbe69ef2c90fc86998a74b08319a01c508bd497 (patch) | |
tree | ae886133adf7f3518a47f81db0644fe74732b80b /mm | |
parent | 4db428a7c9ab07e08783e0fcdc4ca0f555da0567 (diff) | |
download | linux-edbe69ef2c90fc86998a74b08319a01c508bd497.tar.bz2 |
Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"
This patch effectively reverts commit 9f1c2674b328 ("net: memcontrol:
defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()").
Moving mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() to the inet_csk_accept() completely breaks
memcg socket memory accounting, as packets received before memcg
pointer initialization are not accounted and are causing refcounting
underflow on socket release.
Actually the free-after-use problem was fixed by
commit c0576e397508 ("net: call cgroup_sk_alloc() earlier in
sk_clone_lock()") for the cgroup pointer.
So, let's revert it and call mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() just before
cgroup_sk_alloc(). This is safe, as we hold a reference to the socket
we're cloning, and it holds a reference to the memcg.
Also, let's drop BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root()) check from
mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(). I see no reasons why bumping the root
memcg counter is a good reason to panic, and there are no realistic
ways to hit it.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 0ae2dc3a1748..0937f2c52c7d 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -5747,6 +5747,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk) if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled) return; + /* + * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already + * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from + * process context. So the test for root memcg given + * the current task's memcg won't help us in this case. + * + * Respecting the original socket's memcg is a better + * decision in this case. + */ + if (sk->sk_memcg) { + css_get(&sk->sk_memcg->css); + return; + } + rcu_read_lock(); memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current); if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup) |