summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/vmscan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>2010-03-05 13:41:55 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2010-03-06 11:26:25 -0800
commit93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7 (patch)
treedeb08017c0e4874539549d3ea9bf2d7b447a43be /mm/vmscan.c
parentfc91668eaf9e7ba61e867fc2218b7e9fb67faa4f (diff)
downloadlinux-93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7.tar.bz2
mm: restore zone->all_unreclaimable to independence word
commit e815af95 ("change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags") changed all_unreclaimable member to bit flag. But it had an undesireble side effect. free_one_page() is one of most hot path in linux kernel and increasing atomic ops in it can reduce kernel performance a bit. Thus, this patch revert such commit partially. at least all_unreclaimable shouldn't share memory word with other zone flags. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix patch interaction] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c22
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bc0f8db8340f..5cbf64dd79c1 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1699,8 +1699,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
continue;
note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) &&
- priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
continue; /* Let kswapd poll it */
sc->all_unreclaimable = 0;
} else {
@@ -1927,7 +1926,7 @@ static int sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining)
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
continue;
if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, high_wmark_pages(zone),
@@ -2017,8 +2016,7 @@ loop_again:
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) &&
- priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
continue;
/*
@@ -2061,8 +2059,7 @@ loop_again:
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) &&
- priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
continue;
temp_priority[i] = priority;
@@ -2089,12 +2086,11 @@ loop_again:
lru_pages);
sc.nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
continue;
- if (nr_slab == 0 && zone->pages_scanned >=
- (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6))
- zone_set_flag(zone,
- ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE);
+ if (nr_slab == 0 &&
+ zone->pages_scanned >= (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6))
+ zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
/*
* If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
* the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
@@ -2624,7 +2620,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) <= zone->min_slab_pages)
return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
- if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
+ if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
/*