diff options
| author | Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com> | 2017-07-06 15:36:50 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-07-06 16:24:31 -0700 |
| commit | f2f43e566a02a3bdde0a65e6a2e88d707c212a29 (patch) | |
| tree | 7607b53a29c2cfaf45860ac033cb96903ea93c9a /mm/vmscan.c | |
| parent | ac34ceaf1cdb34e8c34c0873ee562e9df6087cbc (diff) | |
| download | linux-f2f43e566a02a3bdde0a65e6a2e88d707c212a29.tar.bz2 | |
mm/vmscan.c: fix unsequenced modification and access warning
Clang and its -Wunsequenced emits a warning
mm/vmscan.c:2961:25: error: unsequenced modification and access to 'gfp_mask' [-Wunsequenced]
.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)),
^
While it is not clear to me whether the initialization code violates the
specification (6.7.8 par 19 (ISO/IEC 9899) looks like it disagrees) the
code is quite confusing and worth cleaning up anyway. Fix this by
reusing sc.gfp_mask rather than the updated input gfp_mask parameter.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170510154030.10720-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index c3c1c6ac62da..a10e05870835 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2967,7 +2967,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order, unsigned long nr_reclaimed; struct scan_control sc = { .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, - .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)), + .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask), .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask), .order = order, .nodemask = nodemask, @@ -2982,12 +2982,12 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order, * 1 is returned so that the page allocator does not OOM kill at this * point. */ - if (throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask)) + if (throttle_direct_reclaim(sc.gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask)) return 1; trace_mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin(order, sc.may_writepage, - gfp_mask, + sc.gfp_mask, sc.reclaim_idx); nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc); @@ -3774,17 +3774,16 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order; struct task_struct *p = current; struct reclaim_state reclaim_state; - int classzone_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask); unsigned int noreclaim_flag; struct scan_control sc = { .nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX), - .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)), + .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask), .order = order, .priority = NODE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY, .may_writepage = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE), .may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP), .may_swap = 1, - .reclaim_idx = classzone_idx, + .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask), }; cond_resched(); @@ -3795,7 +3794,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in */ noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save(); p->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE; - lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask); + lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask); reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0; p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state; |