diff options
author | Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> | 2018-01-31 16:19:52 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-01-31 17:18:39 -0800 |
commit | 69d763fc6d3aee787a3e8c8c35092b4f4960fa5d (patch) | |
tree | d4ef12c68e16fb5ef0febc788d50b6c0e51a2bb6 /mm | |
parent | 284cd241a18ee6d999296f8ff3104eb6d2fc898f (diff) | |
download | linux-69d763fc6d3aee787a3e8c8c35092b4f4960fa5d.tar.bz2 |
mm: pin address_space before dereferencing it while isolating an LRU page
Minchan Kim asked the following question -- what locks protects
address_space destroying when race happens between inode trauncation and
__isolate_lru_page? Jan Kara clarified by describing the race as follows
CPU1 CPU2
truncate(inode) __isolate_lru_page()
...
truncate_inode_page(mapping, page);
delete_from_page_cache(page)
spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
__delete_from_page_cache(page, NULL)
page_cache_tree_delete(..)
... mapping = page_mapping(page);
page->mapping = NULL;
...
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
page_cache_free_page(mapping, page)
put_page(page)
if (put_page_testzero(page)) -> false
- inode now has no pages and can be freed including embedded address_space
if (mapping && !mapping->a_ops->migratepage)
- we've dereferenced mapping which is potentially already free.
The race is theoretically possible but unlikely. Before the
delete_from_page_cache, truncate_cleanup_page is called so the page is
likely to be !PageDirty or PageWriteback which gets skipped by the only
caller that checks the mappping in __isolate_lru_page. Even if the race
occurs, a substantial amount of work has to happen during a tiny window
with no preemption but it could potentially be done using a virtual
machine to artifically slow one CPU or halt it during the critical
window.
This patch should eliminate the race with truncation by try-locking the
page before derefencing mapping and aborting if the lock was not
acquired. There was a suggestion from Huang Ying to use RCU as a
side-effect to prevent mapping being freed. However, I do not like the
solution as it's an unconventional means of preserving a mapping and
it's not a context where rcu_read_lock is obviously protecting rcu data.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180104102512.2qos3h5vqzeisrek@techsingularity.net
Fixes: c82449352854 ("mm: compaction: make isolate_lru_page() filter-aware again")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 1a33c8e1e758..fdd3fc6be862 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1415,14 +1415,24 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) if (PageDirty(page)) { struct address_space *mapping; + bool migrate_dirty; /* * Only pages without mappings or that have a * ->migratepage callback are possible to migrate - * without blocking + * without blocking. However, we can be racing with + * truncation so it's necessary to lock the page + * to stabilise the mapping as truncation holds + * the page lock until after the page is removed + * from the page cache. */ + if (!trylock_page(page)) + return ret; + mapping = page_mapping(page); - if (mapping && !mapping->a_ops->migratepage) + migrate_dirty = mapping && mapping->a_ops->migratepage; + unlock_page(page); + if (!migrate_dirty) return ret; } } |